Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.

MagnaProp

Quote from: NRamaswami on September 25, 2015, 05:20:34 AM
...I strongly suspect that the central magnet emits some harmful radiations...
Sounds like a valid concern until we know for sure what this device produces and if these effects manifest themselves only when higher power levels are used. As someone interested in this device, would it help to only "turn on" this device when it's inside a Faraday cage? Does a Faraday cage stop gama rays, Xrays and such?

scratchrobot

Quote from: core on September 25, 2015, 08:04:36 PM
This thread is infected with people who build nothing and have nothing. My personal favorite are the one's who boldly state "THIS IS MY LAST POST......... I SWEAR IT".... and then naturally return to continue posting  ???

Since its so EZ to claim success then I claim, on this day, that I, Member CORE have a working device. We now have a Figuera device and a Core Device.

Really?.... Are we to believe that a person who can't figure out how to resize a picture to 800 x 600 can figure out Figuera? ???

Sad day...... NRamaswami pay close attention here THIS IS HOW ITS DONE.

This is my last post, ......you lose


That's right I am taking my ball and leaving

- Core
[/glow]



You are just frustrated because you didn't got the same result that NRamaswami got.  ;D

marathonman

Like i said i have solved Figueras 108 year old secrete !
in picture #1 is an early 1900 rotating Dynamo...as you can see their is a north magnet at every other coil and a south every other coil opposite of north. so every time the rotation advances one coil the flux through the coils are reversed . there are basically two halves of the Dynamo in parallel for better amperage.
NOW cut in half......with only one half of the Dynamo in which is a complete circuit..... remove the Magnets and add Electromagnets at every coil North on bottom and south on top. now straighten it up in a line because it is no longer rotating. what you have looks similar to Figueras but wait there's more..... the reason Figueras cut the cores was because in order to eliminate Lenz's law effect something has to be done. as long as you have a north and a south in a coil you will  have the Lenz's effect present .....so how did Figueras side step this effect.........by separating the poles. you can not have the Lenz's law present with only one pole.....sorry it isn't going to happen .
Gentleman i give you Acoms razor: The simplest solution tends to be the correct one. see Figueras never changed the winding's nor the position or the firing of the cores. you still have to mimic the rotating Dynamo's magnets approaching and leaving the coils..... if you don't you will get nothing.
again #3 picture is Figueras design in a nut shell handed on a silver platter......108 years in the making.
he took a rotating Dynamo and made it stationary...kept the same wind pattern and the same firing order.

MagnaProp

Thanks again for the info!
Quote from: marathonman on September 26, 2015, 12:55:40 PM
...by separating the poles. you can not have the Lenz's law present with only one pole.....sorry it isn't going to happen...
I would like to know more details on why this cancels or prevents Lenz. I do not question what you say but only wish to understand it better.

Does the orientation of the coil have anything to do with canceling Lenz? In your drawing Figuera cuts the coils 90 degrees to how the rotating version cuts the coils. So basically he changes the flux in the coil without actually cutting across sections of it. All sections of the coil get the same amount of change at the same time. Is this relevant to the lenz issue? I have drawn the bloch wall in blue and the red arrow is the direction it moves.

marathonman

NO!  it has everything to do with the splitting of the cores and switching at mid way. all the red cores are fired together then all the blue are fired together.....each pair acting as a battery in series just in reverse.just the same as it was a rotating Dynamo.
the north magnet will be attracted to the Iron core as will the south magnet causing a Potential difference by time-varying magnetic fields... ie if you have 50 volts negative north potential and 50 volts positive south potential then you have 100 volts peak to peak potential.all the cores are not fired at the same time. you have to follow the same rules as the rotating Dynamo but it is stationary.
Acoms razor: The simplest solution tends to be the correct one. Figueras took a rotating Dynamo and made it stationary....he changed NOTHING !  except the splitting of the cores.