Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

antijon

Doug, if you are referring to Tesla's rectifier, or a type of saturable reactor, then I already know what it is. The idea behind that is so far-fetched I don't even know where to start.

Figuera used a resistance for a reason. If anyone here has ever ran a transformer in series with a capacitor, they would know what happens. The inductive reactance is altered, and a transformer stops being a transformer. Now I'm not saying it becomes a generator, or produces OU, but turns ratios and other transformer rules start to change. The problem with using a capacitor to reduce inductive reactance is that it's frequency dependent. But a resistance will do the same thing at any frequency, which is why Tesla used a resistance to start some of his motors.

What I'm saying is, a normal generator uses D.C. Exciting current. The exciter winding has ZERO inductive reactance. So if I replaced the D.C. With AC, what would I expect? A giant inefficient transformer with an incredibly high reactance.

Reducing the reactance is a good place to start. Adding reactance, or using an AC source will give you a transformer.

marathonman

Antijon;

The real question you should be asking yourself is what type of resistance did Figuera use knowing that the patent is drawn and worded in it's most elementary form for comprehension,  thus you are left with wire resistor or magnetic resistor and which one would be most beneficial in the Figuera device assuming it was being used to self sustain and govern it's self with the ability to store a magnetic field for later use.

I really don't think your options are plentiful.

Hanon;

Your not storing kilowatts of energy, just enough to power the primaries and what ever you are using in the function of device. that was your miss interpretation of what was said.

MM

hanon

A table comparing the features of transformers, generators, and Figuera generator and why this has no manifestation of the Lenz effect.

In generators, Lenz is manifested by a dragging in their movement as consecuence of the Lorentz force. In Figuera generator there is no dragging because nothing moves (the induced wires suffer internally the Lorentz force, thus why they must be tightly packed to avoid their movement/vibration). There is no dragging because there is no movement. Lenz exists, but as the only thing that moves are the massless magnetic lines then the work required to move them is almost null compared to move a physical object (armature)

hanon


DA1

 Hi  all   

Free energy   in Thai land  4 kw - 1MKW  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jr7yOPmfCCk#t=89.257504
ไฟฟ้าฟรี   ของ ประเทศไทย


   DA1