Free Solid State/mechanical energy

[satyoda]

Hi


Sorry but I got carried away

now somthing that makes sense
If two sources move with equal velocities away from their common center, then their interference pattern looks like electrical and magnetic lines of force:
http://www.keelynet.com/spider/b-115e.htm
see spider

Studying different cases of motion, interesting shapes of interference patterns were found. As, for example, if two coherent sources fly nearby to each other, then interference whirls arise:
see spider 1

the Rhythmodynamics

regards,

[Charlie_V]

satyoda,

I've noticed these things from the electric fan in my bed room, very cool.

Now about Tesla, this is how the damn thing works.  The primary circuit is operated at some frequency.  The secondary resonates at that same frequency but is 90 degrees out of phase with the primary.  The secondary produces a HUGE magnetic field, the primary is mostly voltage.  When the magnetic field of the secondary changes polarity, it produces a very large voltage across the capacitor.  The capacitor in the secondary is used for nothing more than canceling the inductance so that the secondary oscillates in resonance.  The huge magnetic field of the secondary drives the rotor.  This is a completely different technique of driving a motor than in standard engineering.

OH I'm sorry, were these terms too mainstream?  Ok, lets just rename everything to something not mainstream.  Then it will be all better.  Lets call the magnetic field of the secondary "negative discharge" and call the primary "positive charge".  While we're at it, lets call the magnetic linkage between the two circuits "radiant energy".  Lets go even further by calling the negative discharge a double vortex. 

Yes thats it. 

Now we can call the circulating motion of the positive charge centripetal.  So naturally the negative discharge will yield a centrifugal motion.  Wow, how un-mainstream this is sounding now - its so great, I feel I'm really getting somewhere.  I don't like the term "resonance" so lets just call that oscillation.  Throw in a little water hammer, douse that down with elf urine, add a little dragon shit

And there we go!

we have a completely new way of describing how this motor works that is totally un-mainstream, yet is saying the exact damn thing that I said earlier.  Only in the first case everyone understood what I said, and in the second no one did. 

I know how this motor works.  I want to see how the resistance in the wires is overcome.  I want to see how the equal mass ratios add to the output, I want to see how an operating frequency of sqrt(c) effects the performance.  I don't need fancy new names for things, I need answers!

ADDING - is there a frustration face?... Darn, there isn't... I'll have to go with angry face   

[midnight_blue]

I know how this motor works.  I want to see how the resistance in the wires is overcome.  I want to see how the equal mass ratios add to the output, I want to see how an operating frequency of sqrt(c) effects the performance.  I don't need fancy new names for things, I need answers!

ADDING - is there a frustration face?... Darn, there isn't... I'll have to go with angry face  

Charlie,

The resistance is the whole key, the impulsed high voltage dc does not conduct through the wire,
but rather over the conductor, until it discharges at the end point, where greatly magnified voltages are obtained.


Regards,
Mark

[Charlie_V]

the impulsed high voltage dc does not conduct through the wire,
but rather over the conductor, until it discharges at the end point, where greatly magnified voltages are obtained.

The only time electricity is not fully conducted through the wire is when it is extremely high frequency.  In this case the resistance actually increases since the current moves along the outside surface, where the cross sectional area of the wire is very small.  Electricity flowing through a small area means high resistance.

This motor does not use that high a frequency so this would not be a problem.  Magnified voltages are the product of the resonance itself - this is not a classic transformer (V1/V2 does not equal N1/N2).  If there is some form of resistance negating being achieved from the impulse I have never heard/seen it and would like how this happens.  With all the research that was/is done with impulse circuits, I would think someone would of taken note of an effect like this.  Hehe, there would be no need for super conductors if this was the case. 

What impulses can do is produce magnetic fields of unearthly proportions.  I read an experiment some time back where they were creating magnetic fields of over 13 Teslas from impulses.  In Erfinder's terms, this would be a negative discharge of huge proportions.  I have suspected for some time that unity might be reached if the magnetic field of the secondary was large enough.  I mentioned this but Erfinder said I was wrong.  So putting it in his terms, the negative discharge of the secondary can be made larger than the positive charge of the primary, through the impulse, such that there is a greater suction, over coming the loss due to resistance.  Tesla referred to this "negative discharge" or secondary magnetic field as having great momentum.  The key to all this being that the two circuits are 90 degrees apart so the energy placed in the system is returned. 

Although I have been saying this pretty much from the beginning, and told I was wrong every time.  In each one of Erfinder's posts it seems to me he is explaining what I am talking about but using different words.....  Oh the frustration.  I don't mind being wrong, but when I am told I'm wrong and then watch someone say exactly what I just said but in a different way, just drives me nuts.  Tell me where I'm wrong (and it is not the mainstream terminology, because Tesla used these terms - he didn't invent his own).  This goes for everyone on this forum, Erfinder.  Just don't say "oh your wrong, I am so unimpressed" explain where we are wrong - stop beating around the bush!  Your the one who claims to have figured this out....

Good night for now,
Charlie

[midnight_blue]

Charlie,

I do not have all the answers and like allcanadian I'm not the sharpest crayon in the box. The reason I believe erfinder has us taking this path is to fully understand first. In my humble opinion this is probably the greatest discovery of all time. We must not let history repeat itself. By this I mean, Tesla had given the information to the greatest engineers of his time however they were unable to duplicate the effects and thus criticized him and that was the end of this phenomena.
If they had understood it, then it would be mainstream today.
You are a very intelligent person, and I in no intentions mean this in a bad way, but I wonder if you have the desire, the motivation to dig deep and find the true answers. I have learned much in the last few weeks and the 2 links I had posted to Trump were the best I have read to date. I have not found all the answers but I am still searching.
If you read those sites I think perhaps many questions will be answered.
I have also found that erfinder gives us subtle hints, just follow those to get your answers.

Here they are again if you missed them

http://www.hbci.com/~wenonah/new/tesla.htm

http://www.rialian.com/rnboyd/tesla.htm

Regards,
Mark