Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[antijon]

Doug, great idea for the commutator. Now that I see what you mean, it looks very familiar to what i have been working on. But i still don't understand the arrangement with the output coil(s). Do you have multiple coils?

[hanon]

Could you make an sketch of that commutator design? I really appreaciate it

Is it a kind of central shaft with a brush rotating inside a barrel with all the contacts in the circunference. Have I understood it fine?

A simpler design of the commutator would make easier to replicate this machine

[Doug1]

Hannon
The output coil is singular one that I pulled from a transformer 126T able to hold up to an input of 20amps at 120 volts when used on a laminated core. I try to keep to one size former or bobbin so I can pull parts off old small welders which happen to fit the winding bobbin size for the large starter motors from diesel engine trucks with a little bit of persuasion. I can use one more description to clear your image of the commutator. Think of it looking like the stripes on a barber pole or a candy cane and all the conductors are made from thick wire and terminate on a ring at the ends of the pole. The spacing is wider and the pitch less then a barber pole but that is the best way i can describe it. If the dwell is too short with thick wire then I will have to come back over it with flat ribbon copper to widen the time the contacts touch the copper.
  I could try to slow down the motor but I don't want any extra parts involved that have to be maintained. I pulled all my contact brushes from the starter motors with the spring assemblies ,they are really big as brushes go and the handle 2.5 kw per set of 2.each motor has 4 brushes in it. They are not carbon, they some kind of composite brass or bronze chips compressed with a carbon powder. Im guessing the are expensive since they came out of Lees Navile starters. 

[DreamThinkBuild]

Hi Doug1,

Attached is a simplified interpretation of your design. Is this somewhat close? It would be much more compact but for clarity it is expanded. The wires could be weaved back and forth to create a sweeping motion across the coils.

[bajac]

I have to tell you guys, except from Figuera, I just cannot believe that such a basic concept relating the ironless coils and overunity has been overlooked by the greatest minds of the last 120 years.

I keep going back on reviewing the paper proposing the concept for overunity when using ironless coils and I have not been able to find a flaw in the theory. I also keep searching for any information related to the use of ironless armature coils. Most of the information related to these type of generators contain hints indicating that there is something especial with this technology. And, I have also found a small number of papers related to the wind generators with ironless coils, which have contradictory information. For instance, in one of the IEEE papers the efficiency was estimated to be smaller than 100%, however, the graphs plotted for the magnetic fields in the air gap (armature reaction) corresponding to the no-load and full-load conditions clearly indicates only minor differences between the two conditions. That is, the graphs show that the magnitudes of the torques at no-load and full-load are about the same. Then, how is it possible to have an efficiency smaller than 100%?

Am I missing something? I am still in a state of disbelief!