Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 25 Guests are viewing this topic.

digitalindustry

Hanon here is my contribution so far :

feel free to ignore this if it has been covered previously:

see attached.

so it seems to me to try to attempt a 'digital' conversion of this system you would need to:

- generate the correct sine wave.
- Then experiment with break / no break connection also the timing on the brush etc.
- run that Sine pulse to a V wound inductor with the relevant winding but with taps at each stage. (this is the pre inductor/resistor)
- this is not to be underestimated as the taps position on the inductor and the fact that the inductor is wholly connected  and even the Degree at which each inductor meets at the V coudl be important. 
- then those taps go to the electromagnet.
- try a complete isolated Emag or a 'common core' type. 

PS 'R' could also men 'Resonator' but it may likely mean resistor.

when i first saw the picture I first thought it said resonator as it made more sense as an inductive resonator.

marathonman

digitalindustry;

Referring to the comment about the resistor unit. Figueras refers it as a splitter of currant and not an inductor.  spreading out resistive wire in this fashion would have no inductive value at all and would seem that he was trying to get as much wire as he could in a small space while maintaining heat dissipative value.

it has already been shown and says so in the device patent that it can have a common core or separate cores if so desired. the core is not shown in this pic you posted but Buforn shown in all his patents.  i have posted on this subject and made this aware to the forum.

a make before you break set up would give someone the impression that he was trying to avoid inductive collapse in his set up and would be detrimental to this device and destroy the magnetic fields he was trying to build up and maintain in the core. as was passed to me once the field is brought up to a certain level it is easy to maintain it with little amperage.  even though it would create power in the collapse the Amplifying properties of the two primary cores would be destroyed and this is not what we want.

digitalindustry

Quote from: marathonman on December 16, 2015, 08:24:44 AM
digitalindustry;

Referring to the comment about the resistor unit. Figueras refers it as a splitter of currant and not an inductor.  spreading out resistive wire in this fashion would have no inductive value at all and would seem that he was trying to get as much wire as he could in a small space while maintaining heat dissipative value.

it has already been shown and says so in the device patent that it can have a common core or separate cores if so desired. the core is not shown in this pic you posted but Buforn shown in all his patents.  i have posted on this subject and made this aware to the forum.

a make before you break set up would give someone the impression that he was trying to avoid inductive collapse in his set up and would be detrimental to this device and destroy the magnetic fields he was trying to build up and maintain in the core. as was passed to me once the field is brought up to a certain level it is easy to maintain it with little amperage.  even though it would create power in the collapse the Amplifying properties of the two primary cores would be destroyed and this is not what we want.

1. if you don't think that set of coils would have inductance maybe you should familiarize yourself with an induction meter or learn about induction?
also not only would they have induction but it would have variable inductive capacitance.

2. ok i'll ref to the patent it seems to make sense for them to be separate, but ok thank you.

3. that's not what i asked, i asked if it specifically stated 'make before break', because assumption being the mother of all fuck-ups of course.
who says it's 'not what we want' who is 'we' ?
do 'we' have a functioning device? can you link me to the video?


marathonman

maybe you should familiarize yourself with an induction meter or learn about induction.

I have  an Induction meter and am reading more as we speak. i am curious as to what you are attempting to hypothesize in relation to the Figueras device.

Yes there are working Devices but unfortunately they don't wan't to post completely. of the one's i know of they are very cryptic.

ok, take out the word "we" then read it.

all i can say is good luck.

Happy Figuering to all.