Hutchison GoFundMe Scam ?

[hartiberlin]

P.S: Also I don´t know or understand how Hutchison wants to remove or
wants to fight the radioactive contamination from Fukushima
just via some weird sound waves ?


Seems to me, that he belittled the radioactive contamination more this way...

[gauschor]

It would make sense perhaps if you see it from the point of view that everything is waves and one could eliminate contamination by using a kind of waves which equalize or reduce the radioactive ones (the gamma rays?). I personally don't think he is a scammer, but agree that he's kind of a mad scientist.
It is though believable that one could levitate objects by sound, but from what I've seen he needs a lot of energy. If you look for antigravity then Townsend Brown is a better to start. Regarding his crystal cells, I'm also not convinced as it could only light a small LED (a crystal cell which is about 50 times the size of battery). And the video he posted unfortunately shows nothing concrete.

[hartiberlin]

Hutchison posted a new video here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIUMbKUe7aM
I think it is a total fake. There must be a hidden power source.
These 2 cylinders can never deliver this shown about at least 1 Watts constant  output power !
(2 Motors and incandescent lamp )
He showed in his first videos, that one cylinder just blinks a small Neon bulb maybe every 10 or 20 seconds.
This shows, that it is just a miniscule High Voltage pulse with very low energy in it only...
Now claiming these LC networks will equalize the power is just a scam.

They have also losses and will even reduce the output power..
Hutchison seems to do this  only for the money.


Did you see, when he adjusted the coils, nothing changed !
So he probably has a hidden battery somewhere beneath his LC circuit board...


If it would be real, he would show scopeshots and better measurements with current and
voltage readings...


Too bad that Hutchison has gone this way now to scam people for their money...
I liked his former Antigravity research, but I wonder, why he does this now...
Please post your views.
Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

[MileHigh]

That Hutchison clip is a totally dishonest nonsense clip.  That's usual for him.   Remember he went to clean up the big BP oil spill with crystal harmonic waves or something like that.

To paraphrase Frank Zappa, "Kiss my Aura, Johnny."

Hutchison has a big rebuttal and I bet you it is for this thread:

AS EXPECTED I GOT A NASTY COMMENT FROM ONE OF THE FREE ENERGY GROUPS TOTAL FAKE BUT TO BE EXPECTED AS THIS CUTS INTO THERE MONEY FEEDING FUNDING STUFF I GUESS HA HA I DELETE AND BLOCK USERS WHO NEEDS NEGATIVITY AND EGO STUFF

Delete and block your way through life John.  Ignorance is intelligence.

John makes me think of the people that you might see leaving a pharmacy...... "Spare change?...  Spare change?"

[flathunter]

I, too, have some suspicions about John. Its a shame, cos I always loved his videos of the flying canon ball and stuff. But he could always make me change my mind in the future, by coming out with something legit and replicable. I like to remain uncommitted with regards to who's a scammer, who's delusional, and who's working for the man.

I replicated his crystal battery after I saw him dressed as a blonde and claiming that a few simple domestic salts would sort you out some constant energy which didn't come from galvanic action. I tried it, and got a simple and pretty cool galvanic battery that needed water, or went flat. Interesting and fun, but not what he claimed it to be. I tried lots of different types, including ones with ground up BaTiO3 in the mixture. I managed to get a CFL to light from this battery (after a robust charge up), but again it went flat under load, and needed water to kick it back into life. The people who I really trust on youtube don't seem to get the same results as the free energy 'big names' (Hutchinson and Bedini) in these experiments. Neither do I. Perhaps we are doing it wrong, but I am not so sure these days.

Life is a learning process I suppose. I haven't given up on free energy, but I am certainly a lot more sceptical over new (or old) claims.