Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[mikewatson]

Fraser

The saturable reactor ( 20mmx13mmx5mm) is a ferrite ring with one single toroidal  wound loop so the conductor passes twice through it. It is located 30 cm away from the thorium/carbon contact and the magnetic coil wrapped around the carbon rod. More turns on the ferrite make the wavefrom more ragged and shift the humps around a bit but do not otherwise affect the result.

Mike

[mikewatson]

May I ask one modest question:
Fusion of carbon takes place in high mass stars where core temperatures exceed 600 million degrees K. Carbon may fuse with itself or with other preexisting nuclei in a series of reactions leading to the build-up of heavier and heavier elements ...
How you can do it just using "single circuit"?
with due respect,
khabe

The question is, are there other low temperature mechanisms that can produce results involving nuclear action?  Vall?e evidently thought so. He is not the only one, what about C.L.Kevran's low energy biological transmutations which were published in a book with that title.
You may be sold on the idea that unless it cost a billion dollars nothing can be done in this area, possibly you are right but the only way to found out is to try, otherwise you are defeated at the outset. There is a lot of material around poo-pooed by conventional science suggesting that matter is not as stable as the current physical model would have us believe.

Mike

[Koen1]

May I ask one modest question:
Fusion of carbon takes place in high mass stars where core temperatures exceed 600 million degrees K. Carbon may fuse with itself or with other preexisting nuclei in a series of reactions leading to the build-up of heavier and heavier elements ...
How you can do it just using "single circuit"?

Khabe, we are not talking about fusing two Carbon atoms into one heavier atom.
In this case, or at least if the Vall?e "Protelf" theory is still adhered to which
seems to be the case, we are talking about a different process which the nuclear
physicist dr. Vall?e has dubbed "Protelf" and stands for "Proton-Electron-Fusion".
Roughly speaking, what his theory proposes is that we can "pin down" an atom
using a strong B-field thereby forcing the electron in the atoms orbit to follow
a clear and predetermined path, and then we "blast" the electron with a strong
electric field that is opposed to its direction of motion, which then acts as a sort
of "brake" and slows down the electron. At some point the electron has lost
so much of its momentum that it can no longer remain in orbit and "crashes down"
toward the nucleus. When the electron hits the nucleus, it fuses with the proton,
which temporarily changed both the electron shell and the nuclear attraction of
the atom and effectively turns it into an isotope of a different element. Obviously,
this is not a stable state as the proton and electron haven't really fused properly
and the new isotope is highly unstable, so before long it will decay again,
the electron that wasn't bound tightly to the proton gets "kicked out" of the
nucleus, and the atom returns to "normal" except that it has just emitted an
electron at quite high velocity, and this is beta radiation.
It would seem that we have now "tricked" the atom into emitting beta radiation,
even though the atom was stable and not a decaying beta emitter.

No atoms are fused. Actually, nothing is really permanently fused at all, it seems.
I'd advise to read up on the Protelf theory http://jlnlabs.online.fr/vsg/synergetic.htm

[mikewatson]

Continuing post 817, I have done the test with two (pure) carbon rods alone without any thoriated tungsten. The carbon rods are in light contact. I have got substantially the same hump effect as reported in post 817, so it works with carbon alone.

I repeated the test again with one single continuous rod of carbon and got a smooth waveform from the capacitor discharge without any humps and no sign of the saturable reactor going out of saturation so a single continuous carbon rod does not work, a spark gap is needed, a lightly touching contact being enough. The spark gap no matter how small is needed to generate the reverse current needed to get the humps on the waveform.

Mike

[khabe]

hi Koen1,

Just asked, nothing more. This is absolute not my area - head and shoulders above mine - I know near nothing about and will not press myself in to this topic.
But interesting anyway 
Wish success,
khabe