Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[marathonman]

First Pic Figureas 1908 Patent.... all annotates were added later "NOT BY FIGUERAS" all lines showing connections are incorrect.
Second Pic My Discovery.... all red cores fired together all blue squares fired together North south arrangement Cw-CCW-CW-CCW ect...just like the ORIGINAL ROTATING DYNAMO.
Figueas changed nothing because the original sequence of events of the rotating dynamo are still intact all he did was straighten out the dynamo and separate the cores the firing order are still the same.
Acoms razor: The simplest solution tends to be the correct one.....think like a rotating dynamo....well em...only stationary.

[hanon]

Ah, what a pain tha we cannot look at the picture of original rotating Figuera device from 1902. Finding the source dynamo generator would explain everything.

Yes we can. Here is the link to the Figuera´s rotary device, patent 30376 from 1902: [size=78%]http://www.alpoma.com/figuera/figuera_30376.pdf[/size]


I guess everyone should read the patents deeper, or just read it. This patent is out and translated into english from more than 2 years.


Marathonman, I can not get yet how to beat Lenz Law by powering alternatively both series. Take into account that the original dynamo uses motion to get flux cutting induction along the wires. I do not understand how to simulate movement with your proposal


About the induced coil orientation it has been always a big clue: some infor seems to indacate that the coil is aligned with the electromagnet while other sources seems to indicate to be perpendicular. For example in this link and the image I attach below taken from this link:


http://www.electricidadbasica.net/energias-renovables.htm


Who knows...

[marathonman]

Marathonman, I can not get yet how to beat Lenz Law by powering alternatively both series. Take into account that the original dynamo uses motion to get flux cutting induction along the wires. I do not understand how to simulate movement with your proposal.

Are you serious ....do i have to draw it out with Crayola Crayon guys........ok here it goes, on page 171 i posted a early 1900 rotating Dynamo picture #1 as the magnets advance one coil the flux in the coil/core reverses direction.
WITH EACH ADVANCEMENT THE FLUX IN THE COIL/CORE REVERSES DIRECTION ! see picture #1 then see picture #2
PLEASE STUDY PICS and you will see what i mean.

[marathonman]

I forgot the third pic sorry... flux reversal just like it was rotating.

[forest]

Great! Slowdown a bit please    What is in your opinion the original dynamo modification Figuera done ,before creating solid state version ? Could it be that original dynamo was already Lenz-free and the only thing to do was to eliminate rotor core movement which eliminated magnetic flux drag  ?  Then he cut dynamo into chunks , added additional elecromagnets and commutators to switch currents and create  switching polarity  magnetic fluxes exactly the same as in rotating dynamo.
I wonder if he cut the original dynamo core in chunks right in the first - rotating device patent , but then the arrangement of induced coils was maybe different or he just glued cores again together into ring. That why I asked of original dynamo, because in patent there is ony a schematic representation of idea - it could be that dynamo you found marathonman, which makes the 1902 patent even more interesting (core levitating ? induced copper coils on light "cylinder" in fact rotating almost without friction !???)




Please tell me where I made mistake...