Free Solid State/mechanical energy

[Charlie_V]

Erfinder,

That's very interesting to think about.  I have noticed that there is a very special point when you bring two magnets together, whether they are attracting or repelling, there is a "neutral" point.  This neutral point is not in modern science.  Science would say that the field between two magnets, in attraction, is uniform.  However, there is a definite spot of neutrality - as you say the point where the fields enter the void and come out again.  I have also seen the neutral spot in electric fields between two plates.  Like you said, there is a void in a battery (or capacitor), is this the "neutral spot" you were talking about?

In your circuit experiment, I guess my main question is what added benefit does having the magnetic ring give?  It adds four neutral spots; do these increase performance, motor rotation, etc.?  To me (and this is probably a bad character flaw of mine) if something has no effect on operation, then it is probably better (i.e. cheaper) to leave it out. 

Many thanks for your continued help/guidance!

[bocas]

Grumpy & Erfinder,
   Thank you for all of the references.  I also found this 3 hour video of Dale Ponds talking to a group about Keely.  Really interesting.  Thanks again....Jeff

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9125003792513982191

[pese]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5430570751600484561
2, part of video

pese

[barbosi]

Erfinder,

Reading I clarified a lot of things. I still have questions and probably many of them will have an answer later in learning process.

I would like to ask you though:
When you say there are two circuits (1 primary and two secondaries each) in parallel, that means the connection is a "node" (in sense of wave not electric)?

Second. numer 3 seams to have a great significance (not only 2 as opposed energies), it appears to be the important neutral. How is this related to VOID? Is this the VOID? If the answer is somehow complex, could you please point to a certain reference reading material? I feel this is important because in vedic mathematics there are 3 circles with 360 degrees and lenght 360 each witch will give 1080 the famous number. also the way the Octave is defined is in relation of 3 (=frecquency+2*frecquency ?) Just playing with numbers....

There are many other questions, but I think is enough for now.
Or are we failing to ask other questions at this time? What would you state so we would burst the right question?

@All,
Thank you for the reference material. Lately I was busy dissecting the information. While the progress is quite small if measured in number of pages, the content is briliant and realy enjoyable. I made few others to start reading it and they all are impressed. Don't know about copyrights and other nonsense like that, but if possible, I would file them in "Download" area with a brief description. This way information will not be scatered and a curious mind would find easy what he needs.

As for me, I'm sure this is the start of an enjoyable jorney.

Thanks.

[barbosi]

Since we have learn about vedic science, I found on  http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread120045/pg1 some info about Vedic Physiscs.
All credits go to "Indigo_Child" I just put his post into a pdf file.

Related to the current thread or not, judge for yourselves.