Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[gyulasun]

My question is...( because I have never done it ) when you connect an analog Multimeter to rectified DC does the needle go back and forth... LOL ( my assumption is that the needle doesn't have time to swing both ways...)

Sorry I have almost missed your question, have been busy. Yes the needle has it own inertia, however small mass it may have and it may be trembling at a specific deflection and staying there trembling.
There are analog meters which are not based on a moving coil deflection system for an input current (voltmeters also deflect for current initiated by it in the coil)  but they have an iron piece to which the needle is fastened and the iron piece can move into a stationary coil.  In this construction the overall moving mass may be high enough (due to the mass of the soft iron piece) so the inertia is probably higher than for a moving coil, meaning less likelyhood to follow the amplitude changes of a 50 or 60 Hz AC wave.

Also...what is better...clipped off DC from a bridge rectifier or a oscillating half square wave from a 555 ( or arduino or etc.. ) which is more efficient...

Question is what you wish to use the two waveforms for? If you drive a MOSFET switch with them, then the square wave is always better for switching to close and open the switch suddenly.  It is another question what you control with the switch.

Gyula

[RandyFL]

Question is what you wish to use the two waveforms for? If you drive a MOSFET switch with them, then the square wave is always better for switching to close and open the switch suddenly.  It is another question what you control with the switch.
Gyula

I originally was going to run a stand alone portable AC ( air conditioner ) 120 volt ac 60hz...

On another subject...I was going over the schematics on building AC or DC power supplies and have been fascinated by transformer less power supply circuits...I might just settle for something that's already built ( and not live dangerously )...

Lastly...I have started building a new circuit ( 555, 4081 and 4017 s ) with the correct ohms and heat sinks to test a transformer that was wired with either 14 or 16 AWG magnet wire ( 400 turns )...

I wonder if Wonju is ever coming back...

All the Best

[NRamaswami]

Gyula:

I thank you very much for your kind words. Yes it will need to be given to third party audit and measurements and we have to find out how and why AC input was able to suddenly gain so much output. Secondly as noted by the Professor we need to check whether the voltage and amperage readings would still apply if given to a load. If it still shows then it is a significant thing for solving the energy problems of the world. Others are also replicating the device and I have provided practical construction instruations to them and some of these are competent electrical engineers. Let us wait and see if they can apply it to loads and provide information whether the output is higher than the input.

On Pulsating DC device I have no doubt in my mind that the output is higher than the input. The reason is simple. The coil was wound with air gaps between adjacent turns. This has allowed to air to move in to cool the heated iron plates and coils and in this process the moving air molecules get charged. When we increased the voltage to 250 volts and gave the current through diode bridge rectifier the frequency increased to some thing around 116 hertz at 250 volts. This is one way pulsating DC.  This was sufficient to exceed the ionization potential of some molecules which became ions and provided extra electrons to the coil as the air moved through like a spiral along with the helical coil and this excess electrons came out of the output. This is why even after counting all the losses we had a higher pulsating DC voltage at the output than the input. A higher voltage in DC essentially means a higher amperage. This is the first device described by Cater and for input from a battery Cater indicates frequencies in several hundreds would be required. He indicates a range between 25 Khz to 50 KHz.  Probably there is a frequency voltage curve just like the ampere turns curve for the ionization potential of air molecules and if we provide pulsating dc at higher frequencies a lower level voltage and amperage would do to create a higher output. When the frequency increases the input amperage goes down and the output amperage would go up if the voltage increases. One of the easiest ways to do that is to use just two wires as a bifilar coil and send pulsating dc through it at higher frequencies. I have already tested these things. Unfortunately the Electrician who did all this along with me is no more. If he is available I would be able to give more explanation and practical demonstrations. There are patents on using the ionization potential of gases for reducing pollutions. I cannot give more accurate information on this though for professional reasons. There is no violation of law of conservation of energy as the excess energy came from the ionized air molecules moving along with the wire. The air gap between the wires is responsible for this. This actually provides a method for reducing electricity bills at our homes and offices. It is not a self sustaining generator or self looped back generator but is a device that provides higher DC output than input. Nothing more.

Regarding the AC input device we need to give it tot he lab and measure the results. This will be done some time in July.  I again thank you very much and post the results if the High Voltage lab confirms or if the replicators in different countries who are far more competent than me are able to report their findings.

[RandyFL]

I skipped the 10k resistors to the BDX53 s and went for 4.7K resistors to the BDX53 s on my original build... I have 2.2K resistors for my 2nd build and I have ( will ) put heat sinks on each BDX53... Also on the 2nd build I will include seven .2 OHM resistors and one .1 OHM resistor after the BDX53 s ... that should give the transformers enough juice to the gaps and the secondary s...

I have concluded that a 10 position dual wire terminal block with 2 sets of 5 position terminal jumpers ( Molex ) is the way to go for the 10 watt resistors... I have wound a set of transformers with 14 AWG magnet wire ( 400 turns )...

I might have to buy another 6 foot iron rod from Ed Fagan Inc. and just make one transformer... overkill... but I'm getting impatient...

[Doug1]

Randy
  If you had an E I core transformer, and you wanted to use the I to measure the strength of the field by using weights to see what weight the I section would be pulled apart at Im going to guess you could do that set up. If then you wanted to see how many different winding set ups you could make to get a specific holding power say one pound. How many different winds or portion of wind could you come up with using different sources of power to operate the coil and get a one pound lift/hold?Depending on the wire size and input it would be a lot of possible combinations. Late 18 early 19 hundreds they did not have all these exotic electronics to work with. Until you figure how it was done in the past to find out what it is your actually trying to do in the core there is little point in working on the exotic.