Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[justawatt]

one more successful kapanadze replication



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YIYRCS3h9Q

[Belfior]

I have had the same  conversation  with one of my professors very long time ago, and he could not find it  as well.
So it was  turned to  2 weeks of  heavy digging .
We come to conclusion  mutually  that it was Priestley response not
Volta's response based on material  on hand.
We contacted Rosemary Lloyd PhD, University of Cambridge, UK, 1979  he was in  literature and the fine arts. 
He  was actually  just fresh,  young  and willing to help.
And he  was skilled in digging  in  that material .
Unfortunately
Even Wikipedia is not free of errors.
I do thank you for your help.

Wesley

Ok did not find the original letter, but it was an open letter from Volta to Priestley, so it was published in journals like Amoretti's journal, Rozier's journal and in "Scelta di opuscoli interessanti" in 1776

so TADAA! There is the link to the publication and on page 127 is Volta's letter to Priestley. Volta was asking Priestley if this invention is new. Later Priestley replied, that it was invented by a Swedish guy Wilcke.

https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=nyp.33433075841308;view=1up;seq=501

"Mi truovo in grado di chiamare que-
fta fpecie d'elettricità Vindice indeficiente
e il mio apparecchio Elettroforo perpetuo.
"
Good book where all communication between Volta and Priestley is explained is "Electricity in the 17th and 18th Centuries: A Study of Early Modern Physics" where the attached image is from.

But really all this proves is that the letter exists.

[stivep]

In did there is indication of such.
The letter from the link  attached also does not provide  the answer as well.
The  form of the language  uses  quite old structure  so to speak  but I managed it .
I do appreciate your time spend.


Today I have had a chance to speak to  my friend Dr Roy about porous dielectric  used by Volta.
We have been together for quite few hours traveling to Long Island in my car.
Good thing is that I got him interested, although   we both reject capacitor that will "never discharge" to "the end"   in  the series of discharges  described by Volta
So  I need  to look again into porous dielectric used by Volta.
From few other things we touched basics of  magnetism in atomic structure  questioning  atom  orbital motion  and mess  done by
Niels Bohr and Ernest Rutherford in 1913, who  depicts the atom as a small, positively charged nucleus surrounded by electrons that travel in circular orbits around the nucleus—similar to structure of the Solar System,
Nothing more wrong than that.
As far as electron  - it certainly has a mass  and we know it because it interacts with the Higghs field 
But electron should be seen  rather  as movement of charge in cloud.
Electron can  have speed  always lower than speed of light but it can be pretty slow.
the only time it'll stop is at 0Kelvin.
In my lab I can go  as low as 4K Kelvin
But this  is already much, much  lower, than  77K the temperature of Liquid Nitrogen LN2   
However I found it fascinating at first so  I got complete  line of production of LN2
Many of problems  comes from the simple semantics while humans educated in  early 20 century  tend to  cite  Bohr .
He was not wrong, he was just early, and only  long after him he was proven inaccurate.

Wesley

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_field
The Higgs field is a field of energy that is thought to exist in every region of the universe.
The field is accompanied by a fundamental particle known as the Higgs boson,
which is used by the field to continuously interact with other particles, such as the electron.

[apecore]

Hello everyone!

May I sugest something if you keen to get hands dirty on this?

Back on the day when Ruslan was having fun with Tesla coil and grenade without inductor https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPkHNq6Wji0 there was some interesting similarity - https://i.imgur.com/8p1yvH3.jpg . But the bifilar coils (you can ignore grenade winding way, it is used as 2 counter bifilar coils) was shorted on the one end then had diode bridge and then was charging 1uF capacitor bank up to 1kV from the plain Tesla output.
Mind someone could put grenade coil away temporary? Then make bifilar coil with lets say, 40 meters of wire with total inductance nearing to 0uH? Then assemble that instead of grenade and connect begining of windings to the ground. And have diode bridge with 1 uF cap bank attached some spark gap as dummy discharge from 1kV.
And try to tune Tesla coil to the point of reaching quick charging of output caps to high voltage over very short period of time. And see if you would be able to achieve that...?

Cheers!

Hi everybody...  Hi T1000,

I did some test with a kacher and a grenade after i looked at your posted vids from Ruslan and Alexey..

In my attached vid you can see i am driving a simple kacher circuit with my varable power supply which is supplied by 12V from a car batterie.
I do not interupt the kacher,..  its continously running
The bulb is a 20W (or maybe a 40W // 240V type), connected to 18uF caps and a full bridge rectifier.

In normal setup.. only with antenna connected to the kacher secundairy there is almost no power generated,... (also not frequenty depended)
In my case i put a aluminium foil inside the grenade tube and connected to the antenna (with series cap 1nf)...  the series cap does not make a lot difference)
As you can see i get the highest output at the bulb when poth legs of the grenade are connected toone side of the bridge rectifier.... the other leg is connected to the kacher transistors emittor.
It also does not matter when only one leg of the grenade is connected to the bridge....
Groundline connection is also not a mayor player in the game either..

Maybe some suggestions what the reason is why yhis extra inside aluminium foil is giving this more output gain?  btw,..  suing a coil inside gives the same result...  the foil has the highest increase due it probally has the highest square cm?


https://youtu.be/7fUZhLX8tu0

Please give me your comments

Greetings

[Belfior]

I do appreciate your time spend.

No problem. It was something I had to find. I have seen references to this letter many times, so I had to prove there was one.

Today I have had a chance to speak to  my friend Dr Roy about porous dielectric  used by Volta.
We have been together for quite few hours traveling to Long Island in my car.
Good thing is that I got him interested, although   we both reject capacitor that will "never discharge" to "the end"   in  the series of discharges  described by Volta
So  I need  to look again into porous dielectric used by Volta.

I have read that rubber can be used, but wikipedia says it was originally wax or pitch.

"The electrophorus consists of a dielectric plate (originally a 'cake' of resinous material such as pitch or wax, but in modern versions plastic is used) and a metal plate with an insulating handle"

So you first charge the dielectric by rubbing it with fur or cloth (wool?). Then you place the metal plate over it. Electrostatic field charges the bottom of the metal plate positive and top part negative. Then you lift the plate and "ground" the top part by touching it with your finger. Now you got positive charge on the plate and you can zap things with it.

I want to try this with capacitors. Create a static field and place a cap in it. Lift the cap up from one leg with fingers. Then measure voltage in it