Free Solid State/mechanical energy

[orosado]

Unrelated to the question: Tao, Omar, this (http://leedskalnin.com) is a clasic case of frustration. "We did it, we found the secret, look at the pictures, look at the clips". Bottom line there are no plans to replicate, no valuable explanations, however, if you feel you are impressed and you feel you're going closer to the Truth, you may consider to donate 30$, or buy a T-shirt. I think TV producers have a bigger potential for ratings in this rather than reality shows. Hope ---> Buy

Hello Barbosi,

They have a missing piece of the puzzle, that is for sure. Focusing on money will not help on development of this technology. One must do as Erfinder has, and understand what has been said, draw correlations between past genious authors, and formulate your own conclusion.

Regards,
Omar

[nat1971a]

I agree. Couldnt have said it any better.

The evidence is mounting that is for sure.

[tao]

Just wanted to bring this up.

Erfinder's original image that he posted AND that Tesla patent 464,666 reminds me of k_pullo's NOWARM Motor at http://www.geocities.com/k_pullo/nowarm.htm

Have a read, interesting to say the least...............

[nat1971a]

Hi All,

Please find below a summary of some references and observations to date for, what appears to be a key missing piece of the puzzle, namely ? neutral points or neutral polarity.



Written References

1.   ?comments in The Secret Doctrine concerning the ?Keely Motor?, a free energy device constructed by John Worrel Keely, which operated through the creation of a neutral centre, or in Viktor Schaubergers terms, a biological vacuum?.
Reference p74 Living Energies ? Schauberger

2.   "Mr. Keely, in explanation of the working of his engine, says: 'In the conception of any machine heretofore constructed, the medium for inducing a neutral centre has never been found. If it had, the difficulties of perpetual-motion seekers would have ended, and this problem would have become an established and operating fact. It would only require an introductory impulse of a few pounds, on such a device, to cause it to run for centuries. Reference http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/sd/sd1-3-10.htm

3.   Reference "The physics of the primary state of matter" Schappeller

p146 " The essential condition is that every magnet must consist of 3 parts: two poles and a neutral."

p147 "the magnets are set in opposing pairs N + S (plus and a minus) and the neutral is the central core of air space or neutralised interpolar energy. And this neutrality or impolarity is the real source of the electric current".

4.   EDWARD LEEDSKALNIN
http://www.keelynet.com/unclass/magcur3.txt

To the electrical engineers the positive electricity is everything, the negative electricity is nothing, but to the physicists the negative electricity is everything, and the positive electricity is nothing. Looking from a neutral standpoint they cancel each other, so we have no electricity, but we have something. If we do not know how to handle the thing that comes through a wire from a generator or a battery, we will get badly shocked.  Read the booklet "Magnetic Current" (MAGCURNT.ASC) then you will know what the thing is, and the way it runs through a wire.



In a permanent magnet bar between the poles there is a semi-neutral part where there is not much going in or out, but on the earth there is no place where the magnets are not going in or out, but the magnets are running in and out at pole ends more than at the Equator. Now you get the equipment and I will tell you so you can see for yourself?..
http://www.keelynet.com/unclass/magcurnt.txt



Observations of Neutral Points in the Tesla Patents

Reference: Tesla patent 568,176 Apparatus for producing electric currents of high frequency

1.   We have Tesla constructing rotors using a NSNSNSNS configuration with magnets in the basic shape of a ring. But the magnets do not appear to be touching but are very close to each other. So the question is can the polarity of the magnets cancel given that they aren?t touching and give a neutral magnetic ring). I have performed some very basic tests with some magnets separated with some small pieces of wood approximately the width of the magnet. Then moved a compass over the neutral area and it does appear to be still neutral as the compass needle doesn?t move.


2.   The position of the brushes in figure 2 also line up with the neutral point (VOID) of the magnets




Reference Tesla Patent 464,666 Electro Magnetic Motor

1.   In this patent we have what appears to be 6 coils, each in the shape of a horseshoe magnet. The horseshoe shaped coils in Tesla patent 464,666 puzzles me. I am starting to think that Tesla has created a ring shaped induction coils of some sort. It is very hard to tell.

He describes the rotor as "a rotating armature of independent field magnets or coils exerted successively and not simultaniously"

He says in the text "wound with coils D, closed upon themselves, as is now the general practice in motors of this kind"

If we think of these coils as being magnets, as he has indicated that they could be magnets, then they probably wouldnt have any polarity and become neutral. So it appears that coils closed upon ?themselves? must become neutral too.

2.   Also interesting is where Tesla had placed some of his coils namely N1 and S1. They are placed at the neutral points. Actually it appears that the all the coils are placed in all the neutral points as there are neutral points in the middle of the magnets (coils) as well.

Regards,

N.

[tao]

One of the slices in FEMM...