Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[Doug1]

You should have incorporated the magnetic amplifier control method to control the output to a safe level. You did a great job by the way. It's unfortunate you keep trying to quit experimenting. I hope you know that wont work. It's an addiction to which there is no recovery program. I suspect you will take a vacation from it and come back to build the dc input resistive unit to start it up with out an inverter.

In addition the 08 version uses 7 sets of magnets instead of one giant set. The outputs were combined and there for controllable by simply not connecting any more then needed for a given use.
 

[NRamaswami]

Doug:

Thanks for the kind words and I hope I have shifted the addiction to others. Economy is bad and I have no funds to do any thing here. So that is a very effective anti-dote to this addiction. Secondly we need to come out of the fear that if we do this we will suffer and staff will suffer.     

We have tried several small cores being joined etc concepts and they did not work. We are dealing with cheap to obtain low cost soft iron rods. They need some size to produce results. A cat size device cannot work like a Tiger. If you want a Tiger you need to build a Tiger sized device. Small size devices will not have the magnetic field strength. That is not stated in the formula but it is common sense. This is why other devices use permanent magnets. I have found that if we are use smaller length cores bigger diameter of the tube is needed. That does not reduce the weight of the device involved and it is easier to handle a long tube and then wind insulated wires on it.

Possibly not knowing any thing we did it all wrong as per theory but ended up producing results. Other skilled people can now redo this with significantly reduced size and input. I would request you to recognize that when I first started this in February 2013 I did not know what is the difference between voltage and amperage. How in six months we did it is not clear to me. But we kept trying and Hubbard was the most difficult one to do. We found that the straight pole design to be the most effective one. So we made things simple and wound a large one.

I have tried to reduce the output voltage and increase the amperage but those efforts were unsuccessful. I have checked the voltage on lamps up to 300 volts and it does not work. So an excess output voltage than the lamps are designed to stand is needed to create the COP>1 effect.
I have also tried to reduce the input voltage and that was also unsuccessful. But I must concede that it must be possible for a well trained and well educated scientist to outperform us easily. Ignore the Law of conservation of energy and focus only on Magnets and then it becomes easy. I have tried explain to the best of my understanding but I could be wrong in the explanations.

I believe that if we have used very thick wires like the wires that can handle 100 amps or more, then it would or could have been possible to use lesser turns and give more current to get the same effect. But we invested in 4 sq mm wires that can carry 24 amps and stuck with them. I must also say that the formulas of magnetism are not accurate at all times to all things and shapes. We calculate some thing and do it and the result does not come. So we do the opposite of what is expected to be done and results do come. It is very strange. Therefore I cannot make any assertion that thick wires and lower turns would automatically work.

Fortunately I'm not a scientist nor an academic. I was using my own funds so I could afford to fail. I have actually asked one of my clients who owns many factories but his Electrical Engineer refused to believe us and so he did not do any thing and did not even care to come and check the facts. So what can I do? The device we did is entitled to be patented as I have eliminated any moving parts. But for my own reasons I avoided filing any patents in India or elsewhere and made it open source. If we give some thing good to the community, good things must flow towards us is a rule of nature. So I have made this open source.

One knowledgeable friend did have a look at the device when it worked. He said that the result is not due to magnetism but due to an isotopic conversion of the iron and that it needs to be investigated. But he will not touch the project himself. So what can I do? Rather than leaving it all to dust I have made it open source so others can build upon this. I may well be wrong in the statement that you need to reach beyond the 300 voltage to achieve COP>1 effect and it may be due to the shape of the device and the material used or the wires used. But that is what we observed. Others can now take it forward.

[cap100nf]

Hello Ramaswami.




Thank you very much for the compilation of your research, and for making it available for every one.
Can you please answer a few questions please.


1. In the compilation it is stated 85-90 turns for each single secondary layer. Is it valid for all secondary layers?
2. The primary layers are they also 85-90 turns?
3. Finally it is stated that the soft iron rods shall not be insulated, but in an earlier post here you stated that if they not is isolated they will
    get extremely hot and even can melt. What is right?


Thank you.


/ Kent

[iflewmyown]

hello NRamaswami,
I assume you know that your work is on Patrick Kelly's web site. Are his drawings and text correct? When you measured your device working, did you measure the output voltage at the same time that you measured the current with the amp meter. Both my digital amp probe and my sixty year old analog amp probe give erroneous readings anywhere near a transformer. Were your meters far from the  coil arrangement?
Thanks for your time.
Garry

[NRamaswami]

Thanks for the questions.

The room where we did these experimepnts is a small 7 feet by 10 feet room.  Therefoe the measuring meters all analog only were at a distance of a maximum of 2 or 3 feet from the coil. Not more. I have checked up to 300 volts and 10 amps using a single primary butthere we had 12 layers of secondary wire on the inneride of primary alone. Electrician refused to allow checking on load after that. The output of 620 volts and 20 amps was measured when we connected the secondary to two earth points separated by a distance of about 7feet.  They are placed East to west. I can measure the distance between earth point and tell you if you want.

Ammeter and voltmeter readings were taken at the same time. You connect the Ammeter in series and voltmeter is connected from one point of Ammeter to the other wir so it is in parallel. You can go to www.tmptens.com and see the way measurements are taken for the water turbine. Same electrician measured the 620 volts and 20 amps iutput.

No of turns on the central secondary are lower. 85-90 turns are for the secondary in the primary coil.
Even here depending on whether we used Aluminium or copper wires number of turns varied as 4 sq Al wire is thicker. Secondly number of turns also varied from one layer to another as we were winding by hand. Wires are insulated wires and not enamalled magnet wires.

Actually there is nothing muc here. Use multi layered coils to reduce input but create a large sized magnet.  Use a lot wires and turns to take electricity from the rotating magnetic field.

Regarding the rods they were never insulated but if you excced a certain number of layers for a coil diameter the iron makes a lot of noise and both wires and iron become hot. For a 2.5 inch plastic tube it happens when reach layer 9. Up to 7 layers it can work efficiently and without much of heat. Whatever be the length. However the number of layers increase for this effect to manifest at larger diameter tubes filled with iron rods.

I had been advised i should insulate the wires but I could not afford it.I have stiff opposition from my family an d staff who feel that this project has brought us some kind of bad luck. Whatever photos are available we can post. No videos were taken. Mainly because we were afraid that the magnetic field may affect the equipment used.

If at all there is any thing to say amount of electricity is directly proporyional to amount and diameter and length and so mass of iron used. I do not know why but this is an observatio n made by us