Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[darediamond]

This is from a 2012 version of Patrick Kelly ebook, chapter 3, about Richard Willis generator and a simplified version done from a user called silverhealtheu.

"
The input power supply is fed to an electromagnet but is converted into a pulsed supply by the use of an interrupter switch which may be mechanical or electronic. As can be seen, the arrangement is particularly simple although it is an unusual configuration with the electromagnet core touching one of the permanent magnets and not the other. The magnet and electromagnet poles are important, with the permanent magnet North poles pointing towards the electromagnet and when the electromagnet is powered up, it's South pole is towards the North pole of the permanent magnet which it is touching. This means that when the electromagnet is powered up, it's magnetic field strengthens the magnetic field of that magnet.

There is a one-centimetre gap at the other end of the electromagnet and it's North pole opposes the North pole of the second permanent magnet. With this arrangement, each electromagnet pulse has a major magnetic effect on the area between the two permanent magnets

...
Silverhealtheu.   One of the EVGRAY yahoo forum members whose ID is 'silverhealtheu' has described a simple device which appears to be not unlike the Richard Willis generator above.

The device consists of an iron bar one inch (25 mm) in diameter and one foot (300 mm) long. At one end, there is a stack of five neodymium magnets and at the opposite end, a single neodymium magnet. At the end with the five magnets, there is a coil of wire which is strongly pulsed by a drive circuit. Down the length of the bar, a series of pick-up coils are positioned. Each of these coils picks up the same level of power that is fed to the pulsing coil and the combined output is said to exceed the input power.

"

Look for the similarities with Figuera...

North South for Motor North North for Generator in the motionless MoGen of Silverhealtheu.

[lancaIV]

Ramaswami,
to have one free energy vulgo "overunity" machine is one thing ! 
To reach the "thesis"-level(Doctor-degree,docere=dozieren/teach) another !


The "thesis"-degree,Dr.-title hono(u)r, you get by academy peers ,Professors/Docents !           For honor ! = industrial "open source"
Commercial this "thesis"-level is the "patent grant" ,examination by patent office "peers" !       For industrial production !


                    A patent application gives you the possibility to get object claims examination and approvement or object claims deny !


                                 Anyone are against application for the "patent grant"-ing status : Why ?
                                 Monopole-(market power)?
                                     
                                 
                                 Condition : only examination/peers approvement interests (and/ or cheap mass-production) :
                                 200 estates in the U.N.O. , application only for 1 estate 
                                 but the examination result will become world-wide "technical standart" ! 


                                Second : safety-approvement (TUEV,UAL and other recognized laboratory organisations)
                                Third : Warranty (machine longivity,hazardfree, no rare materials, no ambiental risc )
                                Fourth: scaleabilty

                                = sustainable development       


                               Some grams "machine" are not the breakthrough !
                   It is only the demonstration for a long path -over all instances !


                               Target: each household/consumer worl-wide -private and commercial
                         
                               there are atomic bombs and atomic reactors.
                               there are fusion bombs but no fusion reactors
                   (probably beginning of commercial energy production: 2050,I.T.E.R.)   


                               Now we got informated about high energy conversion densities :
                          MW per " 1 gram machine" as nano-foil (+ two different currents/streams)
http://overunity.com/16727/real-water-power-that-could-be-the-game-changer/15/#.V7rVA9crwSM

               Onced "Impossible !" in theoretical numbers  making this to future standart = NORM !


                                                      some generations before:
                               Trains with more than 20 Km/h velocity ? The cows will becoming mad !
                                                                 Mad-cow-syndrom
                             
           The first  free energy/overunity machines appeared more than 100 years before .
           denied as perpetuum mobile machines(1.kind) or academical withdrawn as 2.kind machines :
                                           ambiental/human health riscs :
            uncontroleable chain reaction with "point of no return"-entering:
                                                      self-destruction

   
            The Messieurs Biot and Savart has been members of the Parish Academie of Science,
            the first institution worldwide which denied the possibility of such machines.

            I reed in one of them bibliography that there has been the hypothesis
            in the 19.century from a french inventor about a
            "watermotor- with perpetuum mobile effect";
            Biot (or Savart) helped him to realize the hypothesis to reality/thesis !

            Neither this french inventor is today known,nor  Biot and Savart and their law
           -outside academies ! 
           We can call them "dissidents": working against the Dogma/Doctrin

       
            Projects risk examples, total professionality/experience and up to billions financial units
            investment and menpower hours :
            Tata Nano,Thyssen Brazil steel plant,Siemens production plant GB

            Friendly partners will become your enemies, meant enemies probably friends and partners
            over the development instances.
            -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Lorentz-Kraft(=force),wikipedia german edition
           
            Biot-Savart law and Biot-Savart force
            https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentzkraft
           
