Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[NRamaswami]

Hello jegz,

Normally I do not respond to posts [info provided is only F.Y.I., and on occasion is found to be of value]; but, due to a flight delay, I make this rare exception - time permitting.

Briefly, Symmetric Transformers/Systems (normal) can not achieve an efficiency greater than 100% and fall to near 94% (if well designed and constructed) with no load. BEMF will reduce this considerably when loaded.

Asymmetric Transformers/Systems can achieve an efficiency of greater, or less, than 100% - an example is Bi-Filar wound which can significantly reduce BEMF.

Please see this link, in particular post #7, for much greater detail and discussion:

http://zaryad.com/forum/threads/asimmetrichnye-transformatory-v-sverxedinichnyx-sxemax.8970/

The forum is Russian. If you do not read/write Russian you can use "IM Translator" Firefox Add On and get an English translation - the authors there write very well so the translation works quite good; plus the forum is heavily moderated! BTW, IM Translator is free, can translate a full web page, has three translators, provides a technical Russian dictionary, in-line translation, etc. It's excellent, but not perfect yet (Russian language is complex and a bit difficult, but the people are great - and somewhat nice crazy!)...

A broader OU Theory subject link is:
http://zaryad.com/forum/forums/obschie-principy-ustrojstv-alternativnoj-texniki.136/
And again, some excellent discussion and information...

Must run (fly) - have a very good day!
To quote Red Green: "Remember, I'm pulling for ya, we're all in this together."

SL

The information provided by SolarLab is correct to my personal observation. I no longer post as I do not do any experiments now.

A few years back we wound a 18 inch long and 4 inch dia plastic pipe with 12 layers of 4 sq mm wire with each layer having approximately about 83 to 85 turns. This was used as the secondary. On this we wound a quadfilar coil made up of four parallel 4 sq mm wire connected as a 
quadfilar coil. The input was 3300 watts and the output was 3000 watts (300 volts and 10 amps) and was able to power 17 x 200 watts lamps very brightly). The efficiency was 91% on load. Input was 220 volts and 15 amps. That was wound as a symmetrical transformer. The core was iron rods with gaps in between. I have since found insulated iron wires which can be inserted without air gaps and that would increase the efficiency.

I no longer do any research as my foot get swollen due to some unknown problem. But I think the above experiment can be repeated easily with insulated iron wire as the core material without any airgaps to increase the efficiency. I think the efficiency will then increase much higher.

This is still a symmetrical transformer but the primary is a quadfilar coil which provided inductive impedance to 220 volts AC current. It is possible it will reach COP=1 or slightly above 1 even with a symmetrical transformer where the closed magnetic path is avoided.

I have not tested with a closed magnetic path and so I cannot say if it will or will not work. The info provided by Solarlab is correct.

Regards,

Ramaswami

[Cadman]

It's been a long time since I looked at this thread. I'm glad I took another look.

When I originally built this device I did not get good results using NYS coils with PWM, and after studying how DC generators were built over a hundred years ago I came to the conclusion that the difference that made the generators work was flux cutting of a constant strength inducer field. I say constant but I am aware that the strength was increased at times to keep a constant voltage output at increased load.

Now I see that Doug and Marathonman and Hanon have figured out how to achieve that flux cutting and constant strength field so I am going to give this another shot.

Doug and Marathon man, great catch on the mag/amp/variac. You know if you look at the patents the resistance above the commutator is always drawn in a rectangular block. Maybe this was to represent a coil on a iron core tapped at intervals and selected by the commutator brush? Wouldn't that function similar to the variac?

Cadman

[SolarLab]

F.Y.I.

Another explanation/method of Symmetric and Asymmetric (non-symmetric) by Vladimir Utkin (his latest publication?) entitled "OVERCOMING THE LENZ LAW EFFECT:"

http://www.free-energy-info.tuks.nl/Chapter22.pdf

An older Vladimir Utkin Publication [Free Energy: Nikola Tesla Secretes for Everybody," 14th June, 2012:

http://www.free-energy-info.com/VladimirUtkin.pdf

FIN

[marathonman]

Good to see ya Cadman, lone time no hear. i have but one thing to say and that is.

   After three years of constant study, research and on hand experience, i have concluded that the Figuera device operates in said capacity according to the 1908 patent and the following is my interpretation of said free energy device.
in the patents  it can be seen how ingeniously and by mechanical methods, how the engineer tried to generate electrical energy inside a coil by varying the flow of two opposite and opposing magnetic fields, trying to get into the machine the same characteristic behavior of a conventional generator, but without moving parts.

