Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[ourbobby]

Hello marathonman,
                              In response to your comment about the length of core pieces for the Figueras device. If I were to invert the process, that is use the "y" coils as the excitors, would the increase is size not be as critical? I can see your argument for the size ration to the present configuration, "y" coils x 2 = max output, but cannot quite see it if I want to experiment with different configuations. Your proposal implies any change in configuration would require recalculating the total coil arrangements.


By the way, thanks for continuing to update your information on this tricky system. Perhaps I should build two systems to get the comparisons?

Edit. Would this imply that the larger core would require an equivalent sized coil? thanks

Thanks ourbobby

[marathonman]

If you were to use the Y coil as the exciter then how do you propose to compress the magnetic field lines to match that of a standard generators high intensity field...... you can't !
that is why Figuera used two mono poles to compress the magnetic field lines then reduce one and increase the other to get movement into the secondary while causing the electric fields to be in the same direction being positive and additive.

but if you so choose this route the use a larger center core so the intensity at the end of the smaller outer cores is high.

PS. i have new cores coming as well as a new C core controller compliments of Bridgeport Magnetic's. 6 inch primaries and 3 inch secondaries compliments of Temple Transformer. old ones walked off from old address
Regards,
Marathonman

[marathonman]

Figuera Device.

Regards,
Marathonman

[ourbobby]

Hi marathonman,
                         Thanks for the reply. I have just edited my previous post without reading yours. Anyway I think the answer is as you have suggested. Large core= large coil. Small core=small coil.


I have just bought 3 meters of 25mm rod and am off to the engineer's workshop to use his metal saw. I want to get all the cores exactly the same length. Net build some bobbins. While i muck about with understanding  what is going on i am going to use a modified steeping sequence with overlapping pulses so as to maintain the current flow.


There was one other opportunity that i do not recall reading about and that is bifilar wound coils and for the G circuitry.


Once again thanks for your reply


Regards


ourbobby

[marathonman]

Hummm, so if you agree why are you making them all the same length.?  that seems counter productive to sound scientific reasoning that agrees with the Inverse square law.  WOW !
Yes the approach you are taking with the switching to mimic the brush rotation is sound.
Part G is single layer Inductor with an active moving brush.

good luck,
Marathonman