Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[TinselKoala]

1. I'm not teaching any thing for I have made it clear that I'm not an Electrical Engineer.

It is perfectly clear that you are not an Electrical Engineer. It is also perfectly clear that you are trying to impart knowledge that you _believe_ you have, to others who you think don't have that knowledge. Please look up the definition of "Teach".

2. What I have posted are results obtained and that can be verified and can be replicated by any one.

Where is the replication of your claim about wrapping a transformer in copper? Where is the demonstration that a generator will not work in a vacuum? Nowhere.

3. I do concede that I have not tested the self sustaining part. There is nothing to hide. The output voltage and amperage is very high and cannot be done without help from a trained Electrical Engineer. Safety first for me.

There are plenty of people who can handle high voltage and amperage safely. I am one of them. You cannot provide any proof of any self-sustaining electrical device, and the reason has nothing to do with high voltages or currents.

4. Space ships use only solar arrays and Nuclear materials based thermionic batteries. They can easily carry a powerful alternator..Why don't they do it?

Because something has to turn the alternator, or provide the force to drive linear alternators. It's simpler and cheaper at present to use solar arrays, but there are Stirling-cycle driven linear alternators operating in space as well. Do a little research!

Results that I stated are verifiable and replicatable by any one..Do the experiment and then shout me down..if the results are not there.

Show me one single "replication" of your claim that wrapping a transformer in sheets of plastic and copper will make it stop working. Let's see your own demonstration of this. I want to know exactly how to wrap, because I have transformers, copper, and plastic, and I know how to make the necessary measurements. So when I see your demonstration, I'll repeat it and report my findings. Or, if you have some exact specifications as to the transformer, the copper, the plastic, the measurements you made.... please report them here.

You are making claims that are outrageous, and you cannot support them with real data. So far, anyway. What is preventing you from providing references that support your claims? What is preventing you from demonstrating that you might know what you are talking about? I know.... and so do you.

[NRamaswami]

"Power is not energy, voltage is not energy, current is not energy."

This is your statement.. Pray tell me then what is Energy?

Amplidyne devices produced more output than input. It is in the patents. Patents that are granted. Devices that are used in US Navy and UK Navy ships during world war II.  They claim that every 1 watt of positive feedback the device produced up to 20000 watts of excess output. This is similar to sound amplification only.

[TinselKoala]

You mix things up..

I said Transformers covered with copper sheets all around. Then plastic sheets placed on copper sheets. 

Show me. Make a dimensioned drawing, showing the exact placement of plastic and copper, and give the details of your measurements. Show some outside reference that supports your claim. Tell us why completely metal-sealed transformers still work, but magic copper and plastic makes them not work.

All transformers are made up of magnetising metals. Without iron transformers would not work.

False. Utterly and easily demonstrably false. There are dozens of people laughing at you right now, because they, like me, all have transformers working that contain no iron, no magnetizing metals at all.

When transformers are covered by copper plates in the way I described they do not work.

Also false. Demonstrate the validity of this remarkable claim by showing your experimental work.

Your statement is transformers covered with metals. All transformers we see are covered with metals to dissipate heat but they are not copper but magnetisable metals.  My statement is non magnetic copper sheet covered by non magnetic non metallic plastic. Please post pictures of transformers fully covered with copper working fine..

You are being really really silly. YOU are making the claim that copper and plastic (what kind of plastic? I laugh...) will stop a transformer from working. Many people want to see YOUR demonstration of this. Why do you not show it? I know why: your "experiment" is an error.

In my experiments I have found that if we make the magnet very powerful current simply refuses to go to load. If the magnet is very powerful it simply eats the electricity given to it.

More utter ignorant BS. Now you have more people than just me, laughing at you.

I suggest that you wind a quadfilar coil around plastic tube of 4 inch diameter and wrap on that another plastic sheet and iron rods and then continue the winding in this fashion and after about 18 layers complete the quadfilar winding. Try to send the current through the quadfilar winding to a load and see if the load is able to get any power..

Zero.

Come on, demonstrate! It is up to YOU to provide demonstrations of your ridiculous claims.

Powerful magnet simply eats current given to it. I do not know why it happens. This is a result you can replicate easily.

I do not intend to teach any thing to any one. I'm just sharing the results of my experiments. Nothing more. If I have not done any thing, there is truthful admission that I'm yet to do it..I suggest that you replicate the experiments and then tell me please..

You have shown nothing. You have made several claims that are utter fantasies. When... or rather IF... you  yourself are able to demonstrate the validity of any of your claims, that will be the time for others to try to "replicate" them.

"Powerful magnet simply eats current given to it."

That gets a ROFL, for sure.

[NRamaswami]

Many thanks for accepting at least one of my statements that I'm not an Electrical Engineer.

I used a ready made 50 volts 16 amps step down transformer to do the experiment. It did not work when covered in the way I indicated.

The other large 18 layer device produced very strong magnetism but the current would not go to the lamps and power them up.

As I said when I time and money are available I do the experiments out of interest. I have tried to replicate the Alfred Hubbard device without success todate. However I do know one thing. The outer 8 coils are wound in this fashion. the first four coils are wound in clockwise direction and the next four coils are wound in ccw direction and only then in all the 8 coils magnetism is produced. Otherwise magnetism is not produced in the last four coils.

I will check your statement on the alternators working in space. My knowledge is limited and I continuously learn.

There is no intention to teach and only intention to share the results.

I strongly suggest that if you can handle high voltages and high amperages, please replicate the experiment of Figuera as described by me. And see the output voltage and amperage. And please be honest with results.

[TinselKoala]

"Power is not energy, voltage is not energy, current is not energy."

This is your statement.. Pray tell me then what is Energy?

Amplidyne devices produced more output than input. It is in the patents. Patents that are granted. Devices that are used in US Navy and UK Navy ships during world war II.  They claim that every 1 watt of positive feedback the device produced up to 20000 watts of excess output. This is similar to sound amplification only.

Energy is the ability to perform work. Energy is conserved. Volts, amps, watts: Not conserved, not energy.
Energy is measured in Joules (in the SI system). Amplidyne devices do not produce more _energy_ output than input. Go ahead, take the Amplidyne patents and make something from them that is self-sustaining, or that produces more energy out than in. You cannot.

The WATT is a measure of POWER not energy. I have a device right here -- a transformer that has no iron or any other magnetizable metal in it -- that produces 30,000 Watts output power from only 75 watts input. Why is it not self-sustaining? I know why.

At this point I doubt that you even understand "sound amplification only", if you don't understand the difference between a Watt and a Joule.