Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Doug1

IMO I do not think coils S,N,Y actually meen south and north pole faces. Studying the layout closely I think the Coils S and N are facing each other with the same sign pole faces.The need for seperate core peices is so the field caused by the pulse "on" travels through the other two coils opposite (y+n)or (s+n)so the direction of induction on the center coil and the off coil are the same. Current is added back in series with the on impulse acting upon the off coil through the power source. So if the on impulse was 12 volts + the feild would project through the two other core peices and coils.The reaction on the center coil would act like half a sign wave be it up or down. The outer coil which is off would induce in reverse direction of it's on state at a lower voltage or amperage but would add to the source voltage in series.A clever way to use as much of the feild as possible drawing in and using the lesser force on the far side of the induced coil used to power the load. Im not sure if enough current could be produced to remove the starting power source or not. The only way that could work is if there is unequal abillity of inducing a magnetic feild in a core piece when comparing voltage to ampere. Meaning if I use 1 volt and 100 amp on a core will it be the same measure of gauss feild as compared to 1 amp and 100 volts using identical cores and windings. So that the load could be used in part as a source once it is started even if that ment it has to be stepped up or down to add to the impulse field the strongest magnetic feild that it can produce without taking away from the productitvity of operating the load.Boy that was a bitch to explain that thought.

hanon

Quote from: Doug1 on June 17, 2013, 10:24:55 AM
IMO I do not think coils S,N,Y actually meen south and north pole. Studying the layout closely I think the Coils S and N are facing each other with the same sign pole faces

Doug, you could be right. I had already noted that in the whole text of the patent there is no reference where it is explicitly stated that "N" means north and "S" south. In fact it is just written: " Suppose that electromagnets are represented by rectangles N and S. Between their poles is located the induced circuit represented by the line "y" (small). "

It is also curious the way of naming the induced circuit:  "y"  , and the clarification has always intrigued me:  "y" (small)

iflewmyown

Doug,
Could you post a simple diagram of what you mean? I have read this twice and I'm still not sure.
Thanks Garry

hanon

I have been thinking that a possible configuration for Mr. Figuera 1902 motionless generator http://www.alpoma.com/figuera/docums/30378.pdf is based on exciting the coils with a two-phase AC current in order to create a rotating magnetic field in the generator (as Tesla´s egg of Columbus). In this case the 1902 generator would be also composed by two unphased signals delayed 90º as Mr. Figuera did it in his 1908 generator.

I would like you guys have a look to D'Angelo patent www.rexresearch.com/angelo/us2021177.pdf. In figure 15 (XV in romans numbers) it is represented a generator very similar to Figuera´s 1902 generator. D'Angelo excited his generator with the unphased signals represented in figures 5b and 5c  (V-b  and V-c in romans)

More info about D'Angelo: http://www.rexresearch.com/angelo/angelo.htm

Please comment your opinion about this patent. Do you see any paralellism between Figuera´s patent and D'Angelo´s patent?

Doug1

I dont know if I will get time to make a drawing or not over the week end. Work consumed all my time over the last week. Now i have a pile of work to look forward to at home.Im exhausted just thinking about it. Had a look at DeAngelo's patent read most of it in the dark at 3:30 am just to be able to read it without interuption. Those compound windings are madning to follow.He must of learned how to make his own contact segments from scratch so he could layer them anyway he wanted. I would like stay away from moving parts and brushes but i do see the simlarity in the theory of operation.Clever use of graduated combinations on the stator poles which could be a useful idea. You were very fortunate to stumble on that patent thank you posting it. Everyone is wakeing up and so my free time is gone like a fart in a typhoon. Being on the computor is a an attractant for the people around you to start asking why the sky is blue and why water is wet or did you see the latest video of another stupid pet and or child.