Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 30 Guests are viewing this topic.

Doug1

Marathonman
I understand you want for smaller more powerful cores but you have to consider heat dissipation. If an expensive material allows for a smaller size will it result in over heating under operating conditions like the ambient temperatures it may be subjected to?
Almost everything can be converted to something ells ,hp to ft pounds ,watts to hp, heat to watts. Watts to watt seconds was as small a time I could find, just have to break that down into 60 cycles per second yourself which seriously reduces the force as a constant to about 10 to 15 lbs per set being shifted the distance occupied by the Y coil. Even the number of magnetic lines per sq cm of material and the amount of current density can be converted although not as easy.
  It may sound a bit nutty but a paper clip on a plastic straw provides a quick probe to determine the point of intersecting fields. Has just enough flex to not be rigid and able to trace out the field as it is moved along the coils. It will even vibrate when you find the center point so you can make adjustments in the alignment with out spending a paycheck on expensive equipment.

marathonman

I am aware of the heat dissipation and know that i can use slightly smaller core as opposed to laminate but it has to handle the amount of your projected flux count and not over heat. i will have a small sensor attached to the core to monitor the heat.
I canceled my over seas order because they took to long. i will be ordering a test piece from the above NJ company. i will start with a 1 1/2" round bar of 99.8% pure iron but in the mean time i am assembling some very low tech stuff just to prove my point.
i have a oscilloscope that i will be using to line up the cores to get the phasing right as i am assuming that the phase of the secondary is used to aide the primaries as shown in the cutaway in most of the patents. i am so stupid to have not caught that earlier on in my investigation of his device.
see Figueras was hiding the fact that there was a gap between the primaries and secondary (being properly place) to get the proper phasing but Buforn  not being so cryptic shown the gap in his cutaway drawings. (purposely or not it is their)
if the primary was right against the secondary it would be hit with out of phase signal (BEMF)  but by adjusting the core back it can be timed to be in sink with the phase of the secondary (180 out) to aide the primary reducing the power draw of the primary.
I tried to find the video that HANON posted of the hall sensor dealing with the phasing but i couldn't find it.
you could be a little more helpful Doug but in the long run i will get it right.

PS. PARIS ATTACKS = GOVERNMENT FUNDED TERRORISM !

antijon

Marathonman, you're right about the patent image, but I think it doesn't affect the design very much.

According to Buforn patent 57955:
Quotewe will just have to interposed between each pair of electromagnets N and S, which we call inducers, another electromagnet, which we call induced, properly placed so that either both opposite sides of its core will be into hollows in the corresponding inducers and in contact with their respective cores, or either, being close the induced and inducer and in contact by their poles

@ Magnaprop, I haven't had good success with my recreation of the transformer, but I realized it's operation is completely different than I thought. If you watch Mr. Balush's video, you see the two secondaries' cores side by side, then the primary wrapped around it. This must be an integral part of the design.

Hypothetically, with a transformer, if the current drops on the primary this indicates an increase in reactance, due to an increase of inductance. This is only possible if the secondary produces a field in the same direction as the primary. A normal transformer is the exact opposite, the secondary opposes the field of the primary and reduces it's reactance.

I'm still figuring this out, but if you have any clues let me know. It may not be related to Figueras but still good knowledge.

Found this video which appears relevant: https://youtu.be/tXno_7xXSZs

marathonman

Quote from: antijon on November 24, 2015, 10:31:59 AM
Marathonman, you're right about the patent image, but I think it doesn't affect the design very much.

In YOUR mind maybe NOT mine.

In my mind it changes everything, it simplifies the construction and reduces the cost by over 50 %. three Electromagnets on bobbins, one straight Iron Core and some proper tuning changes everything.