Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[ALVARO_CS]

Bajac
I´ll post some pics tomorrow. My experiment and setup was not built to have accurate measurements,only to find if there was  a Lenz effect at full load (shorting the coils)
What I saw everywhere when describing types of generators, (or/and induction caused by magnets) was ONE magnet facing a coil (with /without ferro core) moving forward to the coil or going over at 90 degrees.
In the Muller dynamo, there is ONE magnet moving between two coils, but the only time I saw two magnets moving by both faces of a coil was in a video from a Russian guy. (will try to find)

Not wanted to discourage you, and even grateful for your contribution

It has been stated many times all along this thread that the grace of Figuera invention, was based in a way to generate electricity via induction WITHOUT the undesirable Lenz law effect.

Sooo, still a wide field for experiments.

[bajac]

Thanks Alvaro.


We are going to build the machine as shown  in the attached document. We first are planning on running the machine with only two diametrically opposed coils. After recording the performance, we will move on with more coils. If over unity is still not achieved with this coil configuration, we will move on redesigning the shape of the coils to have one horizontal layer of coils similar to the one presented in figure 14 of Flynn's patent #5,455,474. A whole set of experiment will be run on this coil configuration. If over unity is yet not achieved, the coils will be reconfigured to have one coil turn overlapped another coil turn (not more than two layers something similar to the figure shown posted by Cadman on his reply #1502.


I am not being discouraged by the failure claimed by other people. Most of the successful inventions go through a similar process. What some people don't realize is that minute changes in the way the experiments are performed could cause extraordinary improvements on the results. That is why is important to share all the conditions and every detail of the experiment being carried out.


I also wanted to ask, why do you call the full load condition the same as the short circuit condition? The short circuit is a fault condition and the currents produced under it can be tenth or hundredth of times higher than the full load operation. The full load condition is the ampere value that keeps the temperature of the coils within rated values. Under a short circuit condition you can in fact experience great breaking forces. But it does not necessarily mean that over unity under full load cannot be achieved.


I also want to clarify that is not possible to avoid the Lenz's effect. We can only mitigate it.


Thanks,
Bajac

[bajac]

I missed the attachment!

[Fernandez]

The pic below represents coil A. Coil B is almost the same as coil A. You need to use thick wire. There is no truth to a high voltage transformer giving FE. This includes flybacks and Tesla coils. The thicker the wire the more natural electricity it contains.

When you tie the secondary of coil A to the primary of coil B this will CLOSE the magnetic circuit. That's simple to understand, think of a closed iron ring. It creates a closed magnetic circuit. If you get offended too bad, be honest with yourself all ideas presented on this forum and others globally are the same re-hashed garbage that don't work.

I said, "Magnetic fields of the 3rd order". This is a NEW term to the OU community. Who else speaks of this......... nobody. Many of you think you are smart enough to figure this out by yourself. Sorry you are not. I have a team (and they disagree with this) Figuera had a team/co-worker. Tesla had brilliant assistants. The list goes on.

My second paragraph is important to all FE devices. As Figuera stated (and I will paraphrase) "The primary is an exciter coil and excites the secondary, and THIS is also a exciting coil"
Figuera was working with magnetic fields of the 3rd order, this phrase has been written out of history because its discovery contradicted some of Faraday's experiments. I' about talking about stuff written OVER 100 years ago and you will never find in todays modern writings.

Start simple, as stated in my last post. Dont get complicated and find a partner/team to work with. Keep it simple a battery and coils is all that Figuera had........Thats it.



   

[Fernandez]

Let me add to my last post.

The core of coil A & B are of PVC. This allows for simple addition of IRON for experiments. Again I will say the best iron to use is the one found in the trunk of your car. Thats a tire iron, go to a junk yard and get as many as you can find. You will have a lifetime supply of cheap usable iron.

When you get to the point that you want to automate your impulses, and they MUST be impulses. DO NOT waste time building a circuit from scratch. Thats for people with WAYYYYY too much time on there hands. For $40 bucks you can get a Basic Stamp Homework board. Use this as your impulse driver. You only need to add transistors / Mosfets for the power drivers. To add to this you can pre-program numerous pulse applications and run over 100 test's in a matter of hours.

I have given more valuable and good direction then anyone else in the OU community. What you decide to do is your prerogative. Enough info has been given to keep you busy for the rest of the year......... So........ its your choice.

GOOD LUCK!