                                               What is the Figuera device

    In a standard generator we have what is termed a quadrature. the incline and decline of the north magnet and the incline and decline of the south magnet.  also we have what is termed "the cogging effect".  the  cogging effect is where the rotor passes the stator electromagnet and opon passing the electromagnet an extreme attraction force wants to pull the rotor back in to register (alignement) causing the motor to bog down from the heavy load of the attractive force. this extreme force from present day generators has been the same since the days of Praxii in France and has not changed. thus we are left with a system that is completely crippled from the cogging effect and inefficient beyond belief. the amount of fuel used in this type of system is staggering and certainly benefits only the Oil Companies and tax hungry Governments.

in the Figuera device both electromagnet accounts for only 1/2 of a quadrature but with no cogging effect what so ever  since the device is stationary and no moving parts.  thus allowing the half quadrature to be much more efficient in terms of  power usage (input)  verses power output. since the cogging effect has been removed the amount of power that was wasted on rotation is now available to the system  for use to power it's electromagnets and rotating brush motor which amounts to very little leaving a system that is so efficient it powers it self and the load indefinitely.  once the system is started with an external power supply, it can be removed and the system remains running with no noise, lubrication,  pollution or waste products to deal with. the implication of such a device is utterly mind boggling and a game changer to the average human.  allowing each and every human to grow their own food 24/7 365 days a year,  pump their own water, power their own home and personal vehicles. thus changing the very Evolution of the human race advancing toward a more productive, peaceful,  harmonistic society riding the powerful elite of their choke hold on the human race through control.
The Figuera device consist of a complimentary set of primary opposing electromagnets (Set N and Set S) between them resides an output coil/core (Y) governed by a controller part "G" that varies the currant allowed through the the primary electromagnets.
the primary electromagnets are varied in currant in unison, one taken high, the other taken low,  just enough to clear the secondary then reversed. in the said action a unique condition takes place in the area the secondary output coil resides in causing a condition known as a Motional Electric Field. as both primaries are occupying the same relative space in space,  we have a set of conditions where both B fields (Magnetic fields) are opposing one another therefore effectively cancelling each other out. in this unique condition,  both fields are effectively equal zero but the electric fields of both electromagnets remain intact therefore doubling the effective E field compared to one electromagnet alone.
by using a DC source through part G,  the original source is effectively split into to two separate feeds allowing the primary electromagnets to be varied separately in unison allowing the cancellation of B fields and the additive E fields to remain to be collected by the secondary, a condition known as a pure BV field. the secondary according to the patent is "properly placed" in this area that is effectively zero B field zone but where the Electric field is actively present and doubled in strength.
Superimposed magnetic flux from the two sets of electromagnets (Set N and Set S)  consists of one electromagnet with left to right spin taken high, and one electromagnet with right to left spin taken low in unison. thus we have a unique condition in the space surrounding  the secondary: the resultant magnetic flux, due to superposition of fields, is zero; and the resultant Motional electric field intensity is E = B1 x V1 + (-B1) x (-V2) = 2B1 x V1, or E2,  double the intensity attributable to one electromagnet alone, where B1 is the magnetic flux due to the electromagnets and V1,  the electron drift velocity in, say, the in and out direction. although the magnetic flux energy in the device is reduced to zero, the electromagnetic induction giving rise to what we term the Motional electric field has by no means been cancelled nor reduced in any way as both are positive and additive .

another unique condition of the opposing primary electromagnets is that while one electromagnet is taken high, the other is taken low but in doing so in it's receding action,  the rising electromagnet basically shoves the receding electromagnet out of the secondary core into it's own core from where it's magnetic field was born.  this action causes a considerable amount of magnetic flux to be confined in the said core  thus allowing the magnetic energy to be shoved out the back of the receding electromagnet into part G to be stored in a magnetic field for later use therefore feeding it's self every half turn of part G. if the receding electromagnet is taken down to far or the primary electromagnets are not in complete unison the pressure between them will cease and induction will fall low to  the output of the peak of the rising electromagnet.

                                                             Part G

after much research into the origin and function of part G,  i was able to narrow, with the help of a colleaque, the origin, device and manufacture of the part G device to Germany and Zeiss or Otto as the manufacturer. both companies produced precision variac of the highest quality and were the go to companies for quality workmanship. more then likely it was Zeiss as the dates and events are to easily lined up.
one little known fact is that DC can be used through a variac and produce similar effects of currant restriction through variation with a twist of a knob. Figuera on the other hand chose to have the core wound with one continuous wind, one end to Set N and the other to Set S  all while varying the currant through the rotating brush making contact with two winding's at a time in a make before break scenario to avoid currant disruption to the primary electromagnets. this action would be detrimental to the function of the device if bemf were allowed to take place as all induction would cease and power production would come to a halt.
part G is a magnetic resistance device rarely used in today's modern world, a forgotten relic in a world of silicon ic's that can be had in any style, shape or form. part G is unique as it splits one DC feed into two separate independent feeds. this feat is accomplished through two opposing fields as the currant enters part G  through it's winding's causing two opposing magnetic fields. these two magnetic fields restrict the amount of saturation of the core restricting currant flow through reluctance (magnetics).
part G is connected to the primary electromagnets to allow the inductive kick back from the receding electromagnet to be stored in it's core every half turn of the rotating brush,  thus allowing the stored magnetic field to be converted into currant feeding the primaries as the brush rotates. this action of part G is similar in action of an inductor allowing energy to be stored  and used,  as the brush rotates so does the magnetic field.

