9/11 truth movement topic

[Dingus Mungus]

@ Ring Theory

I know you understand the physics principles involved in fall times.
Research the building fall times, refrenced against local seismological
data then get back to us on "theories" about explosives being used.

Forget all the other useless conjecture...
Just justify the fall times and precollapse seismological spikes.

Here I'll make your job easy to ensure you at least look before responding.
http://www.911review.com/errors/wtc/seismic.html
http://physics911.net/closerlook
http://www.drjudywood.co.uk/articles/BBE/BilliardBalls.html

WTC7 is my favorite example as it only contained diesel fuel, no jet fuel.
If you reply without adressing fall time you only acknowledge its validity.

~Dingus Mungus

[CB_Brooklyn]

My first post!


The Twin Towers did not "collapse", they were pulverized:

http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=57

[ring_theory]

@CB_Brooklyn
Your right and wrong. Wrong that they did not collapse, and right that they were pulverized.
Hunting for debris in a sea of debris? You yourself said they was pulverized. the so called missing debris was carried with the wind and coated the ground 4-6 inches of it. I looked at the images of your post and can answer all the questions posed.

@dingus

The difference between a vacuum and oxygenated atmosephere are many. Friction and the heat generated from it can count for the .5 difference.
still I see no evidence of explosives bieng used. The floors did NOT pancake the debris following the path of least resistance more than likely blew holes in the floors below puncturing them at there weakest spots probably 4-5 stories preceding the main flow of debris. which followed pulverizing and creating huge amounts of heat generated by the debris. to expect buildings such as tower #1 and #2 to fall symetricly floor by floor is proposterous. It was MEYHEM that nothing could survive in the direct path and the heat that was generated was extreme

[CB_Brooklyn]

well, I guess it depends on the usage of the term "collapse". I agree with you on the lack of evidence for explosives. I believe the explosives "evidence" is propaganda to distract people from the directed energy weapon evidence.

The Director of Public Affairs at the Directed Energy Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory says Dr Judy Wood's WTC directed energy weapon research is "interesting and worthy of further consideration"!!

See the FAX sheet here:
http://drjudywood.com/home/Garcia4.jpg

[nutekk]

i find the account of Barry Jennings (deputy director of the nyc housing authority , emergency management division) to raise many questions.

he was inside WTC7 before either of the towers fell and he said bombs were going off inside. "the lobby was destroyed ,it looked like king kong had come through and stepped on it"
he knew what he heard and he heard explosions.
and all this was before the towers had fallen.

There are many, many quetions.