Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[sparks]

All,


A third meltdown might spell the end of the road for me. I hope we can find a simple system control before it happens. In the meantime, think about this for a moment: what if the output energy comes mostly in the form heat as opposed to the high EM output that we are currently focusing on?

Thanks,

Miki.

   Great Question!

    Please note signature below.

[tishatang]

Miki

At first look, what we might think is a random event is not random after all.  Careful notes when the event occurred can lead us to discover the cause when we get new data.  The runaway might be caused by extra energy in the space vacuum triggering the event if it is on the borderline of occurring.  I am assuming the extra energy is coming from the space  vacuuum.

For example, where your lab is located relative to either the sun or the center of the Milky Way Galaxy.  One would think the energy available would be different in the earth's shadow than directly exposed to the sun or the center of the galaxy? 

Not the focus of this forum, but an example is here:

http://www.gizapyramid.com/Parr/Index2.html

Just a thought,
Tishatang

[sparks]

  @Fenyman

   I think this is what happens if no carbon is used.  The magnetic monopole is so disruptive to human tissue people get broken real fast.  This is the basic design of the tesla howitzer.  But if we aim it at metal I am not sure what is going to happen.

[FatBird]

@ Miki Said:

I have experienced a second meltdown today. This leads me to believe that the first one wasn't an accident or connections error. However,  the reaction only takes place randomly and rarely. When it does, the results are devastating. The output heat and electricity are excessive. I am beginning to suspect we may not be able to control easily this reaction for continuous operation.

==================================================================

There are SO MANY VARIABLES.  Please post a Drawing of your Circuit that did your meltdown, Source Battery Voltage, Pulse Frequency, Graphite Rod Diameter & Length, Toroid Collector number of Turns, etc.

Thank you very much.


.

[allcanadian]

More experiments this morning and things are making much more sense, I reduced the carbon rod to a pellet measuring 2mm x 2mm held between two 2% thorium tungsten rods. I treated the pellet by applying enough current to make the pellet very very hot (smoking hot) hence the need for the tungsten rods. I believe the energy level needed is quite high, in physics it is said that matter will absorb energy to a certain level at which point this matter will radiate energy in excess of which it cannot absorb --- but physics gives no indication as to the time frame in which this happens. If we consider the fundamentals of physics, position, motion and acceleration what may be most relevant would be the extent of the change (acceleration) in a given time frame--- exponential accelerating forces having no constant acceleration. If the time frame from the capacitive discharge is infinately small and the energy level is very high I believe the carbon pellet is forced to "radiate" this applied energy as a field energy versus heat and this may be what I am seeing. The key word here is "radiate" ie.. energy acting outward from the source, I think this energy can take almost any form depending on the time frame and energy level.

@poynt99
I am measuring output with a 20w lightbulb and my oscilloscope is connected across the lightbulb. At this point I am using "relative" measurement, that is comparing the capacitive discharge through  standard induction versus a capacitive discharge through the device. There is a lot of room for error but at this point I am more concerned with the proper proportions and energy levels than output, that is getting the damn thing working properly.