Seven times more energy output than input: Power Multiplier Device

[Russell Lee]

There are two kinds of people in the world, those that contribute, and those that comment on the contributions of others. I have been blessed to contribute two free energy generator designs (Pinwheel Generator, Power Multiplier Device), and the Grow-Live Tower that is a greenhousing structure that houses and feeds it's inhabitants.  Together they both would end world hunger, provide free energy to the world, end famine, reduce global disease by 85% due to improved living conditions, etc.. I don't really listen to professional comment people. They say a lot but actually contribute little.  This design of the PMD is too simple not to understand.  Too obvious in it's excess energy production to need extra measures.  Most have no problem with this, few do.  Comment people will always have problems with the designs of others, that is why they comment so much, it is their existence. Russ

Take TK's advice, it is very liberating. I remember I had this buoyancy puzzle that had me stumped for months. It also had some respected scientists puzzled. It was not until Zero did a test, and a few weeks latter I built a proof of concept that we realized why I was such a dumb ass.
Something basic and simple principles had escaped us all. Although sad it was over , the mystery was solved and I learned a lot along the way.
That is why i has so much respect for TK, Zero and many others who build and test. Experience is invaluable.
Kind Regards

[zoelra]

@Russell Lee

I would like to read more about your idea.  Can you provide a link to the specific forum topic or give me the name.  I looked around but didn't really see anything that fit what you and webby1 were saying.

Thanks

[LibreEnergia]

Interesting comment. Having another matter consuming all of my current resources and time at present I have none for this future project.  I will attempt another explanation of this mechanism. One PMD generator unit consists of the PMD, the chain and main sprockets, the transmission, and the generator.  This all generates energy into the battery. The example I gave was with 7 PMD units. If the descend time for the PMD is 3 minutes, and the ascend time is 30 seconds, there are six 30 second periods in the 3 minute descend time. One PMD unit at each 30 second position, and one at the bottom (to begin it's ascending) equals 7 PMD units. When the bottom one reaches the top in 30 seconds, the next PMD unit has reached the bottom to begin ascending.  In this scenario there will always be 6 PMD units on the decending/generating side of their individual cycles, and one on it's ascending side of it's cycle.  Fairly simple to understand.  If there is continually a situation where 6 full charges are entering the battery, and only one full charge being drawn out of the battery, 6-1= 5 full charges of energy being stored in the battery in excess of the needs for the functioning of the whole sytem. Cardboard or not.? Visualize seven PMD units in a row having each of their cables running to the same common battery. All of the individual PMDs charging into the same battery. I cannot explain the functioning of this mechanism more simply than this. Russell Lee

I find it astonishing that anyone could look at such a concept and come to the conclusion that it has any possibility of generating energy. It should be intuitively obvious that the cyclic movement of masses in a gravitational field results in zero net energy production.

To the specifics of this machine, while the 6 generators are descending they would certainly be able to convert enough gravitational potential energy to electrical energy to allow one generator to be lifted back to the starting position. If you stop the analysis there then you might be fooled into thinking it is feasible and that this process could be made to run continuously.

In fact,  if the energy losses in the generation and consumption of electrical energy were small it might be able to cycle for quite a while. Eventually,  it will stop once those losses equal the energy given to the device at the start, such as having a pre-charged battery or having all the generators at the top.

[markdansie]

Dear Russell
I am sad you believed you have contributed to two free energy machines. Your ambitions are noble but unfortunately there is not evidence to support your claim. i wish you all the best in your endevour.
Kind Regards

[Russell Lee]

 I have challenged anyone to, by using engineering principles, prove that either the Pinwheel Generator, or the Power Multiplier Device are not authentic free energy generators. Thus far there have only been egg throwers targeting me and not the designs. They cannot challenge the designs so they throw eggs at me.
  You cannot show me where the PMD design is flawed so you attack me. You cannot show me where the Pinwheel Generator design is flawed so you attack me. There are many that believe they qualify as design engineers simply because they have seen every Star Trek movie ever made-they don't.
  If you have sound reasoning for believing either design is flawed I would like to hear it, that is what this website is about-information exchange, but you don't.
  Both are authentic free (excess) energy generators, if they weren't there would have been a valid challenge agains't the Pinwheel Generator in the decade since it's release, or the PMD in the months it has been out. You cannot challenge these designs because they are valid. You can only throw eggs.
  This is the challenge to ALL-AGAIN-SHOW ME THE REASON WHY THESE DESIGNS ARE INVALID-OR GO BACK TO STAR TREK FANTASY LAND WHERE YOU BELONG.
"There is not evidence to support your claim", GREAT! Why not? What has not been thoroughly explained over and over? Where is the grey area? What is it about these simple designs that is too difficult to understand?  Enough eggs, explain your challange to these designs, as an engineer would, or be quiet.  Russell Lee
 
 

Dear Russell
I am sad you believed you have contributed to two free energy machines. Your ambitions are noble but unfortunately there is not evidence to support your claim. i wish you all the best in your endevour.
Kind Regards