Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[a.king21]

a.king21,

It appears some of Figuera's patents work in a similar fashion as the Holcomb devices (LinGen analysis - see the OUR Holcomb thread). Also,
there is some good technical information on the Holcomb web site and HES facebook page.

One of the primary gain mechanisms is found by examining the material B-H Curve. Another is the concept of only moving the Magnetic Field.

Also, in the above post, AC makes the point of increasing the "frequency of operation" - only having to move the magnetic field makes this viable.
Therefore, any small gains can add up quickly. Don Smith used this in his scheme. Combining only these might do it! Some interesting stuff IMHO.

FWIW... Holcomb patent analysis starts about here - a.k.a. "LinGen;" and includes patent review, support material, and animated CAE cartoons:
https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg98509#msg98509


SL

Thanks for that. I was not aware of this patent and it will require some study time.
He essentially repeats Figuera's claim in a different embodiment so it is very interesting.
The billion dollar question is: has anyone purchased a device with this technology in it?
Or..... is this another  Nikola type method of screwing investors according to this article:
https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud

[SolarLab]

Thanks for that. I was not aware of this patent and it will require some study time.
He essentially repeats Figuera's claim in a different embodiment so it is very interesting.
The billion dollar question is: has anyone purchased a device with this technology in it?
Or..... is this another  Nikola type method of screwing investors according to this article:
https://www.npr.org/2022/10/14/1129248846/nikola-founder-electric-trucks-guilty-fraud

Nearly every "disruptive technology" carries the "billion dollar questions - are they real;
can they be viably implemented; will they hit the market in a timely manner, etc.

It's a paradox - the developer needs money to "polish" his invention, this takes time, there can
be hidden problems and obsticles (technical, regulatory, public acceptance, etc.), lots of
Beta and Insitu testing/evaluations, possible modifications, re-tests, and so forth. The risk of
burning a customers factory down or disrupting his production can be catastrophic to any new 
technology - better to take your time and do it right, rather than "rush to market." 

Many investors only see the extremely large ROI available but do not do proper due diligence,
they don't appreciate the "high risk" part of "high reward," nor understand "concept-to-store-shelf"
cycle with all the "I's" dotted and "T's" crossed properly, takes time and a lot of hard work.

Milton is only one of many who got ahead of himself and the investors are only one of many
who didn't understand the arena they were entering and didn't perform any due diligence.

As far as HES (Holcomb) goes - who knows - but I did do some CAE analysis to varify the claims
and a bit of detailed checking so I remain convinced (based on my due diligence) the
technology is viable. It's still a "work-in-progress" however. We'll wait for Dr. Holcomb's lead.

SL

[a.king21]

aking21
Apparent simplicity can be deceiving, did you know wind power follows the cube rule?.

When the wind speed doubles the power available is now 8 times larger ie 2x2x2=8. At first it seemed very non-intuitive to me. Until we understand that twice the mass of air moved through a given plane at twice the velocity. It's not only the velocity but the mass-velocity or total change in momentum which determines the power.

So we need to be careful about looking at things in a superficial sense. What peaked my curiosity is that Figuera often spoke of the total amount of change within the system. Implying that like the power in wind there's more energy available than meets the eye. Something simple already present but so non-intuitive almost everyone overlooked it.

AC

I am only quoting Figuera, who states that this can work with one triple coil system.  ie N.S, and y.  just vary the resistance.
Where Figuera scores is that it appears that he has found a cheap way to convert DC to AC. So any toy motor at 3000 rpm gives you 50hz AC. THAT is a good invention. (However, it does not destroy Lenz.)
Cheap AC is also very mesmerising to those not skilled in the art. ie Bankers.
Funny that he should "die suddenly".

[SolarLab]

F.Y.I.

Modern Inverters are pretty good, and cheap, as well - plus they provide some
great regulation and other features like tracking.

FWIW - Here's a little paper I did on them a while back:

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4154.msg96062#msg96062
SL

[forest]

I think Figuera device produced DC pulsating output.