            deutsch/german
Kraft zwischen zwei stromdurchflossenen LeiternSiehe auch: Ampèresches Kraftgesetz Verknüpft man die Formel für die Lorentzkraft auf stromdurchflossene Leiter mit dem Biot-Savart-Gesetz für das Magnetfeld um stromdurchflossene Leiter, so ergibt sich eine Formel für die Kraft, die zwei stromdurchflossene dünne Leiter aufeinander ausüben, was in der Literatur auch als ampèresches Kraftgesetz (nicht zu verwechseln mit dem ampèreschen Gesetz) bezeichnet wird.^[3]
Wenn die beiden Leiter dünn sind und einander parallel gegenüberliegen wie die gegenüberliegenden Seiten eines Rechtecks, dann ergibt sich die schon von der Ampère-Definition her bekannte einfache Formel für den Kraftbetrag      F  12     {\displaystyle F_{12}}  (https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/35bd8bf2dd739f74f6c888ae839d364d7ca8cf8d) der aufeinander wirkenden (nach dem Wechselwirkungsprinzip gleich großen) Kräfte:
      F  12   = ℓ ⋅    μ  0    2 π        I  1    I  2    r     {\displaystyle F_{12}=\ell \cdot {\frac {\mu _{0}}{2\pi }}{\frac {I_{1}I_{2}}{r}}}
Dabei ist     ℓ   {\displaystyle \ell }  die (bei beiden Leitern gleich große) Länge der Leiter,     r   {\displaystyle r}  ihr gegenseitiger Abstand und
      I  1   ,  I  2     {\displaystyle I_{1},I_{2}} sind die Stromstärken in den beiden Leitern.


english translation by google:
Force between two current-carrying conductors
See also: Ampèresches force law

Related to the formula for the Lorentz force acting on a current-carrying conductor with the Biot-Savart law for the magnetic field around current-carrying conductor, the result is a formula for the force to exercise the two current-carrying thin conductors each other, which in the literature as ampèresches power law ( not to be confused is designated by the Ampere's law). [3]

If the two conductors are thin and parallel to each other are opposite as opposite sides of a rectangle, then the already forth known by the ampere definition simple formula results for the amount of force F 12 {\ displaystyle F_ {12}} {\ displaystyle F_ {12 }} of interacting (equal to the interaction principle) forces:

    F 12 = ℓ ⋅ μ 0 2 π I 1 I 2 r {\ displaystyle F_ {12} = \ ell \ cdot {\ frac {\ mu _ {0}} {2 \ pi}} {\ frac {I_ {1 } I_ {2}} {r}}} {\ displaystyle F_ {12} = \ ell \ cdot {\ frac {\ mu _ {0}} {2 \ pi}} {\ frac {I_ {1} I_ { 2}} {r}}}

Here is ℓ {\ displaystyle \ ell} \ ell the (for both conductors of the same size) length of the conductor, r {\ displaystyle r} r their mutual distance and I 1, I 2 {\ displaystyle I_ {1}, I_ {2 }} {\ displaystyle I_ {1}, {2}} I_ are the currents in the two conductors.


Lorentz-force,wikipedia english edition
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_force    somebody reads about Biot and or Savart
                                             Or Laplace/Ampére (force) ?     

                                                        Does this matter ?             
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lorentz-force is the nuclear force ,the only used perpetuum mobile science : the atomic radiation activity during the decay cycle=
                                                                                                                          during elementar transformation


accelerating the force and forced decay by Biot-Savart force(or Laplace/Ampére force)


Lorentz-Transformation gives us e=mc²            c= velocity of light              X²= acceleration        m=result from (M1-M2) decay


Nikola Tesla did a structural change : e=tc²            Minkowski( Einstein was one of his students) RAUM(space)-Zeit(time)

https://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=39663
https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/electromagnetics-and-energy.912307/

                                                             Does this really matter ?

[marathonman]

APPARENTLY YOU TWO LOVE TO HEAR YOUR SELVES TALK.

do we think we can keep the topic confined to Figuera device and not write a book on chatter, PLEASE !

Hanon;

what is your point in posting those devices.? what are you trying to convey.?  even "if" remotely,  they do have some slight similarity what can it do to help a completely differently operating device.?  i am really not trying to make you upset but  those devices operate completely different from the Figuera device.
it would seem to me that only a few people on this web site are actually pursuing a build of the device and the rest are nothing but a distraction and a waste of time,  filling this thread with gibberish and denying those that want to learn.
Rswami;
Don't hold your breath, it won't happen in your lifetime. you and your kind are a distraction to this thread and forum in general.
MM

[darediamond]

Doug

You may please call me Rams if it is easy to use.

I have to decline to accept the bait. In theoretical knowledge you are a Tiger and I am a cat. Not fair game here.

I only shared my experiments and observations.

lancaIV..sir..the one more observation that I need to share is that increasing the primary voltage dramatically increases the secondary wattage. You can reduce the primary amperage by using multifilar coils with plastic iron sheet plastic placed between layers of primary multifilar wire. Magnetism is intense. Input is AC. Cause is increasing inductive impedance in primary.  I can only experiment once in a month now and if I have reportable results I will share.

My coils are fairly large. They are heavy.  It takes time and effort to winfmd them and experiment. 

Marathonman.. here is a deal you cannot refuse.  You tender an unconditional apology to all including Mr. Dare Diamond and I will not post here in this thread. You know I am honest. 

Regards

Ramaswami

But why would my friend, my darling 5&6 Mr.Marathonman nott want you to post on here again? Why did make such request? Definitely the correct practicals and theories made available by you is giving some people heartache.

For Motion in the primary, it is NSNS vice-versa I.e Clockwise to Clockwise and leads connection in parallel or Clockwise to anticlockwise and lead connection of n series.

For Lenz Negation ii the secondary, it is NN vice-versa which is Clockwise to Anticlockwise and lead connection in Parallel only.

[Doug1]

Rams

Oh..This is the difference between transformers and generator. .well. Doug I used soft iron rods and weak residual magnetism is present in about 15% of the rods. They are very weak though.

You can say impurities are the reason.

Can you point out the specific part of the patent thatvsays no residual magnetism is present.

Regards


Ramaswami

Your over simplifying it. For getting there are separate cores. I will look for it later this evening.