Free Solid State/mechanical energy

[Maximumgravity1]

One point I should clarify, as it was late last night, and I believe the brain was getting in the way of the gut....

Anyway, the denominators on Ed's Sweet Sixteen are doubled not squared.  Regardless of what the sweet sixteen is exactly, it seems apparent to me that it is a "scale".  It works nicely both geometrically and mathematically.  By dividing each harmonic by 1/2, it seems apparent that these numbers form a very familiar sequence:
1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, 1/64, 1/128, 1/256, 1/512, 1/1024, 1/2048, 1/4096, 1/8192, 1/16384, 1/32768

This is all 16 numbers.  From 128 on up, the geeks among us will begin to recognize these as divisions for RAM.   From 1024 up, these are the "true" numbers corresponding to megabytes 1mb=1024kb, 2mb=2048kb, etc.  This works nicely with computers, and I see a correlation.  In short, this is the binary 1, 0 state that a memory register can be - either true or false - charged, or not charged.  They are all factors of 1+1=2.  It flows up the scale that 2+2=4, 4+4=8, 8+8=16, etc...  The reason I see a correlation is that we have two poles - two charges - to magnets at work.  1pole + 1pole = 2 poles.  We have two streams at work, and this is the culmination of the factors of those streams.

This may just be coincidence, but I believe there is a correlation, if we take the 185,000 from Tesla (the speed of flow in a circuit), and divide it by the 13th iteration (1/8192) - we get 185000/8192 = 22.5830078125.  This isn't exact, but mighty close to our 22.5 that keeps tying our harmonic levels together as well as our arc segment angle.

Anyway, that might make my "feelings" a little more understandable.  I still don't see how it all connects together to make something useful, but I feel it is on the right track to understanding.

***EDIT: one thought that occured to me why we square the number of magnets is it is a litteral "squaring of the circle" - at least a squaring of the magnets that make up the circle...

[louis]

check out what bruce has to say about harmonics

http://www.scribd.com/doc/6636/Cathie-Bruce-Harmonic-695

he's on the same wavelength.

[nat1971a]

Hi All,

I've just noticed something bizarre in the following pictures. The formation of the maps represent the shape of ed's generator. There appears to be a relationship of some sort. And somehow I get the feeling it also relates to waters drawing of the 4 squares too.

N.

[nat1971a]

in the second map drawing one wouldnt notice it unless looking hard for it. quite odd really

[nat1971a]

Hi All,

Heres my thoughts on the numbers:-

John Harrison (1693-1776)
said " the natural scale of music is associated with the ratio of the diameter of a circle to its circumference i.e pi          3.14.....

"If you consider a complete circle to be one octave"........

....."twelve equal semitons make one octave"

So does this mean that 12 semitons or segments or magnets (arranged in a circle) is an octave.........


http://www.lucytune.com/new_to_lt/pitch_01.html

Regards,

N.