Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[AVENGERS]

hanon
I'll start with ( six@4k & 0ne@2k ) that should get me in the ballpark & get the pc board working. I used my best guess from page#194, 3-26 of pjk e book.
Thank You, AVENGERS

marathonman
I would be glad to use more volts and purchase the vitreous edge, I need a sketch to go by, could you provide one , please.
I would just wind up smoking more components.
Thank You, AVENGERS

[AVENGERS]

Doug1
Thank You for the compass direction. I have labeled the coils and the cores, when applying small volts to the PLUS and the poles do reverse when applying volts to the NEGATIVE of the coils.
I rewound the Y core with one wrap of #6 stranded (awg) 600 volt wire, just incase something large comes out.
AVENGERS

hanon
I have cut that small (secondary )wire that is attached to the transformer, thinking I can leave it and not bother removing it from the core, still makes a nice strong electromagnet. Separating the I from the mounting plate is tricky, I found the safe way to keep the individual plates from coming apart is to grind each weld down far enough, Tape the core together for insurance, and chisel the plate away from the I core a little at a time. The I core on the left in the pic, did come apart as I wasn't using tape yet. I taped it up and flattened it out the best I could and smoothed it out on an inverted belt sander.
The pc board will be easy to change values of components. no need to de-soldier.
Thank You all for your help

AVENGERS

[AVENGERS]

hanon
I think I have it now? 6 each 4ohm, 10watt resistors and 1 each 2ohm 10watt resistor.
Thank You, AVENGERS

[Doug1]

Hanon
  I finally looked over the bucking coil pdf.Glad it was the same info as the youtube automotron voice.Reading it works better for me any way. I dont agree with it entirely but I see it is the inverse method where the leverage is being used in the output coil and the input coil.
  I would think the figurea method having the ability to tune the two inducers with a balance input is a improvement since in the real world stuff happens. When the writer of the paper speaks of keeping the two primary fields separate is where I have a problem.If they are NN or ss they keep themselves separate. He also speaks of the fields growing and collapsing at the same time. I take that to mean he is placing them both in the power on position at the same time when he gets zero results. Im reasonably certain that was his mistake, I do not recall ever reading that both inducer coils were powered on equally in time. Just from the physical construction taken from the drawings it would be clearly offset N and S inducers being powered 180 degrees apart from each other.In themselves each inducer is a complete individual field. The induced coil or pick coil is stationary so the field is what has to move and since they are same poles facing each other the only way for the induced to see relative change in motion is for one of them to collapse enough for the other to expand over the induced coil and then for it to switch back and forth. That way the induced coil sees a relative change in the direction of movement even though the pole faces are the of the same sign. Another advantage in the pole orientation is that as one is falling off the force against it from the opposing magnet will add to the force of the other in its collapse by a small amount. Going back the paper and ref the floyd sweet gen I would have to guess it was not very good without a load. It was not meant to sit idle which may not be important to anyone at first but in practice things change in a hurry.

[Doug1]

Ever read the long diatribe on increasing the human condition by Tesla ,Leedskinin wrote one as well.
Convert it to math and apply that.