Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.

hanon

Why did Buforn change so radically the writting about the placement of the induced coil comparing his patents from 1910 and 1911?

Could he try to hide the key feature for running the generator? It got me thinking... ???


1910: Induced coil core not touching the electromagnets cores

1911: Induced coil core always touching the electromagnets cores

.

marathonman

Hanon,
Very informative video , would like to know more about this set up. watched other video's he had but this was the best....just wish i knew what he was saying.
as for the last two comments try the opposite like i do with Obama since he is a know pathological liar.

gregg2597

Here is what Iv'e been doing with the Figuera circuit.
I don't see a lot of interest on the multiple taped resister.
I know now that it needs to be a sine wave. And I have that hooked up.
And you have to have various values or you just have a saw tooth wave.
Now Iam putting together a three part transformer and see the results!
Here is a pic.
Gregg

hanon

 Hi all,

A new thread has been opened to discuss about bucking coils: two coils wound in opposite directions (CW-CCW) in order that the induced field of one coil will cancel out the other coil induced field. This thread is promoted by the owner of hyiq.org and hi is proposing a simple design to test and see the results . I like this subject because it appears in many overunity devices, and who knows if it could not be used in Figuera´s 1902 motionless patent

http://overunity.com/15395/partnered-output-coils-free-energy/


Regards




hanon

Hi all,

I want to tell you one story: I started with the Figuera project in october 2012 when I read in many general forums a user posting many times the same message. Just google: Clemente Figuera canarion    ,and you will see.  In summary he told that the system works and that we should replicate Figuera´s patents. I got intrigued because that man was very enthusiatic and open to tell it. In one forum I got his email by contacting with the webmaster.

We maintained a email thread for some months and then suddenly he stopped sending me emails.  In those emails he told me that the system is very simple and that using 12 V and 3A, pulsed with a VFD or similar, as input he got around 3000 watts in the output. He was using one electromagnet and in each side he placed one induced coil. I got surprised because this was not the Figuera design. Figuera always used two electromagnet one in each side and the "induced circuit" -as he called it-  was in the middle.

He also sent me some more designs with two electromagnets and the induced coils in the middle . This was Figuera design. The amazing thing is that those designs had TWO INDUCED COILS in the middle . Why two coils and not just one?, I thought. He also told me to put an aislant between the electromagnets and the coils (the same that it´s being suggested now in the thread of bucking coils  with the loose coupling concept). He also told that I should move the coils in order to find the correct place. Even he told me that the induced coil must have an small angle with respect to the electromagnets. As I didn´t understand why he used 2 induced coils or the aislant I didn´t take care of that design because I thought it was against the logic and it was nonsense. I did not replicate that design. Now in the bucking coils thread I see many similarities with this design. 

I attach here the sketches that he sent me (I already posted this info in a pdf many months ago but probably nobody remember that right now) . In one email he sent one sketch but few minutes later he sent me a second email with the wiring changed and he said to be correct now. He never told me precise data, for that reason I don´t know if the electromagnets polarity was North-South or North-North. He was very cryptic.

In sumary: I think that using two inducers (one in each side) and two induced coils in bucking mode, with those inducers facing North-North then you will have that each inducer field just reach one of the bucking coils. In this case you could excite each induced coil with one inducer field and the induced current in both coils will add up perfectly and maybe the Lenz effect in the electromagnets could be reduced.

I stronly recommend you to follow the thread about bucking coils because it could have some keys for replicating the Figuera 1902 patent

Regards