Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 51 Guests are viewing this topic.

iflewmyown

NRamaswami
First I would like to thank you for posting all this information. I spent six weeks full time last year trying to duplicate Figuera's device and failed and I am very happy to see some positive results. I believe you have given me enough information  to replicate except for one detail. You mention iron rod for cores. In this country there are many products still called iron but they are in fact steel. Many experimenters here use steel welding rod that has been either painted with lacquer or oxidized with rust for electromagnet cores. Did you use something similar or is iron rod much more common in India? I can buy cast iron rod for dollars a pound or pure iron rod but it is dollars per gram. I hope you can help.
Thanks
Garry

NRamaswami

Hi:

Thanks..We used soft iron rods. You go to junk shops and these rods would be available. If you get steel only it is not a problem really. Steel is supposed to retain some magnetism but when we apply AC, you do not need to worry about it really. For AC would demagnetize any magnetism that is present. We did not have any insulation for soft iron rods and did not bother about hystersis loss or eddy current loss. One of my friends criticised me for not covering the rods with insulation but we simply cut costs. We bought from junk shops to cut costs. 

This device is very very simple to make.

Create a powerful high voltage high amperage secondary in module 1.

Then create a step down secondary in module 2. But step it down to some where near or slighltly higher voltage than the input of module 1.

Now you can simply power the source of the power for module 1 from the output of module 2. Since the output is higher in module 2, the remaining output is used for useful work.

If you can handle high voltages and high amperages,  build more modules than that and make the last module a step down one.  Higher the voltage in the device output, higher would be the amperage. This is the difference here.

But be extremely careful..The voltage that comes out is very high and Ammeters do not show any amps when the voltage is up to 250 volts when they are not connected to load. When it went up to 630 volts the Ammeter showed 20 amps at no load and that indicates a very strong current is also present as the voltage increases.

This will require a lot of man hours and winding will have to be done by hand as all wires are thick insulated wires. It takes a lot of time, effort and money. If it is going to be very costly to replicate in US, we can do it in India since we have already done the project here. We will only need to build the second core now, insulate every thing with plastic and paper and then do this experiment. The step down part requires expensive copper cables which are highly insulated with thick plastic or rubber insulation like those used on the batteries of 5 Kw inverters. They should be able to carry 100 amps of current at least. That is where it gets costly here in India. Another cost is man hours. It costs money to get both unskilled labour and skilled people. Skilled people are needed only for oscilloscope and that kind of stuff but I'm not worried about it as we now know the device performs best under the conditions described. We have used pulsed DC also and the device does not perform well in pulsed DC. I do not know why for I expected that the impedance would be lower in pulsed DC and the results should be better in pulsed DC but to the contrary only when we apply AC we get good results in the secondary. Possibly when we provide a feedback current, the lower efficiency of pulsed DC would be compensated I guess. But guesses are just guesses and experimental results are different from our expectations and calculations.

Since many of the people were going wrong here I posted the experimental results.

Do not bother about steel or any thing else. Ac will demagnetize any magnetism present. Even if it is present, do not worry. Just take action and see the results..Do not go for expensive materials and cut costs..This project has eaten a lot of my money..


hanon

Hi,

What about using 3 light bulbs or 3 heaters in series to reach the 630 volts: 220 V + 220 V + 220 V . Maybe you could use some heaters (resistors) to test the output in a simple way.

Good luck with your tests.

Regards

NRamaswami

Hanon:

Three lights would not consume 630 volts. Lights would burn out if the voltage exceeds 270 volts. We need to step them down before we can give it to any load. Same is the case with heaters.

I can not take risks. We would not give any voltage higher than 250 volts to any load. I'm not experienced in high voltage experiments and this is both high voltage and high amperage and is very risky.

So we would better take safety measures than take risks..

NRamaswami

I just want to make one acknowledgement for the results of my experiments.

I was mentored and trained by Mr. Patrick J Kelly PJK who has shut down his website. I emailed him on Feb 8, 2013 when I had no knowledge on these subjects and Patrick asked me to try to replicate Hubbard and then guided me. The guidance was not on point and there were many misconceptions. Then Patrick had a health problem and he retired. He has now given his website to another person in Europe.

I have not mentioned Patricks name for without his consent I did not want to disclose his mentorship but only now I have received an email from him complimenting me and approving my desire to acknowledge this support. He is the person who planted the seed for doing all these experiments in me and without his mentorship and guidance we would not have come to where we are today. All credits go to Figuera, Hanon and Patrick..Without Hanon Figuera would have remained in the shelves..

if you look closely at Figuera's designs and patents he advocates using the foces of magnetic attraction rather than the forces of magnetic repulsion. However in the one we are considering he has combined the effect of both the forces of magnetic attraction and magnetic repulsion together to get a higher output.

To be honest, we also did not believe the results initially but when the ammeter burnt out we knew that current is there.

If you look closely at Don Smith patent on generating energy from capacitors which are suspended on high voltage and high frequency magnetic rod, Don Smith has omitted the fact that the magnetic rod must be placed between the two opposite poles of two primaries.  Once that is done the rest of the results would fall in place.

So only due to the Guidance of Patrick I was able to initiate and start the experiments. When he left we persisted with our efforts and got the results. He has read the forum posts and is very appreciative of me and I feel really very obliged.