Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 23 Guests are viewing this topic.

forest

I think we are missing the whole picture. Figuera went from the original idea of modyfying dynamo generator to the final arrangement which is in his latest patent and which is not explained clearly enough apparently.In meantime he patented two other designs using two different principles. In all cases the essence is what he understood with his first rotating machine.
He used both opposite and the same magnetic poles, depending on design, he also used phase change probably to shift opposite poles Bloch wall in one of his patent.If I could have resources I would start from the beginning, trying to find what kind of dynamo he modified in his first patent...

RandyFL

Quote from: forest on June 29, 2015, 02:49:04 PM
In all cases the essence is what he understood with his first rotating machine.

That is my point... I think Woopy captured that basically in his first video on the Figuera...Had Woopy used thicker wire or used all of the transformers we would have seen this whole picture clearer...

I think its just a matter of time before Bajac posts His results and adds another piece of the puzzle...

Cheers

PS could I have all the patents location so I can basically read them ( I thought I did awhile back ).

hanon

Quote from: RandyFL on June 29, 2015, 03:51:58 PM
PS could I have all the patents location so I can basically read them ( I thought I did awhile back ).

Don't worry, you are not the only one that has been working in this generator without reading the patents. I can see that you dont have even a copy of the pdf files in your computer.

Never is late to look for the original patents instead of others interpretations of the original

Fernandez

Quote from: RandyFL on June 29, 2015, 08:19:48 AM
I don't understand...

We went from the " Figuera " being the next best thing since sliced bread back to wrapping a coil around a nail...


Never stated "wrapping a coil around a nail" I understand your frustration because your hard work and ideas have gone nowhere.
I simply disclosed how to move a field with little to no moving parts.

Maybe it helps people here like Hannons translations of the patent. Jerking around with LED's goes nowhere ..... A simple fact.

Figurea studies the interaction of magnetic fields in a dynamo. Why aren't you?

Good luck.

NRamaswami

Hi Hanon:

I can try to show a Figuera device provided one cheating trick is allowed to me. I donot have sufficient coils as they are in another project.

I will try to show three primary coils and two secondary coils as depicted in a straight pole formation. I will need to use high resistance lamps as resistors to control the input. I cannot guarantee COP>1 output or something like that but I will show how the Figuera coil was built. Let me see if the 12 volts and 16 amps transformer is available. If it is availble then we can certainly show cop>1 performance. I will use AC.

The coil requires a lot of iron The iron and coils that I have is used for another different device under testing which I'm not interested in disclosing as I want to file a patent for it. Unfortunately we have not come out of the economic problems yet and I cannot further invest in this project. We have tried to make small coils and then ended up making the mistake of cutting the coils many times and so we do not have good continuous coils for being used in the secondary.

Unfortunately people do not seem to understand that this is a Generator. It is not a table top device. If I understand correctly Each primary was at least 3 feet length. Each secondary was at least 1 feet in length. If you put 6 such primaries and 5 such secondaries as a single pole it is the most efficient configuration but the length becomes at least 23 feet. If the primaries are 4 feet and the secondaries 1.5 feet then it becomes 32 feet in length. In my Opinion the devices were at least 3 feet in diameter to avoid saturation issues. It is not really appreciated that this is a very expensive device to build. It is very simple to build once you understand it.

Every electromagnetic motionless Generator small one will weight in the 1 to 2 tons category. The prototypes that I have done are about 200 Kgm in weight easily. So far I have purchased 350 kgm of Iron and iron powder for this project and spent a lot of money. It is only when I saw that the flux present in the Primary coils are not being used I also used to wind the secondaries on them to make the output increase in a small device. But we face the problem of Votlages not merging if the phase and frequency between the 5 secondary coils do not merge. Only when they merge without aiding we have a good device. So some tweaking is always needed in the device named after me but in Figuera this problem is absent.

Figuera used Pulsed DC of a different wave form than normally seen and using pulsed DC requires a lot of iron. Approximately 4 times the mass of iron and 4 times the length of coils used while using AC. So please understand how simple but how difficult to implement this project is for common people. It can be used as a community project to generate power but how many individuals can afford it is not clear to me as it is a one time investment but very expensive by our standards.

I will try to show a small video of the device in the next one or two weeks.