Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 65 Guests are viewing this topic.

marathonman

Erfinder; well put. nothing wrong with drinking a beer with intelligent friends contemplating life's numerous amazement's.

Cadman; no intelligent response will ever be given if that is what your waiting for. deception seems to be our key advisory with no growth in the process.

see it took me a while to except NN also, but once i pulled my head out my back side i learned so much in the process.
it's funny to think it took William Hooper 70 years to prove Figuera's design. that is like Tesla, way ahead of his time. even then Tesla told Walter Russel to bury his knowledge for a thousand years until humanity was ready for it.

if William Hooper would of known about Figuera's device things would of been different. i think Hooper would of been blows away by the simplicity and elegance of His device.
to think two opposing electromagnets would create a very strong E field is crazy until you do the "RESEARCH" into the device. and most of all,  the sheer genius of part G is mind boggling, to split an incoming DC signal into two separate signals using two opposing fields then varying each one individually but in unison is sheer utter genius, not to mention the declining electromagnet feeding the core of part G every half turn of the brush to feed the next high set is down Right amazing.
the man had one hell of a mind on him i tell you that.


marathonman

Quote from Teselkola;
Would you take piano lessons from someone who couldn't actually play the piano, even though he has read a biography of Beethoven?

does that remind you of anyone cadman ?

lancaIV

Quote from: Cadman on August 18, 2016, 10:59:22 AM
darediamond,

I have a question for you that relates to the subject matter of this thread, in particular the 1908 and later patents.

Imagine a hypothetical inducing coil as depicted in the patents.
The coil has a core with 32 cm^2 cross sectional area perpendicular to its length.
There are 500 turns of  wire on this core.
10 volts DC and 1 amp of current flow through this coil.
Suppose this coil produces a flux strength of 24000 gauss which is used to induce an emf in the adjacent secondary y coil.

Without adding any magnets or additional coils, or changing the voltage or amperage flowing through the coil, or the number of turns of wire, how can this coil be modified to increase the flux strength to 48000 gauss?

I know how I could accomplish this but I am curious as to what method you personally would employ.

CM

dear member,
I am not self-blended enough and impressed by your statement ,so I ask you : how ?
Only the Figuera device related or your solution unlimited the magnetic sphere related ?
The coil modified: 2d to 3d geometry,fill factor ?

Cadman

All else equal, volts, amps, wire turns, core length, then doubling the cross sectional area of the core doubles the flux.
The flux density remains the same but people forget the density is per area

http://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/94828/what-is-the-physical-significance-of-the-unit-ampere-meter-in-magnetics