Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

Started by Tesla_2006, July 31, 2006, 08:15:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

Koen1

Quote from: Inventor81 on May 26, 2008, 05:05:15 PM
The basic idea is that at the flux levels required to recoup your input energy, you would kill yourself within 30 minutes.
The basic idea is also that it is an over unity process and that is impossible according to just about any established physicist.
So I am not certain how much you can say with certainty about a pocess that does not follow the assumed standard "rules",
flips energy conservation the bird, and gives us out significantly more than we put in...
;)


QuoteYou WOULD experience physiological effects after a few tens of seconds - and even after a second or two, you would have sunburn-like injuries to the skin exposed to the device.

Thus, it is not the beta which is providing the "overunity".
Or so we hope to be able to assume on the basis of known processes that do not
produce OU. ;)

twosox

@AbbaRue

any joy on locating a suitable circuit diagram ? there is one in the pdf file that Stefan posted from juan, but is
it a 'single shot' or continuous operation circuit? dunno. i'm twiddling my thumbs now waiting for parts.

leo48

@Stefan
QuoteI removed the email addresses from this guy Juan,
cause he was running scams lately...

So I don?t know how valid these informations are.

Regards, Stefan.
How post my MP
tanks you
leo48
Every problem has always at least two solutions simply find
The strength of the strong is the ability to navigate struggles with eye serene

leo48

Hi all
I did a test:

and this is the result:

bar coal is diameter 4 mm and 25 mm long and sending
impulses from 20V.
The upper line is the input
the bottom is the toroid
leo48
Every problem has always at least two solutions simply find
The strength of the strong is the ability to navigate struggles with eye serene

allcanadian

@Xee
QuoteDoes that mean you think the meters are not even any good for detecting low levels of beta rays when they are used in changing strong magnetic fields? It seems that you think there never were any beta rays at all, just false readings due to magnetic fields. Is that a correct reading of what you are saying?
I think the misconception may be the type of fields generated, the beta detector uses ionization to detect radiation so magnetic fields could have little effect on it, but if we are talking about an electrostatic impulse or wave having a high frequency then the detector would see this as radiation as it produces ionization on "any" conductor including the geiger tube.

@inventor81
I think we are on the same page, I have been doing tests with a "copper" conductor/rod as well. It's funny how everything comes back to one person ---- Tesla ;)
Knowledge without Use and Expression is a vain thing, bringing no good to its possessor, or to the race.