Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[bajac]

Kehyo,

As I said, I will experiment and test the concept. If heating occur due to Eddy currents in the aluminum bars, then, I will replace them with something non-metallic. Thanks for the advice.

Bajac

[kEhYo77]

Can't wait for the test results, your setup looks promising.
You're welcome

[Farmhand]

I have compared the designs from Clemente Figuera and Thanes Heins and concluded that the 100 years old concept is more efficient. The following are the bases for the conclusion:

Can you see a pattern between the apparatus of Figuera and Heins? Figuera's design consists in placing a secondary coil between two primary coils. Meanwhile, Heins' design shows a primary coil between two secondary coils.

As I already explained in my paper about the Figuera's apparatus, the induced secondary magnetic field is pulled away from the inducing primary coil by the other primary coil. That is, there is no magnetic fields interaction between the inducing primary coil and the induced secondary coil. However, this is no true for the Heins' apparatus.

First, the Heins' apparatus found in this link:

http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/16180925?hostedIn=slideshare&referer=http://www.slideshare.net/ThaneCHeins#

indicates that the magnetic fields of the two secondary coils must interact with the primary in order for the apparatus to work. Moreover, in order for the Heins' apparatus to have an optimum performance, the load on the secondary coils must be matched.

If you already read my article, you can see that the magnetic field distribution of the Heins' design and shown in the above link is not correct. Because the magnetic field does not have a beginning or an end, it is not possible to have them flowing within the iron cores, only. Therefore, the secondary magnetic fields must cross the air gap windows of the Heins' device to reach and interact with the only primary coil. When the loads connected to the secondary coils are the same, the net influence of the induced fields on the primary coil is zero. The effects of the secondary coils onto the primary are null and it can say that the Lenz's law effect has been mitigated.

Second, if the secondary loads are not properly matched, the resultant of the secondary magnetic fields will react with the primary field in such a way as to oppose the primary magnetic field. As a consequence, the effects of the Lenz's law are not completely cancelled and the current through the primary coil will increase. And,

Third, because of one secondary coil, the Figuera's transformer should have lower output impedance than the Hein's transformer. Having two secondary coils increases the magnetic flux losses and the wire resistance.

The Heins' transformer should work better if the two secondary coils are connected in series to add their voltages. In this way you will always guarantee that the secondary magnetic fields are properly matched.

Finally, I have finished the construction of the primary and secondary coils. See my progress in the following photos: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/405/bobinasprimarias.jpg/

Bajac   

Hi Bajac
I assume you are referring to the BiTT setup of Thanes ?

I've done some reading of the Figuera documents but I don't see where free energy or negating Lenz law is mentioned. And anyway I don't think that two secondaries in Thane's setup
if they are evenly matched would negate Lenz effect in total or there would be no output.  No matter if the secondary does not appear to react on the primary because any output got from the secondaries enters the system by way of the primary.

Do you dispute that any energy utilized from the secondaries enters the system by way of the primary. Have you seen anything measured in the Watts range not mW range that
would indicate more energy out than is input by way of the primary ?

If a primary induces a magnetic polarity in a core and an output is got from a secondary then Lenz Law was in action or the energy transfer was not by induction.

Anyway I'm wondering where Clemente Figuera mentions free energy or the negating of Lenz Law.

Could someone point out where he mentions free energy or the negating of Lenz Law please or whatever it is that "implies" that ?

Cheers

[bajac]

I have finished all the mechanical work related to the electromagnets. I mounted the electromagnets on a 2 ft x 4 ft base with extra space available for mounting the driver components. I have posted three photos:


http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/805/cimg4013.jpg/



What is left is the wiring and the electronic driver for generating the two input voltages.


I am planning on experimenting with two types of drivers, the series resistors as shown in the patent and a stepper motor driver.


We are getting close to the truth!


Bajac

[bajac]

Farmhand,

Yes, I was referring to the BiTT unit.

Figuera does not explain how the extra energy is generated or where it comes from. However, his patent does state that the apparatus is for generating electricity without fuel and it also states that the amount of power is sufficient for industrial applications. In one instance, he stated his desire to power the big steam ships with his generator. Hanon has posted a lot of newspaper citations and articles of the time referring to Figuera. Hanon has done an important work rescuing the historical data and putting the pieces together.

Neither Figuera states that the over unity is due to the manipulation of the Lenz's law effects. That explanation is given in the paper that I posted in the forum. The answer to some of your questions is found in the published paper. I would encourage you to read it and let me know if you have any comments or concerns.

The effects of the Lenz's law are always present when inducing currents in coils through magnetic fields! The Lenz's law effect is the mechanism used in physics to prevent having a device with outputs larger than the inputs. In other words, the Lenz's effect is what prevents the standards transformers and rotating generators from becoming perpetual machines. What Mr. Figuera and others have proven is that there is a way for mitigating the effect and convert these machines in truly fuel-less generators.

Still, the latter does not answer the question where the energy is coming from or what energy is being transformed. The answer to these questions will also require an overhaul of the existing theory and rewriting existing physics and engineering books.

Thanks,
Bajac