when constructing the device a second secondary can be wound on the output core allowing said secondary to be used for the sole purpose of powering the device to replace losses occurred through heat and wire loss, which accounts for very little aiding the inductive kickback from the declining electromagnet allowing the device to be self sustaining.
once this device is started with an external power supply, the supply can be removed and the device will run indefinitely powering what ever you so choose.

scientist's of our present day say that free energy is "impossible" yet their are over 10,000 free energy device patents in the united states and over 40,000 globally,  most of which were illegally seized by the patent office under the guize "of national security". funny thing is the US patent office is not even part of the US Government ( independently owned and operated)  yet they are continuously allowed to do so,  steeling average citizens free energy patent.  the suppression of free energy is coming to an end as all through out the world are becoming aware  of the ability to self sustain. Maxwell and Faraday proved with out a doubt, that free energy is possible. if this was not so then why did J. P. Morgan, a rich banker, spend million trying to hide the fee energy equations through Heaviside, Lorentz and possibly Einstein through bribe monies. J. P. Morgan even went so far as to pull school books and had them changed and put back into circulation. he was also responsible for the suppression of the most gifted person of our time, yours truly Nicola Tesla. reducing him to the point of feeding pigeons for the remainder of his life.
if perpetual motion is not viable, then apparently our Universe did not get the memo, wouldn't that be awkward if the world stop spinning tomorrow.

[darediamond]

Good to see ya Cadman, lone time no hear. i have but one thing to say and that is.

   After three years of constant study, research and on hand experience, i have concluded that the Figuera device operates in said capacity according to the 1908 patent and the following is my interpretation of said free energy device.
in the patents  it can be seen how ingeniously and by mechanical methods, how the engineer tried to generate electrical energy inside a coil by varying the flow of two opposite and opposing magnetic fields, trying to get into the machine the same characteristic behavior of a conventional generator, but without moving parts.

                                               What is the Figuera device

    In a standard generator we have what is termed a quadrature. the incline and decline of the north magnet and the incline and decline of the south magnet.  also we have what is termed "the cogging effect".  the  cogging effect is where the rotor passes the stator electromagnet and opon passing the electromagnet an extreme attraction force wants to pull the rotor back in to register (alignement) causing the motor to bog down from the heavy load of the attractive force. this extreme force from present day generators has been the same since the days of Praxii in France and has not changed. thus we are left with a system that is completely crippled from the cogging effect and inefficient beyond belief. the amount of fuel used in this type of system is staggering and certainly benefits only the Oil Companies and tax hungry Governments.

in the Figuera device both electromagnet accounts for only 1/2 of a quadrature but with no cogging effect what so ever  since the device is stationary and no moving parts.  thus allowing the half quadrature to be much more efficient in terms of  power usage (input)  verses power output. since the cogging effect has been removed the amount of power that was wasted on rotation is now available to the system  for use to power it's electromagnets and rotating brush motor which amounts to very little leaving a system that is so efficient it powers it self and the load indefinitely.  once the system is started with an external power supply, it can be removed and the system remains running with no noise, lubrication,  pollution or waste products to deal with. the implication of such a device is utterly mind boggling and a game changer to the average human.  allowing each and every human to grow their own food 24/7 365 days a year,  pump their own water, power their own home and personal vehicles. thus changing the very Evolution of the human race advancing toward a more productive, peaceful,  harmonistic society riding the powerful elite of their choke hold on the human race through control.
The Figuera device consist of a complimentary set of primary opposing electromagnets (Set N and Set S) between them resides an output coil/core (Y) governed by a controller part "G" that varies the currant allowed through the the primary electromagnets.
the primary electromagnets are varied in currant in unison, one taken high, the other taken low,  just enough to clear the secondary then reversed. in the said action a unique condition takes place in the area the secondary output coil resides in causing a condition known as a Motional Electric Field. as both primaries are occupying the same relative space in space,  we have a set of conditions where both B fields (Magnetic fields) are opposing one another therefore effectively cancelling each other out. in this unique condition,  both fields are effectively equal zero but the electric fields of both electromagnets remain intact therefore doubling the effective E field compared to one electromagnet alone.
by using a DC source through part G,  the original source is effectively split into to two separate feeds allowing the primary electromagnets to be varied separately in unison allowing the cancellation of B fields and the additive E fields to remain to be collected by the secondary, a condition known as a pure BV field. the secondary according to the patent is "properly placed" in this area that is effectively zero B field zone but where the Electric field is actively present and doubled in strength.
Superimposed magnetic flux from the two sets of electromagnets (Set N and Set S)  consists of one electromagnet with left to right spin taken high, and one electromagnet with right to left spin taken low in unison. thus we have a unique condition in the space surrounding  the secondary: the resultant magnetic flux, due to superposition of fields, is zero; and the resultant Motional electric field intensity is E = B1 x V1 + (-B1) x (-V2) = 2B1 x V1, or E2,  double the intensity attributable to one electromagnet alone, where B1 is the magnetic flux due to the electromagnets and V1,  the electron drift velocity in, say, the in and out direction. although the magnetic flux energy in the device is reduced to zero, the electromagnetic induction giving rise to what we term the Motional electric field has by no means been cancelled nor reduced in any way as both are positive and additive .

