Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[waterfireho]

. . .

[sparks]

good joke. Well, I'm still struggling with RF, and the fact that vacuum has frequency-dependent properties.

  Hmmmm  I see your problem.  Maybe the vacuum aint empty which pretty much means it doesn't exist.  hmmmmmmmmm   Shit I just saw a whole pile of confusion called particle physics and quantom physics disappear into a magnetic monopole.

[Koen1]

hence my octarine photon remark.

Aleks, it is not that I do not appreciate your interpretation,
but you do understand that if you toss half of established em theory
out the window and start talking about magnetic monopoles,
even though in a certain interpretation that may be usefull,
it does not really accord with the theory of em as most of us
in this thread understand it, and that is also why I asked you
to explain.
Now I see what your angle is, I can understand your remarks on
the monopole.

And by the way, Terry Pratchett is an author of humoristic/absurdistic
fantasy novels. Has zero to do with physics, and a lot with whiticisms.
The octarine remark was a joke. Or intended to be something like it anyway.

[Feynman]

All this has gotten a bit silly.   We have some promising leads.  So let's investigate them via experiment.   Agreed, it is really that simple.   If we get it, we get it.    If we don't, we try another way.

This is not a weekend hobby.  This is about the destiny of mankind and the future of the world.

@R
You have posted what your friend, obviously a very intelligent guy, thought from his education and his work at a PUBLIC accelerator lab.  For this to be seriously theoretically useful, we would need a physicist from one of the trillion-dollar 'black' projects, not a public university program.

Yes the screeching meter is probably EMI.  There is probably some surplus beta as well.  Maybe these betas are low energy particles, just alot of them. The fact that Fester has no radiation burns simply tells us the process is relatively safe (low ionizing radiation at 1meter+).  It does not disprove OU. As I wrote yesterday, and posted in an excellent post by callanhan (But somehow flew right over everyones heads), most of the beta energy is NOT converted to radiation or heat. Much of it turns to power flux within the rod.

This was the whole point of JLN's experiments, where we see a large increase in power flux in the presence of a biasing magnetic field.  JLN's research is where this started, not Fester's 1seivert measurement.  The ridiculous EMI reading from a little emf-spewing neon is really just a comical distraction.

I think everyone here needs to go back and re-read Callanhan's post. By connecting the biasing EMF field in SERIES with the carbon rod, along with a high ampere feedback diode, with the biasing EMF thick-gauge windings anti-parallel to the toroid windings on the inside of the toroid, you can further increase the power flux.  (I realize this is confusing, I will work with groundloop to draw and post a picture). I think this is absolutely brilliant, and if it works, it will be useful regardless of how this mechanism occurs (beta or no beta, who cares).   What we want is power flux, this is even better than beta because it will be to run the device safely.

Callanhan's specific detail will vastly increase our collected power if it works.  Over the short EMF burst in the rod, the magnetic field generated by the carbon (via increasing power flux) will produce more magnetic flux (aligned with both toroid and system dipoles) creating a positive feedback loop.  As the power flux increases, the 'alignment' magnetic flux will increase, thus (as Koen said) increase the number of 'hits' we get. But all this is really academic. I appreciate you posting the thoughts of the Ph.D. physicist, but a friend wrote to me in an email, they do not teach about UFOs in astronomy class. Nor do they teach about free energy in physics class.   What we need is experiments, as Tesla spent his entire life conducting.

The way forward is to do some experiments (at the proper energies, 110Joules for a 6mm x 60mm carbon rod, minimum 37Volts!!!) so we quit spinning our wheels. 

[aleks]

Now I see what your angle is, I can understand your remarks on the monopole.

Copper's electron-electron pairs is a fact. Well, quantumists tell such pairs exist because of phonon exchange - even though it should be non-symmetric since electrostatic field is repulsive. How's that? However, if you look at it via electrostatic field understanding, it's pretty weird and in fact proves my understanding that contact of two electrostatic fields produces third field that may bind them together - and of course it will affect surrounding particles and charges as well.

OK, it's all interpretations, but I think mine fits well this overunity topic. What they can predict? I've named a couple of things already: you need planar-powdered structures for best performance, and you need unit discharges - capacitor is best since it discharges as fast as physical world can be. The created mag.field is perpendicular to carbon rod, and pretty much replicates normal mag.field produced by current along a conductor. But it is more powerful than what calculations will show for a given impulse power in Joules.