Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[hanon]

Done new tests with this next method to excite the electromagnets:

http://s26.postimg.org/6a9a1xhdl/Double_offset_ac_generator_for_Figuera_with_2_tr.jpg

Very simple to build. You could give it a try. You just need to adjust the resistor to achieve an always positive signal.  If you use a variac before the transformer for the DC offset you may avoid using the resistor. Just adjust the voltage of the AC which creares the DC offset to get those two positive signals.

Although having good shape of both signals (voltage of 0.95 volts measured along a 0.47 resistor, then I =V/R = 2.0 A. The zero voltage line is marked with this two short black lines in the screen) I have not got good results with my two sets of 3 coils. I think my problem is in other part, not in the exciting signals. Maybe my electromagnets are not mightly enough to get to breakeven. I do not know.

[marathonman]

Cliff; "Been doing a lot of thinking about this thing and just wondering why Cf chose such
a high voltage of 550 volts when he could have tested it at 115 volts using only 2 units.
I strongly believe that the higher voltage is the key to the whole thing.?"

Figuera's test as you say were done long before his final device. and you and you person below you should know Buforn spilled the beans about the voltage which is 100 volts @ 1 amp. it could even be an average through one cycle..... who knows. the device can be made to reach what ever voltage and amperage you want, it's not set in stone.

one thing everyone has to consider is that once the primaries are at voltage there needs to be some amount of magnetic field (Capacitance) in the primaries in order to feed Part G when shoved out of the secondary in the declining phase. i could be wrong but if the wire was to big (less windings) wouldn't their be less inductive kick to the Part G for storage.

another thing people are failing to realize is that once this thing is powered up and running that part G becomes the power supply when looped back to it's self feeding the primaries regulating the currant as it spins through reluctance in the core of part G.
if one wanted to make this thing switch with transistors all you have to do is use PNP's on the positive side to mimic rotation as long as they overlap in a make before break fashion. if the transistors are on the other side the inductive kickback from the declining electromagnet being shoved out of the primary will be blocked from feeding part G and therefore it will not be self sustaining.

Hanon;
I am enjoying watching you bang your head against the table. i know you mean well but part G take care of all the currant change. you are over complicating everything.


if everyone is wondering how to get DC from the output that's AC in the figuera device just use Tesla's way and it is simple. no diodes, resistors or anything else needed.

[Doug1]

Hannon

The phase angle looks good but the magnitude sucks ass. You chose to follow the wrong winding theory which does not account for the self induction value of the coil and core.
  Should of could of, if you look at the patent again the current feeding the coils is controlled completely from outside the coil itself not as an artifact of the coils construction. If you built them correctly and supplied the current as you did they would have gone up in a blaze of glory anyway. I may be ranting again who knows. You don't have too many options for making a stronger magnet in this set up.

[hanon]

Doug,
I am trying to control the current from the external exciter to the electromagnets, not from inside. My winding is just 300 turns of 1mm diameter wire in 11 or 12 layers around the core. I did not take into account the self induction because I am not instructed in this field. Please tell  me what I can do to solve it.  I thought the magnitude was right: maximun current 2A, minimun around 0.3 A, in perfect opposition.

Marathon,
I am trying to simplify it, looking for an easy method to excite the system. It could work with many methods IMHO, not just your DC rheostat part G, which for me is very difficult to build. For now my aim is just getting a proof of principle with a simple design. I am not looking yet for a perfect and optimized design. The method to excite the system that I posted before is really simple, maybe someone else could have a try: just a center tapped transformer with a DC offset. Dc offset  could be done rectifying AC, a DC source,...No waste heat if you could adjust the DC voltage using a variac before rectifying the AC to the required voltage. In this case I think Doug is right: the exciter method is right but my problem is in some other part, maybe the electromagnets. The problems is that I do not know how to solve it. More turns??

[cliff33]

NRamaswami:

"High amperage comes only with high voltage."

There you go again with your total nonsense. My 12 volt 2000watt inverter takes 166 amps from my battery.
Never mind studying electronic theory, just stick with electrical!

Marathonman:

"Figuera's test as you say were done long before his final device. and you and you person below you should know Buforn spilled the beans about the voltage which is 100 volts @ 1 amp. it could even be an average through one cycle..... who knows. the device can be made to reach what ever voltage and amperage you want, it's not set in stone."

No, didn't say the 550 was a necessity. Was it because the 20hp motor used 550?

And we should all know "the higher the voltage, the better to attract the charged aether particles".
Not sure what you mean by Buform spilling the beans. Are you saying that the device is only putting out
100 volts @ 1 amp?
If you want to build a solid-state driver, don't use bjt transistors. They require too much driving power.
Use an N channel and a P channel mosfet. They perform in a reciprocal way, when amperage increases in one, it decreases in the other.
Some of them rated @ 50 amps and require zero amperage to drive  them.