Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

hanon

Quote from: antijon on January 15, 2016, 10:36:15 AM

Flux cutting would require a high magnetic field density that protrudes from the iron and cuts the output coil.


Maybe for that reason Figuera placed the two electromagnets very close in the 1902 patent. To compress the flux lines. Also remember that thesum of the fields B1+B2 = constant, so ..the sum is always at maximun.

A very pertinent video: https://youtu.be/yvVbDQ-z66o

hanon

Forest,
You asked for the original scanned documents. Here I send you the only sentence that you have to understand in this patent. Go and translate it with google if you do not believe my translation.

Doug1

Even in a rotating generator the filed is kept up fairly high all the time fairly steady.Only the position changes as it moves the entire magnet. Without movement and without having the continuous stator core for the magnetic field to return though to complete the magnetic path it would need some changes. Second magnet with stator placed between them and a unique controller. The number of lines of flux penetrating the Y still remains the same in both types of generator. You could use the lift test to determine the amount of flux from a standard field magnet from a working generator with the field powered at its maximum. If your looking for 50 or 60 htz output your cyclic rate will have to be reasonable steady so you wont be able to increase the speed to increase the output unless you want to get more complicated more parts.
  Work your way backwards from Y making the Y the size you need for the output you want. Then build the magnets to drive Y based on what Y is in size. The idea that external power is what is always feeding the field magnet is wrong. It does not even work that way in a rotating generator.

  The field which has a measure of force needs to be kept steady it is the resultant amount of flux which is being shifted.It is the number of lines of flux which is cutting the induced. Even if it is slightly reduced in one to enable the shift of the center point where the two fields collide.With two magnets the number of lines in each are not able to mix so the numbers are not the same as one single rotating magnet. Each one is half as many lines as a single rotating magnet. Slightly higher actually but each inducer is less then what would power a single rotating magnet for same output as a single rotating magnet. No engine which rotates a magnet ever directly supplies any power to the magnetic field.The residual field left over after it stops is all it has to ever start up with to cause an output which is given back to the rotating field to make it stronger until it becomes full enough to operate with enough output to power the field and the external load. That is why you have to flash a virgin,there is nothing there for the engine to rotate.

marathonman

So what you are saying is that once a few cycles have passed the the Figuera device will begin to feed it self suppressing the input. so the original power source is just used to build up the field, after that the device takes over and maintain's it self (Field).

so it sounds like the power source can stay attached being recharged in the process. this was what you were referring to when you said it was being shoved into it's core by the gaining electromagnet. this would cause a sort of kickback to the system recharging the original power source.

a while back i read an article about this guy doing studies on a motor. he said after the motor was run for a while and shut off that it took way less currant and time to restart and run the motor compared to a dry cold start. this is because of the residual magnetic field residing in space after it was shut off.  the said field remained for several minutes after the shut down and as long as the motor was restarted within three minutes the field would still be present.
this of course is what is happening with the figuera device or rather all electromagnetic devices.
but  because of the two dynamic fields between them the field is maintained because of the Lenz law not accounting for it let alone two inductive fields between them.   (Right)


Doug1

Correct. There is enough output to power the field plus the shift if you chose to recharge the source then so be it. It is also a buffer to input power to the filed quicker then the output can supply to the field when large loads are fluctuated or turned off and on rapidly to help prevent a lag in the output voltage. Once running a steady load the source can be removed. The difference from a rotating field is the field is moving physically with the rotating magnet leaving the induced winding and approaching another with enough output to power the moving field and the load. here the magnet is not moving just the field, again with enough power to supply both the load and field from the two magnets and a small portion to run the controller. It would serve every ones best interest to stop calling it a commutator.It does not function as one and only slightly looks it could be made from one.Which it can not. Even I am guilty of wrongly calling it a commutator. You would'nt call a volume control on a stereo a commutator. Just call it the controller.