another unique condition of the opposing primary electromagnets is that while one electromagnet is taken high, the other is taken low but in doing so in it's receding action,  the rising electromagnet basically shoves the receding electromagnet out of the secondary core into it's own core from where it's magnetic field was born.  this action causes a considerable amount of magnetic flux to be confined in the said core  thus allowing the magnetic energy to be shoved out the back of the receding electromagnet into part G to be stored in a magnetic field for later use therefore feeding it's self every half turn of part G. if the receding electromagnet is taken down to far or the primary electromagnets are not in complete unison the pressure between them will cease and induction will fall low to  the output of the peak of the rising electromagnet.

                                                             Part G

after much research into the origin and function of part G,  i was able to narrow, with the help of a colleaque, the origin, device and manufacture of the part G device to Germany and Zeiss or Otto as the manufacturer. both companies produced precision variac of the highest quality and were the go to companies for quality workmanship. more then likely it was Zeiss as the dates and events are to easily lined up.
one little known fact is that DC can be used through a variac and produce similar effects of currant restriction through variation with a twist of a knob. Figuera on the other hand chose to have the core wound with one continuous wind, one end to Set N and the other to Set S  all while varying the currant through the rotating brush making contact with two winding's at a time in a make before break scenario to avoid currant disruption to the primary electromagnets. this action would be detrimental to the function of the device if bemf were allowed to take place as all induction would cease and power production would come to a halt.
part G is a magnetic resistance device rarely used in today's modern world, a forgotten relic in a world of silicon ic's that can be had in any style, shape or form. part G is unique as it splits one DC feed into two separate independent feeds. this feat is accomplished through two opposing fields as the currant enters part G  through it's winding's causing two opposing magnetic fields. these two magnetic fields restrict the amount of saturation of the core restricting currant flow through reluctance (magnetics).
part G is connected to the primary electromagnets to allow the inductive kick back from the receding electromagnet to be stored in it's core every half turn of the rotating brush,  thus allowing the stored magnetic field to be converted into currant feeding the primaries as the brush rotates. this action of part G is similar in action of an inductor allowing energy to be stored  and used,  as the brush rotates so does the magnetic field.

when constructing the device a second secondary can be wound on the output core allowing said secondary to be used for the sole purpose of powering the device to replace losses occurred through heat and wire loss, which accounts for very little aiding the inductive kickback from the declining electromagnet allowing the device to be self sustaining.
once this device is started with an external power supply, the supply can be removed and the device will run indefinitely powering what ever you so choose.

scientist's of our present day say that free energy is "impossible" yet their are over 10,000 free energy device patents in the united states and over 40,000 globally,  most of which were illegally seized by the patent office under the guize "of national security". funny thing is the US patent office is not even part of the US Government ( independently owned and operated)  yet they are continuously allowed to do so,  steeling average citizens free energy patent.  the suppression of free energy is coming to an end as all through out the world are becoming aware  of the ability to self sustain. Maxwell and Faraday proved with out a doubt, that free energy is possible. if this was not so then why did J. P. Morgan, a rich banker, spend million trying to hide the fee energy equations through Heaviside, Lorentz and possibly Einstein through bribe monies. J. P. Morgan even went so far as to pull school books and had them changed and put back into circulation. he was also responsible for the suppression of the most gifted person of our time, yours truly Nicola Tesla. reducing him to the point of feeding pigeons for the remainder of his life.
if perpetual motion is not viable, then apparently our Universe did not get the memo, wouldn't that be awkward if the world stop spinning tomorrow.

Wao! If it is not Sir Marathonman then it is a counterfeit. Whenever overunity.com comes to my mind, it is you and Ramaswami that ring on my mind. Yes I am an ardent critic of you but I still do respect your views.
Do not get it twisted.....ANY OTHER MARATHONMAN IS A COUNTERFEIT!!
WE have one on here, just one and it is the ORIGINAL!!