9/11 truth movement topic

[FreeEnergy]

http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=-2899586663939158659

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7218920724339766288&sourceid=top100newfeed

[hartiberlin]

Wow, that is the best documentation I have ever seen about the 9/11 untruth...

This evidence is the best I have seen so far !
the Twin towers were destroyed probably by bomb explosions and
the Pentagon was probably hit by a cruise missile, not a plane !

I also always wondered back at this date myself, how the side
buildings of the Twin towers Center 7 or how it was called , did crash ?
When they showed this that day on TV it looked exactly
as if it was demolitioned with explosives and not from
the debris of the twin towers !

Watch this, it will open your eyes...
get as soon as you can before Google will take it off.
Download the GVI files, convert it to DVD and donate it to all your friends !

[btester1]

Guess that's why he postponed the 2008 Election.

Beginnings of a dictatorship after 9/11.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20060731/cm_thenation/20060814gillers

[hartiberlin]

From:
http://0911.site.voila.fr/

Saturday, July 08, 2006
Pentagon eyewitness IDs Global Hawk

Audio report from Republic Broadcasting Network.
http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Piper/0607/20060707_Fri_Piper.mp3
Summaries via LibertyForum July 7, 2006


"Christopher Bollyn, American Free Press, reports:

Samuel Danner (electrical engineer for AmTrak),
was involved in the clean-up at the Pentagon crash site
and inspected the debris at the site.

He said, "It was not a Boeing 757 that hit the Pentagon.

The plane looked like a hump-back whale."
He thinks a Global Hawk hit the Pentagon.
(There were only seven made as of 9/11/01
and two were missing at the time.)

Danner is a former pilot.
He said the aircraft that hit the Pentagon was very quiet
with one engine near the back.
He also saw a second plane overhead
and wonders if it was controlling the plane that hit the Pentagon.

He walked the lawn and picked up small pieces of debris with others.
He did not see any bodies from the aircraft.

Danner is very ill now with lymphoma,
which may be the result of DU exposure at the Pentagon on 9/11.

He wants to talk now (after seeing "Loose Change")
because "it's been bugging me."

The Global Hawk fired a DU missile that penetrated the thick concrete
wall of the Pentagon.
DU was detected at the time and workers on the scene later in the day
wore protective equipment.


-----------------------

Yep, this 53-yr old Sam Danner, a pilot since the age of 16,
was a first-hand observer of the crash.
He pulled his car over to the south of the pentagon
on the right side of 395 when he saw the approach of the plane
that hit the pentagon.

He also observed a bunch of guys outside the pentagon
standing there looking through binoculars.

He got a good view of the plane's approach,
for a duration of at least three seconds.
He says that the plane was not a 757, no way.

"It was like a humpback whale" he says. . . .
one engine on the backside with a "V" tail and no windows
he could see. And it was very quiet.

Going about 400mph. Overhead, at an estimated 15,000 feet
he saw another plane.

As an EMT, he ran over to help at the pentagon,
but found no bodies,
no wreckage from a boeing aircraft on the scene.
He smelled cordite and he saw a 3-foot single engine
on the ground there.

He picked up graphite pieces similar to the composite wings
on a global hawk.

This engine matches the description of the single engine of a globalhawk.
The globalhawk is a UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle)
but could not have caused the damage if it wasn't containing
a bunker-busting missle deployed on impact.

The plane observed overhead might have been the plane controlling
the remotely-controlled mission.

If a 757 had crashed into the pentagon,
then there would have been aluminum all over the grass
and two 9-foot diameter engines.

http://www.total911.info/2006/07/pentagon-eyewitness-ids-global-hawk.html





Tuesday, September 11, 2001; 4:59 PM


Steve Patterson, 43, said he was watching television reports of the World Trade Center being hit
when he saw a silver commuter jet fly past the window of his 14th-floor apartment in Pentagon City.

The plane was about 150 yards away,
approaching from the west about 20 feet off the ground, Patterson said.
He said the plane, which sounded like the high-pitched squeal of a fighter jet,
flew over Arlington cemetary so low that he thought it was going to land on I-395.

It was flying so fast that he couldn't read any writing on the side.
The plane, which appeared to hold about eight to 12 people,
headed straight for the Pentagon but was flying
as if coming in for a landing on a nonexistent runway, Patterson said.

"At first I thought 'God, there's a plane truly misrouted from National,'"
"Then this thing just became part of the Pentagon ...
I was watching the World Trade Center go and then this. What's next?"

He said the plane, which approached the Pentagon below treetop level,
seemed to be flying normally for a plane coming in for a landing
other than going very fast for being so low.

Then, he said, he saw the Pentagon "envelope" the plane
and bright orange flames shoot out the back of the building.

By Barbara Vobejda
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 11, 2001; 4:59 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/daily/sep01/attack.html



Don Perkal   
Even before stepping outside I could smell the cordite.
Then I knew explosives had been set off somewhere.
http://www.mcsweeneys.net/2001/09/19perkal.html



Gilah Goldsmith 
We saw a huge black cloud of smoke, she said,
saying it smelled like cordite, or gun smoke.
www.guardian.co.uk/wtccrash/story/0,1300,550486,00.html



Asked if there were unreleased photographs of the attack that would convince the doubters,
Zelikow, of the 9/11 commission, said, "No."
(of course, because they can't...)

"The question of whether American 77 hit the Pentagon is indisputable," Zelikow said.
(really? lol...)
"One reason you tend to doubt conspiracy theories when you've worked in government
is because you know government is not nearly competent enough to carry off elaborate theories.
It's a banal explanation, but imagine how efficient it would need to be."
(conspiracy theories, moronic automatic phrase association, blabla virtualising facts with words...
nuts equation: conspiracy + theories -> conspiracies are theories

sliding about possibility & fact that when it's not a theory... it's indeed a conspiracy. )
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A13059-2004Oct6?language=printer



at least... the "independant" "commission" didn't see any of the other pentagon videos & documents,
showing the 757 in question...
this kind of "commission" can't be serious...

check the "vigilant guardian" (the worse named) operation...
a part of the whole thing.

[hartiberlin]

This is really the biggest scam and cover up I have seen during the last years.
Go to:
http://question911.com/linksall.htm

and download all the videos and get the word out to all your friends !