Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[ignacio]

Cuanto más se habla del tema mas se desvía del mismo.
7 electroimanes colectores mas 14 electroimanes inductores, bobinas iguales
14 electroimanes colectores mas 7 electroimanes inductores, bobinas iguales

The more you talk about it but deviates from this.
7 electromagnets collectors more electromagnets 14 inducers, coils equal
Electromagnets 14 plus 7 inductors collectors electromagnets, coils equal

El consumo de electricidad en las 3 ondas representadas ¿es el mismo?
El consumo de los 3 multiplicadores representados ¿es el mismo?

Electricity consumption in the 3 waves represented is it the same?
3 consumption multipliers represented is it the same?

[core]

An old image, by Kekhoo, (I think)  which sumarize the aim of the 1908 commutator

It is not the same as AC!!!!. If somebody do not understand it please stop saying that it is the same as AC

Link to image:
http://overunity.com/12794/re-inventing-the-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-the-infinite-energy-machine/dlattach/attach/150672/image//


Actually this picture is just as inaccurate as the others. If you look at how the device is wired you would see that there are segments. These copper segments are separated by a space. So when the brush is between the copper segments there is no current and voltage. The picture you posted shows an increase from zero to max but it doesn't take into consideration what happens when the brush is between the segments.

In essence you actually has a series of rapid impulses that pass through a resistance. To add to this Buforn call it a "coiled resistance". So you can think of it as a sharp impulse dis-charger that doesn't under any circumstance create a smooth progression.

On page 13 of the first Buforn end of the first paragraph he states the following in regards to operating his dis-charger:

"We consistently change the intensity of the currents that pass through the magnetic field formed by the electromagnets N. and S."

Maybe this is just a phrase of the times? but how does a current, that's responsible for creating a magnetic field, pass through the magnetic field. This almost implies that the magnetic field is already there prior to the current. If that is the case what is creating this magnetic field.

He also states in his patent that the entire effect is created in the primary/primary action of the device. He states that to "use these currents is almost trivial to explain"(paraphrasing) this mean that a secondary winding is insignificant to the creation of the effect. This also means that you only have to concentrate on a primary configuration as this is where the effect materializes.

There are two very important rules, per say, to the device that he states. When I get a minute and find them I will post the translation.

Nice thread

Discharger....REVISED

[NRamaswami]

Maybe this is just a phrase of the times? but how does a current, that's responsible for creating a magnetic field, pass through the magnetic field. This almost implies that the magnetic field is already there prior to the current. If that is the case what is creating this magnetic field.

Is is probable, that since the current that is being used is DC or what Doug1 referred to as Undulated DC, the core would have become a permanent magnet. Since the Primary is place where the DC current is supplied Primary makes the more powerful but oscillating DC electromagnets. It is very probable that in such a case the Y core would also become a permanent magnet core. This also implies that the device cannot exceed certain temperatures to operate. The heat inside the iron must be less for this to remain intact and the device unlike what is depicted must be put inside coolant tanks that must dissipate heat immediately.

[MadMack]

Greetings Core,

Please review the patent text. The brush is in contact with two segments at all times. The circuit is never interrupted at the commutator.

Actually the picture you posted the link to, the "original" is closest, but still not correct. If you look at the commutator jumpers that are shown in the patents you will see this; the end connections each span two adjacent segments. Thus the time spent at the peaks (max and 0) of the wave is twice the time at every other step of the wave.

Mack

[hanon]

Core,


It is exactly as Madmack states. The brush is always in connection with two contacts, therefore the signal is continuous without big sparks. It is a system "make before break" . The patent describes this feature clearly:


Quote from the patent:

...  the brush "O" rotates around the cylinder "G" and always in contact with two of their contacts.

Randy,
About the excitation circuit that I made: I built the electronic circuit with the 555 and two CD4017 . I do not have an oscilloscope so I build one DIY scope this some resistors to attatch to my PC sound card. To operate this electronic circuit you need an scope. In my case with this DIY scope was quite difficult to do many tests because you have to tune it for each test. Therefore it was quite difficult to do the test and be sure that I was injecting the proper signals to the electromagnets. Also I build an schematic which were uploaded by one user to this thread. This schematics required just one center tap transformer and one or two diade bridges and a capacitor. Instead of using a center tap transformer that I do not have I tried to build it with to normal transformers attached. I do not know what I did wrong that this system was heating a lot and I was not sure if it worked properly. I will look for this schematics in case you want to use it. The next time I will get connected I will post it. It is supposed to work fine because it was tested by this user into a simulation program


Finally I devised a very simple system to generate both signals in opposition. It was just as simple as building a composed magnetic field: adding a DC magnetic field + AC  in one inducer, and the same DC field - The same AC in the second inducer. To add or substract the AC field is just to connect it in the same sense or in the contrary . When I designed this system I had already stopped doing test, so I have not test it yet.


Regards


Edit: I have found the schematic done by user maddann. Here the link to his post: [size=78%]http://overunity.com/12794/re-inventing-the-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-the-infinite-energy-machine/msg394315/[/size][size=78%]    [/size]