TK device, TPU.. Only enter if you seek truth. Cause here it is...

[tinu]

Merry Christmas everyone!
Time out for me until 2013 so I wish you Happy New Year!

[elementSix]

Merry Christmas to all researchers and hopes for a great 2013,  Great hopes have been given over the last few weeks.  The realstrannik Russian forum has 2 very hopeful devices which of one has been replicated.  So lets all focus on the RED device and The MUSTAFA device.  The Mustafa device has a 200w input with 2.5Kw output.  Both devices use pulsed tech and the RED device uses Ferrit rings that are inside a large coil.  I think at least the RED device is an NMR type using ferromagnets as the sample target.  So check these out.  The creators aren't very forthcoming with the type of diodes and Thyristors used but there is enough info to  do your own device.  Do not ignore this, it is what we are needing and it has to be made and put into friends and family's homes.  They should sign a non-disclosure agreement and not talk about it, just to keep it secret until there are hundreds of them in your home towns.  Remember to only put them into homes where the people don't work with or have family that work for the Energy company's.  I know I am getting way ahead of myself but this is the only way to get it out there.  Just food for thought.  Merry Christmas and hope that Santa and God bring us this great device..

[elementSix]

showing my ignorance....
my take is when you find your source that allows constant spin on the elements in an atom, you'll find the source.
the limited analogy that i have is if a spinning top were to have a spin like the proton, then approach the spinning top's surface glently and give the spinning top's spinning surface a slight tap, it will precess. tap it slightly at the right time intervals like pushing a swing set will cause the spinning top to precess longer.
i think it depends on if the protons/neutrons influence the electron orbit. if it does i'm 'one track minding it' to flux cutting.
here is a snip from one of bearden's shows where he talks about floyd sweet's vta device. 'bearden's take on the floyd sweet device'. the parts that i understand are what i think would be the safest approach to a solution.
i'm interested in thoughts on this.
thanks.

nap

Nice explanation.  Thats what we need,  to keep the top spinning.  Thats what the 2 RF frequency's are for.  When we spin the Nucli from the low energy state to the high energy state, it becomes saturated and requires a different frequency to move it again.  Some spin from the higher energy state to the lower energy state.  It depends on the material.  But the different energy state nucli amounts are very close.  The lower energy state Nucli are a little more populous in the material than the higher energy state Nucli.  CW is the old form of NMR, which isn't nearly as powerful as the pulsed systems.  Does anyone think that using a wide band of RF signals at once can work as good as using just certain RF pulses that are the resonant frequency's?  Probably not.
Thanks for that clip slappy.  Have you looked at the RED and Mustafa Schematics?? I have problems using the Russian realstrannik forum with google translate.  I am going to PM the russian guy on the 5KW TK forum to help us figure out the Thyristors and diodes used in them.  Heres the Mustafa circuit.  Plus theres another from Russia that I'm not sure whats going on because its in Russian.

[verpies]

the RED device uses Ferrit rings that are inside a large coil.  I think at least the RED device is an NMR type using ferromagnets as the sample target.

Interesting.
What else is known about the RED device from the russian forums?
Any waveform data? Any coil construction details?  Any core details?

The thyristors are low performance devices by today's standards - Latching and inferior power handling compared to IGBTs and much slower than MOSFETs.  Using thyristors should not be much of an obstacle.

Merry Christmas to you, too.

[yfree]

Have you looked at the RED and Mustafa Schematics??

Yes, RED and Mustafa schematics have a chance of working.
Mustafa seems to be closer. At least, in Mustafa schematic, it should be possible to efficiently transfer power from P1 to P2 (see below). It does not mean though that any two transformers connected through a 60 uF capacitor will transfer power efficiently from P1 to P2.
To accomplish this, the circuit (L2+L3)C1 has to resonate at 50 or 60 Hz (depending on the grid frequency). This means that C1 has to be adjusted (tuned). Induced  resonant oscillations in this circuit are biasing the core of the transformer T2.
However, there is more to this schematic than initially meets the eye.
Transformer T2, depending on it's shape and core cross-section, is just another possible implementation of the arrangement from Michel Meyer patent CZ 284,333. In here,  L3 provides magnetic biasing and magnetic modulation and L4 serves as a pick-up coil and supplies RF excitation, when pulsed either by a spark-gap or a thyristor. The detailed working principle of this kind of an arrangement has already been described by McFreey.
Induced transmutation of the core material in transformer T2 may provide additional energy. It does not mean though that any two transformers will do the trick.
The circuit, depending on implementation, has a working potential.