Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[ALVARO_CS]

Thanks hanon

remember how he defines two positioning ways (as seen in the two drawings):

several groups consisting each in two inducers with an induced in the middle,
A-placed one besides the other,
and B-  placed one after the other

Something intriguing, in B description, is about placing the top of the induced cores in the sinus of the inducer (inside ?)

Also intriguing is to place a second induced (smaller) inside the core of the induced
(would it be hollow ?)

Too many questions

hasta pronto

[MagnaProp]

I'm thinking the inducer coil should be far away from its iron core and that all cores should be placed very close together. With a larger air gap between the inducer coil and its core, its collapsing field goes into the central core since that's the easiest route for it to take due to core's idea of magnetostriction between the closely spaced cores.

...Also intriguing is to place a second induced (smaller) inside the core of the induced
(would it be hollow ?
...

I read it to be hollow as well.

[core]

With the exception of Garry, the underlining principle went right over your head!


MagnaProp, you need a CLOSED magnetic circuit, that is an open magnetic circuit you are presenting, you will loose the energy from the ends of the core. That's is a simple fact, nothing special will happen.

Hannon, the magnetostriction effect is a freebee tool to achieve a result. It is not the source of free energy, with out it you would have to expend energy to Open and Close the magnetic circuit. The magnetostriction effect is a LOW COST solution.

ALL the magic happens in the iron core, energy is accelerated with a closed magnetic circuit and then exploded outward when opened. This is also a simple fact that has been written about by Ed L, see his book. 


Bottom line:
A closed magnetic circuit, very little lines of force project outward from the iron.
An open magnetic circuit, lines of force project outward from the iron.

These lines of force MOVE out, from the iron and then MOVE into the iron, HERE is the change in the FLOW of force we need

Quote from Figuera:

"There is production of induced electrical current provided that you change in any way the flow of force through the induced circuit"

That's it, no more complected then what is written above, those are also facts that you will find in any book.


If you manually open a magnetic circuit, work is required.
If you close a magnetic circuit, work is required.

The magnetostriction effect will do the work for you at a very low cost. You only need to provide an initial magnetic field to expand the iron. It will automatically retract when the magnetic field is removed, consequently OPENING the magnetic circuit.

To get a natural force to do WORK for you is an engineers wet dream.

The deal with the shorted coil was taken from one of the patents I cited, may not be necessary.

Important point number 1:
- The shape of the core is insignificant with this concept.

Important point number 2:
- All the action happens with the initial primary coil. Secondary/pickup coil is insignificant.

Fact:
Both points above are stated in the patent's and hold true for this design.

This technique may explain many other FE devices such as the TK device. Nobody has experimented using these simple principles. Everbody wants it to be MORE complicated.

I just want to clear up my point on this concept as it was being presented wrong by others.


Time to build.

Good Luck gentlemen. 

-Core

[hanon]

With the exception of Garry, the underlining principle went right over your head!

Core, I hope you the best with your proposal. I hope really that someone had sucess in this project but I see too many things in your proposal which are not described in the 1902 patent, as the switching sequence on/off alternatively in the inducers and induced coil in your design , and the need for shunting the induced coil or the bias coil. Noone of this is into the patent. Good luck and keep us updated in case of any special result.


In other sense, I tend to think that the key maybe it is some construction features of the system as the one pointed by MagnaProp or any other. Watching closely to the 1902 drawing it is true that it seems to represent that the inducer wires are embedded into a kind of resin/insulation very thick and they are separated from each other a lot. For some reason Figuera showed this detail into the patent drawing ...who knows ... Also the patent states that the distance between both inducers poles must be small...another featured stated in the patent which is quite curious to be addressed explicitly


Regards

[neworld]

Is there a energy researcher - Russian speaker, who is willing to work with me? Does anyone know a Russian speaker would be willing to translate videos into Hebrew or English?