Exploring the Inductive Resistor Heater

[lanenal]

Well, read my two questions carefully; you didn't actually answer the two questions that I asked.

The first question I answered indirectly, but you don't seem to understand. The second question can be answered the same way -- just try to understand my very post from which you raised your question, because it can be inferred from it. If you can't, I am sorry I can not help you either.


I have to say that we should focus on the validity of Greg's conclusion, not about nitpicking all those small things. That only distracts and disinforms.

[TinselKoala]

The first question I answered indirectly, but you don't seem to understand. The second question can be answered the same way -- just try to understand my very post from which you raised your question, because it can be inferred from it. If you can't, I am sorry I can not help you either.

That's just the kind of non-answer we have come to expect from people who don't know what they are talking about, but attempt to "explain" things to people who DO.

I have to say that we should focus on the validity of Greg's conclusion, not about nitpicking all those small things. That only distracts and disinforms.

In other words.... stop picking on the ignorance of lanenal, and get back to discussing the bogus claims of someone else who is so ignorant that he uses a big resistor in line with a gate driver chip.



Meanwhile.... here's something that is in Gmeast's "direct lineage" of descent. This is the "work" that caused Gmeast to undertake his project, and this is the "work" that is at the basis of all his and Ainslie's claims.

Take a look at what Rosemary Ainslie thinks her circuit does.

Note carefully how she misrepresents the explanations that she has been given, while at the same time failing to understand HOW MOSFETS WORK and how the capacitances come into play. She still maintains, in spite of literature from Agilent, Tektronix, and others, and in spite of several very clear demonstrations to the contrary, that a Function Generator cannot pass current from an external source "from its signal terminal and probe"..... Further, she clearly STILL doesn't understand the linear operation regime of mosfets, something that plays a critical role in her circuit's behaviour.

It's easy to make fun of this ignorant and arrogant woman, because her own words, captured exactly in images like this, amply illustrate her paranoia, willful ignorance, arrogance, and insulting manner.

She libels anyone who disagrees with her, she lies about the events that happened concerning FuzzyTomCat and Harvey, and I am looking forward to seeing what she comes up with on June 1. Or is it July 1? Her original demo video, posted on one of her FOUR DIFFERENT YouTube accounts, contained so many lies and "smoking gun" reveals that she finally tried to remove it... but it is still available in spite of her coverups.

[TinselKoala]

TK, what a great find -- I wonder what tool you have used, looks like you've got CIA team behind you .

Do you think so? Or is it more likely that I simply used the forum's "search" function?

In that post, I was talking about the time average current (cause that's what matters in that case) while ignoring the leakage current, in that case, it is obvious that the time averaged gate current is zero.


lanenal

Is it really?

Well, then..... you are in the position of having to explain my results, then.... Your flailing about is becoming amusing.

My light bulb attached to the FG output lead LIGHTS UP when the circuit is made through the mosfet's capacitances .... even though the "time averaged current" is zero, it being an AC signal that is applied by the FG. Yet, in spite of "time averaged current" being ZERO..... power is dissipated in the light bulb.

Why does my light bulb light up, if the "time averaged current" is zero and the mosfet cannot pass anything except the leakage current?


Why do we focus on these small things? Because they are at the root of the larger things, like claims of free energy/overunity performance, when there is actually none there.

Come on, lanenal, explain to me why my light bulb lights up. Time averaged current = zero, signal applied to a mosfet that is functioning in a circuit, and  to one that is isolated, with the same results: signals that are oscillating at or around the frequencies used in the circuits we are discussing here, pass through the gate-drain and gate-source capacitances with hardly any attenuation, and are fully capable of dissipating power in a load, even though the "Time averaged current" may be zero.

[TinselKoala]

Here's a video that presents a demonstration that Ainslie denies is even possible. She has claimed many times, even as recently as this morning, that a Function Generator cannot do this: Pass current from an external battery source to power a load, or act as a power supply itself.  You wonder why we continue to examine and stress the basics? It is because of things like Ainslie's ridiculous and ignorant-- willfully ignorant--- claims about circuits and test equipment behaviour. And Gmeast is her protégé!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuBWVmRmUtc

And here's another video illustrating some more things that Ainslie thinks are impossible. MOSFETs switch by gate CHARGE, and they can in many applications be used NOT as a switch but as an amplifier, with an output resistance that depends on the magnitude of the gate CHARGE, not some poorly defined and even less well understood (by lanenal and gmeast) "gate current". The "linear" mode of operation is very important in the behaviour of Ainslie's circuit.... yet she refuses even to acknowledge that it is even possible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKstLQYayNA

And while I'm on the subject..... note Ainslie's claim in the post image above about running without a separate supply for the signal generator (which supplies the negative bias necessary to produce her magic oscillations) in her circuit. Guess who was the first to show how to do this, well before Ainslie's claim (never demonstrated) to have managed it. And also note her lie about what it is that I "claim". All of us have shown that a negative bias current is producing the oscillations in her circuit; we have shown how to make the oscillations without any FG at all, in a steady state, by supplying the required bias current from an external power supply, an external battery, and finally-- MY WORK-- from the circuit's run batteries themselves by using a charge pump inverter. And I have shown, by reproducing her measurements, that her measurements do not mean what she thinks they mean at all and that there is no battery recharging, or lack of discharging, or any other anomalous effect happening in her circuit.  Now, Gmeast's circuit either IS, or IS NOT, a replication of Ainslie's work, depending on the day of the week or the phase of the moon.... but everything we have learned from dealing with Ainslie and her circuit(s) over the past three or four years applies directly to his circuit work as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHxstOJkFtM


A demonstration of the necessary bias current to obtain oscillations in the Ainslie "Q-array" circuit, no signal generator needed:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbHo3CCJtaw

[lanenal]

Do you think so? Or is it more likely that I simply used the forum's "search" function?Is it really?

Well, then..... you are in the position of having to explain my results, then.... Your flailing about is becoming amusing.

My light bulb attached to the FG output lead LIGHTS UP when the circuit is made through the mosfet's capacitances .... even though the "time averaged current" is zero, it being an AC signal that is applied by the FG. Yet, in spite of "time averaged current" being ZERO..... power is dissipated in the light bulb.

Why does my light bulb light up, if the "time averaged current" is zero and the mosfet cannot pass anything except the leakage current?


Why do we focus on these small things? Because they are at the root of the larger things, like claims of free energy/overunity performance, when there is actually none there.

Come on, lanenal, explain to me why my light bulb lights up. Time averaged current = zero, signal applied to a mosfet that is functioning in a circuit, and  to one that is isolated, with the same results: signals that are oscillating at or around the frequencies used in the circuits we are discussing here, pass through the gate-drain and gate-source capacitances with hardly any attenuation, and are fully capable of dissipating power in a load, even though the "Time averaged current" may be zero.

Why are you keep repeating some trivial common sense which you pretend that I don't understand? And as I have already pointed out, it is not pertinent here because that energy has already been accounted for by Greg in his first post.