Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[AlienGrey]

Some years back now Erick Dollard was experimenting with The Ed Gray tube
Most of it was done by Aaron Morakami over on the Energetic forum.

I suggest you look into that device.
But bear in mind all things can on this thread help in accelerating a phenomena when brought to gather.

Sil

[onepower]

NickZ

I mentioned basically the same thing as SL, but, that there is only a slight benefit in output, from just an additive wave, nor will it produce OU, nor self running. As that is what this is all about, not just running one wave onto another one, without much if any additional output. Or, what's the point? Accelerating electrons, at what cost? No cost?
   
However, an interuptive signal wave, will, that is the difference. It is NOT additive, but interuptive, instead.  The idea is to use that type of wave signal or action, instead. Which is what I have been trying to do. Same as was shown by Ruslan, Stalker, and Adrian, etc.

A progression of understanding and perspective must usually occur before we find any success in making real progress...

After the bulk terminology and equations of science, after the lump sums, after the wave/resonance theory, Katcher, electronics, grenade coils and Aether, vortex, do not kill the dipole of FE...we are still left wanting. We are left wanting because 99% of what we learned has little to do with what were actually looking for.

As SL implied, if we start breaking down any circuit we are left with the unavoidable truth that the conduction electrons are the "charge" carriers. So in order for any circuit to gain extra energy an extra force must be applied to the electrons in the circuit. It's basically that simple and we can add all the complexity and scientific lingo we want however it's not going to change these facts.

We could break it down into a line of reasoning...
-What do we want?, we want to do extra work in a circuit.
-What is work?, Work is a Force acting on something over a Distance causing it to move.
-What are we trying to move?, some conduction electrons in a circuit.
-How can we make the electrons move in a circuit?, here we have few options 1)an electric field and 2)a magnetic field.

Which begs the only relevant question, what is it were actually looking for?. Were looking for an extra force caused by an electric and/or magnetic field which caused the electrons to move more which enabled them to do more work.

It's not that difficult and I used a process I call "follow the electrons" or reverse engineering. So we look at the load and start following the electrons backwards through the circuit towards the source. If there is in fact extra work being done on the electrons then somewhere between the load and source an extra force must have been applied to them. When we determine where the extra current/voltage first appeared then we have a pretty good indication of where the extra force appeared. This should be our only area of interest and the rest of the circuit is generally much ado about nothing.

In this respect what we think is of little consequence with respect to how we think and how our thinking relates to our ability to solve problems. If how we think makes solving any problem easier then were looking pretty good but if not then there's probably room for improvement.

Regards
AC






   

[NickZ]

    AC:    Yes, so simple you'll laugh. 
    Well now that you've figured this all out, it should be so easy and simple to make a self runner, that it shouldn't take you or SL more than 10 years or so, to KNOW how to do it, before you actually do it. So simple... I hear you talking...  But, never seen you build anything that self runs. Are you now waiting to know how, first. Maybe you'll find the answer in your science books?
OR just simply "follow the electrons" back to the grid source. But, you'll never figure this out by guessing, or thinking that you know.

     Regards,
                 NickZ
   4th state of Matter?  Video: https://youtu.be/AVEGJZxglIg
    I don't agree with some of the ideas about "plasma being Matter".
    Is lightning, matter?  Is emply space made of 4th state of matter? Is electricity made of this "matter"?

[stivep]

AC:    Yes, so simple you'll laugh. 
// to make a self runner, that it shouldn't take you or SL more than 10 years
   
   4th state of Matter?  Video: https://youtu.be/AVEGJZxglIg
    I don't agree about "plasma being Matter".
    Is lightning, matter?  Is emply space made of 4th state of matter? Is electricity made of this "matter"?

https://youtu.be/wOV8kliF4eo?t=243

No matter what - ideas do you have:
-plasma is a matter as it is made out of matter:
occupies space and possesses rest mass, especially as distinct from energy.
-lightning is a matter. _{a highly electrically conductive plasma channel is created within
  the air, and when current flows within this channel, it rapidly heats the air up to about 25,000°C.}
 
- empty space is made of: https://www.quora.com/What-is-empty-space-made-of
- Is electricity made up of matter?  the answer is here:
  https://www.quora.com/Is-electricity-made-up-of-matter

Wesley

[stivep]

// success in making real progress...//
//in order for any circuit to gain extra energy an extra force must be applied .//

// reasoning...
-What do we want?, we want to do extra work in a circuit.
-What is work?, Work is a Force acting on something over a Distance causing it to move.
-What are we trying to move?, some conduction electrons in a circuit.
-How can we make the electrons move in a circuit?, here we have few options 1)an electric field and 2)a magnetic field.
what is it were actually looking for?.
If there is in fact extra work being done //  between the load and source an extra force must have been applied 
the extra current/voltage //is the //indication of the extra force appeared.
AC

Thank you very much for excellent comment.
so simple, so logical, and so beautiful in its form  analysis and conclusion.
However not complete. - as your answer would take much more space here.

_______________________________________________________________


reasoning:
In the past 12 years of my activity in FE I've seen :

Group #1
-individuals with visually significant effect all the work that concentrated attention of researchers,
scientists, opportunists, weirdos, homemade experimenters,
-people with money but no or little knowledge, 
-people with money no knowledge, ready to pay for sources of knowledge, and results benefiting them.
-people with money whose nonprofit activity makes them socially and politically strong, allowing
to avoid more taxes and often attention of fiscal systems e.g - creator of Microsoft.
-------------------------------------------------
Group #2
-people with money  who despite their knowledge are ready to spend money :
because of their ego, self-esteem, faith, orientation, emotion, willingness to be written into history,
- people with money  who despite their knowledge are ready to spend money because of guilt,
  e.g: those who did wrong, and now voluntarily want to do that what is good to pay for it.
  e.g: those who got out of trouble, loss of life or health, and again second chance in life and wealth.
-------------------------------------------------
Group #3
-Intelligent, educated, not wealthy but not in poverty individuals  steady and likely not shaky in their day to day life .
- people so independent from social, business, etc. who gained that special part of freedom of talking, acting, interacting,
  traveling, investing much enough but not too much in a hobby (their comfort of life allows them for.)
  that could be:
    e.g:retied employees
    e.g:white collar workers ( suit-and-tie workers who work at a desk and, stereotypically, eschew physical labor. )
    e.g:good standing financially students
  -business owners having hobbies and needs,  often other then their business activity.


Personally I think I belong to a group Group #3
_______________________________________________________________

activity:
-despite of their motivation, most of them were looking for checked working replicable concept or ready to buy device.-the more advanced, were looking for the concept,
-the most advanced usually gave up, monitoring any news in this field.

most of them didn't care much:
what energy is coming from!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and it was their biggest mistake.

I gave all of you as much as I was allowed to:
-working concept
-working system
-explained source of energy
-explained mechanism of work
-explained application

I didn't give all of you :
visual representation of working system.

Because even if I think that I belong to a Group # 3
I have that unique additional part of freedom:  explained in green color in my comment.






Wesley