Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

Started by Tesla_2006, July 31, 2006, 08:15:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

AbbaRue

The following website describes the energy level for the various isotopes.
Anyone wanting to try other materials will find this very useful.

http://www.matpack.de/Info/Nuclear/Nuclids/ 

According to this chart Lithium to Beryllium has the highest decay Energy at 13.606 MeV
and Boron to Carbon has the second highest decay energy at 13.369 MeV. 
I couldn't find anything higher then these two.  No wonder he uses Carbon.

I noticed many have a long Half-Life, does anyone know how this effects the output?
I think the shorter the half-life the more energy output you get.
So 20ms for boron12 to carbon12 would produce a lot of power in a short time.
The Lithium to Berylium half-life of 178.3ms is also very short but longer then the other.

I don't understand these concepts well enough to determine anything.
Maybe someone else has an idea and can enlighten us on it.
What element would produce the most energy output of all and what would be 2nd in place?


Koen1

Quote from: AbbaRue on May 08, 2008, 02:24:10 AM
The following website describes the energy level for the various isotopes.
Anyone wanting to try other materials will find this very useful.

http://www.matpack.de/Info/Nuclear/Nuclids/ 
I don't see any usefull decay info when I click that link... ?

But I think you should keep in mind that what we're looking at here is not
natural but rather stimulated decay of isotopes that are also
artificially created and not stable... Or at least, if the Vall?e theory holds.
The idea is that we "kick" an orbiting electron into the nucleus where
it fuses with a proton into a neutron but that's not a stable situation,
so the electron gets "spat out" again...
So the isotope that decays isn't really an isotope of that element; the
Boron atom isn't really a Boron atom, it is really still a Carbon atom
with a messed up nucleus. That's sort of the idea, as I understand it. ;)

starcruiser

Quote from: UncleFester on May 08, 2008, 01:06:05 AM
I did not detect any appreciable amount of gamma or alpha radiation. My meter reads all three and logs to a program on my laptop. Beta does get a bit high if you really kick up the B-field and input capacitance. But still less than I would have thought.

Tad

From what I read Beta is what we are after isn't it? the trick is to direct the beta particles into a circle/vortex to affect the torrid coil(s) and produce usable voltage/current. I think we need a slightly stronger mag field than the earth in order to redirect those pesky Beta particles to do our bidding.
Regards,

Carl

AbbaRue

Has anyone had contact with J. Naudin recently?
It would be interesting if he would join us on this thread for some input.

I kind of wonder why he didn't pursue this device further?
By now he might have had a working power source.

Feynman

Hey;  no I haven't spoke with Naudin...

I think part of his problem was 35V with 80,000uF.  I think the success would be much more obvious with 2-3kV and 10uF. ;) Incidently, those toroids look excellent.  Wonder what the advantages/disadvantages of silicon-steel core...