Free Solid State/mechanical energy

[barbosi]

...
The 144 inches is based on a 22.5mm inch.
...

www.themeasuringsystemofthegods.com/index.html

Quote taken from the site:

"The Three Metrics that are most common to Free Energy Devices are
1080/45 = 24 mm inch and the 1080/48=22.5 mm inch and the 1080/42 Metric.
The 25.4 mm Inch has NO scientific value as you are led to believe, it is only to deceive you."
...

Any hint why is used 22.5 inch mm and not 24 mm inch? Or may be used also 24 mm inch as well? What might be the noticeable difference?
Sorry I'm trying to grasp the concept...

Best regards.

[Charlie_V]

HAHA I know how this works, or atleast what he's trying to do.  I have a similar idea which I attempted but, for lack of equipment, vaulted for a later time.  Here is my explanation of what is happening. 

There are two forms of power, real power (which we use to light our houses) and reactive power.  There are many fancy equations to explain reactive power, but the concept is simple: the voltage and current rise and fall at different times.  In order to have real power, your voltage and current must rise to a maximum and fall to a minimum at the same time, in sync with each other.  If the voltage starts to rise faster or slower than your current, reactive power is generated.  The maximum reactive power you can have is when your voltage reaches a max at the exact same time your current reaches zero.  In essence, your voltage is 90 degrees out of phase with your current. 

How does this apply to over unity?  In order to drive any kind of motor, you must have a coil with an oscillating magnetic field pushing and/or pulling against another magnetic field (the other field being a permanent magnet, energized coil, or eddy current).  It is well known that the larger the current flowing in a coil, the greater the magnetic field produced. 

With real power, you are limited in the amount of current you can generate.  Transformations are possible, however the load required to produce a large current would need to be very big (i.e. small resistance).  In a large coil, small resistance can be hard to achieve.  This is where reactive power becomes much more interesting. 

A standing wave can be produced in a single wire without a closed loop (i.e. ground connection).  The very essence of a standing wave is reactive.  Real power placed in the system is reflected back.  The reflecting waves interfere with the outgoing waves and produce nodes and antinodes.  At each voltage node, there is a current maxima.  At each voltage antinode, the current is zero.  Since power in an electrical circuit is P=V*I, a voltage of zero could yield a current of infinity.  Thus, in a standing wave, the current maximum at each antinode can be extremely high. 

By properly arranging your secondary coils to coincide with a current antinode, you could produce an extremely large magnetic field with only the loss of wire resistance.  Place a magnet on an axial near this coil and you will cause the axial to spin.  The interesting thing is that no real power is being used....  This is a reactively driven motor.  Erfinder's circuit seems to be along these lines - a concept that reeks of over unity!

Whats even more interesting is that you don't need any special design.  ANY electrical motor could be operated reactively - in theory anyway.  The problem is going to be using low frequency oscillations to drive the motors, which will require very very very long lengths of wire.  This doesn't mean the device needs to be large, you can make the self inductance/capacitance big enough so that the wave velocity (speed at which the waves travel) is much slower than the speed of light.  That would make your wire lengths smaller - but not by much. 

If you want to use higher frequencies, bear in mind that a motor has a certain time constant.  You can only switch the magnetic fields so fast before the motor starts to rotate slower and ultimately stops. 

Hope this helped,
Charlie

[Charlie_V]

So, if you use the formula Tesla wrote (which I might add he did not come up with, it is a common equation for finding wavelengths - it works with sound also) λ (wavelength) = c (velocity)/ f (frequency - in hertz).  If you want a quarter wavelength so that the top of your secondary is a voltage maximum and the bottom is zero, divide λ by 4.  The frequency with a 144 inch wire (at a quarter wavelength) is 20,528,640 Hz (if you assume c = 186624) OR 20,350,000 Hz (assuming c = 185000). 

I'm not sure I follow, but you want your primary to be 22.5mm because this corresponds to the first octave - the first octave of what?  Your circuit has a switch.  When the switch is open, you are charging a capacitor.  Since the battery is DC the coils are not energized.  When you close the switch, the capacitor becomes in series with the first and second primary coils, which seem to be paralleled with the secondary coils.  The secondary coils are in series with each other.  Like you said, the circuit is only on half the time.  I don't see how the primaries and secondaries interact in your schematic, but I'm assuming the capacitor and the primaries make some sort of oscillation which inductively couples to the secondaries.  I guess I'm just an idiot, but I don't get how this is suppose to be equal to unity.

Sorry for my ignorance...

[hartiberlin]

@Erfinder,

1 picture could tell more than 1000 words... !

Should I now say I hate you

Regards, Stefan.

[ResinRat2]

I think Stefan meant that in a joking way. He doesn't actually mean he HATES you. Please everyone, let's lighten up and calm down. We are all trying to help mankind in some way, let's all be civil and try to take a joke. OK

Peace everyone