Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[forest]

hanon

I see Buforn filled a lot of patents and had described a lot inside. Any chance to translate all those patents into English ? I'm especially interest if he directly or indirectly mentioned Lenz law and how he eliminated it in his setup. Is there any better automatic free online translator then "google translate" ?

[Cadman]

One must understand how a DC Dynamo works to produce current

That is the foundation to build upon. If you understand how a dynamo works and the principals behind it then you see plainly how this motionless generator works. There is a wealth of information available that teaches the fundamentals and the mathematical formulas used in dynamo design.

The Figuera / Buforn design is founded on a modified standard dynamo design. The concept drawings below show how I think this generator evolved in their minds between 1902 and 1914. You can see how the 1908 version is just a representation of one magnetic circuit path of a standard generator. In the 1914 representation you can see how the field coils make use of both their poles, which a standard dynamo and the 1908 configuration do not. The 1908 and later patent drawings do not show the magnetic circuit because it was well understood and the point of the patent was the variation of the fields.

Regards

[hanon]

The discussion about pole orientation comes from time ago. The problem is that Figuera in 1908 patent did not clearly stated the pole orientation (nor in the 1908 patent, neither Buforn did it in his latter 5 more patents !!!). I will copy literally what it is written in the 1908 patent (both in the text and in the claims) so that everyone may judge if this a properly way of defining the pole orientation or maybe it is just a patent notation "trick" using the letters "N" and "S"

IN THE DESCRIPTION: "Suppose that electromagnets are represented by rectangles N and S. Between their poles is located the induced circuit represented by the line "y" (small)"

IN THE CLAIMS: "The machine is essentially characterized by two series of electromagnets which form the inductor circuit, between whose poles the reels of the induced are properly placed."

What a way of defining the pole orientation if he is just calling them as "rectangles N and S". Note that Figuera left the claims open to any kind of orientation. Suspicious? ...

Buforn filed 5 more patents after Figuera's death in 1908. I have not translated them because they all are exact copies of the Figuera 1908 patent. More literature but the same device. You can see it by comparing Buforn's drawings with the drawing from Figuera in 1908.... almost photocopies.

[Cadman]

In dynamos and generators the induced coil itself determines the polarity of the field magnets. Picture a rectangular coil, one side of the coil must be induced by a positive field and the other side by a negative. If both sides are induced by the same polarity field coil the induced emf of each side will cancel the other and there will be no output. That is fact. Now whether or not each side of the induced coil may be induced by a double set of same polarity field coils is not mentioned and may well be worth investigating. However there is a point where the iron core or teeth of the induced can be over saturated and the induction currents produced in the induced fields can seriously counter the inducing field and lower the output.

[marathonman]

Thank you Hanon for clarifying that.
I agree also with the rectangles, they are never called North and south just n and s. this leaves it to open for interpretation  even after reading it many, many times.
Cadman i am planning to pursue the double pinch effect as nothing else has worked very good to date for me so off i go again.