Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[Feynman]

There is a capacitor in series after the AC output .  The cap is charging up and discharging at around 35khz, which is the frequency of the inverter.  You need the cap in order to get enough current to get some amps through the carbon, especially running the inverter off a small battery. 

So yes alecks, in a sense it is sort of AC 'pulsed'  going into the carbon because the cap is charging and discharging at 35khz (same freq as inverter). However, there is no deliberate PWM in the existing setup.  We are currently adding PWM capability at higher discharge amperages, hopefully so we get higher amps on the output as well as the ability to safely self-run.  Also remember pulsed DC into the carbon works too. We will have full schematics soon. 

@stefan
That picture looks accurate to my understanding.  I will verify the details as soon as I can. 

[Earl]

@F

There are extreme inconsistences about the magnets being on the side of the carbon rod.

The mp3 interview CLEARLY indicates that the magnetic field and the electric field are in the same direction.  All the information on the JLN site and explanation drawings indicate that both fields are in the same direction and that they MUST be in the same direction.

Therefore if something is observed with the magnets on the side of the carbon rod, it can have no connection to the Vall?e Synergetic Generator.

These inconsistences should be cleared up post haste.

Earl

[Feynman]

@Earl

Relax buddy!  I did the goddamn interview.  We are operating without pictures here so there are bound to be errors in communication. We are doing the best we can. The details will be verified as quickly as possible.  All of us have jobs, we live around the planet, and we cannot see exactly what other people's have in their head or on their lab bench.

The latest picture from Stefan is the most accurate description we have so far.  Yes it is not exactly consistent with the E-field and B-field bias described by Synergetic theory and Naudin, but the experiments have already proven some aspects of that whole thing incorrect (you dont need thoriated tungsten or a spark gap, etc) .    What matters is the presence of a strong B-field. It can be whatever which way and you will get the effect of beta emission as long as it is present.

[hartiberlin]

Or this version then could also work...

[Feynman]

@Stefan

Theoretically, that latest drawing could work I think.  But we tried it with an aluminum can and we did not have success.  But we only tried once late at night when everyone was tired.

The successful runs have been with a wound toroid as a collector surrounding the carbon rod and the biasing permanent magnet against the rod, similar to what you did in the second to last drawing. Again, you will get lots and lots of beta.  If you are experimenting with this, that's how you know its working (the presence of beta way above background levels).