Free Solid State/mechanical energy

[chrisC]

@charlie_V

But then, maybe Erfinder did teach something conventional teachers failed to grasp? Maybe he'll teach them to others who really want to learn....At least, I want to learn if he is willing to teach!

Regards

Chris

[louis]

do you know what happened ?
i thought from erfinders post where he coloured in the ozone pataent that
it was going on to the next stage. and then everything was gone.

[satyoda]

@ Chris c
Yes you are right  Erfinder tried to tell us but we didn?t see it as we are blinded by main stream  but what he started will not pass away because I have been triggered and I just can not give it a rest  I will continue reading the books he recommended and some day we will meet again.

@ Charlie v
I am sorry to see you react this way I thought we were here to learn  and not to reject anybody?s quotes  If you start to tell somebody about this phenomena they will say its not possible than what do you do? 
arguing is a waste of energy their for you walk off  and just let it be
Erfinder has left us much to think about as did Tesla and all the others

Regards,
satyoda

[Charlie_V]

I'm not rejecting anyone's quotes.  I'm not sure Erfinder wants to teach anything.  As a matter of fact, I think I remember him saying something about how he couldn't teach it, only Tesla could through his writings.  Unfortunately for me, I think I will need Erfinder's teaching to understand where he is coming from. 

My second pass time is researching Tesla's works.  However, I haven't done a full patent search yet.  I need to get more books but money is tight right now.  I only read what was published from Tesla himself, not the information given from websites.  From what I've read, it all can be explained with terminology that science has given us, but Tesla does not use it in the conventional sense.  It has taken me almost two years to finally figure out how his magnifying transformer works.  I'm still a little unsure about the details, but for the most part it makes perfect sense.  It is the exact opposite of a radio antenna haha.

Right away when I saw patent 464,666 and read the line about placing the two circuits 90 degrees out of phase, I knew exactly what he was trying to do.  I had a similar idea but was ridiculed when I proposed my thoughts to my boss.  I still think this is a very interesting notion.  Modern science/engineering focuses on keeping everything "equal" so that energy is transmitted with a specific ratio - I feel the 90 degrees out of phase is a much better method.  I feel that Erfinder has taken this to a much higher level, and possibly added some to it (referring to the octave harmonics and mass equivalents).  I hope one day Erfinder will explain these things, until then I'm going to sit back and listen intently. 

[otto]

Hello all,

maybe you know, Im from the TPU topic.
Some of you could say what Im doing here. Once I sayd that your motor is almost the same as my TPU is.

Here some facts:

1. you have primary and secondary windings - TPU has the same
2. you have a Aluminum core - TPU has it but the people dont know it
3. you have a rotating field - TPU too
4. Erfinder said 144" for the  secondary winding - I tried it
5. Im using almost the same connections as the motor - or the same??? must see
6. we have 4 coils in the TPU
.
.
.

I think thats enough for the moment. With 144" secondary windings I connected 2 60W bulbs in paralel. When I disconnect 1 bulb my analog instruments shows me that my TPU does NOT react. The current from my power supply is the same. Again, connecting my 2nd bulb, the instruments doesnt react.
Of course, this afternoon I tried with only 1 such a coil and tomorrow I will built another 3 coils and then work with 4 coils. Im really curious what will happen.

Otto