Big try at gravity wheel

[Grimer]

It's an offset gyro situation.


In effect you have two angular conservations of momentum going on. One in the vertical plane and one in the horizontal plane. Gravity is acting on the one in the vertical plane just as it does with the offset gyro.


This means that the energy being generated is one derivative higher than Jerk, i.e. Snap. No wonder nobody's found it till now.


To get a feeling of what's going on imagine an offset gyro which is happily precessing around its tower. Now stop its precession. What happens? The gyro whips up doesn't it. Now supposing that whip up is prevented by a crank on a shaft. then the gyro will apply a force to that crank which will turn that crank-shaft an increment. That's RAR.

[Low-Q]

It's an offset gyro situation.


In effect you have two angular conservations of momentum going on. One in the vertical plane and one in the horizontal plane. Gravity is acting on the one in the vertical plane just as it does with the offset gyro.


This means that the energy being generated is one derivative higher than Jerk, i.e. Snap. No wonder nobody's found it till now.


To get a feeling of what's going on imagine an offset gyro which is happily precessing around its tower. Now stop its precession. What happens? The gyro whips up doesn't it. Now supposing that whip up is prevented by a crank on a shaft. then the gyro will apply a force to that crank which will turn that crank-shaft an increment. That's RAR.

What you are describing reminds me of a power ball. I have one. Funny to play with. Ofcourse (At least I assume) that a very big power ball can be powered by the earth rotation. However, it takes 24 hours on one revolution...that might cause some practical challenges.


Vidar

[Grimer]

The following four post are from another forum. Since the subject of the offset gyro has come up I thought I would reposte them here.

[cite]Posted By: Grimer[/cite]

[cite]Posted By: Grimer[/cite]The Eric GraviMobil can be simulated with a VentoMobil moving vertically.


A vertical alpha-atmosphere wind blows down the face of a sheer cliff.


Vertical rack rails are attached to the cliff and the VentoMobil is provided with pinion wheels running on the rack rails.


When pointed into the wind the Ventomobil will climb steadily up the cliff.

Suppose now that the pinion wheels of the Ventomobile come to breaks in the rack.


The Ventomobil will no longer be able to climb and will reach an equilibrium with the vertical wind. It will hang, apparently weightless, just as the GraviMobil on a tower hangs. We know of course that the Ventomobil equilibrium is a dynamic equilibrium, the wind driving the sails which in turn are providing torque to the pinions. The full weight of the Ventomobil is taken by the racks in the same way that the full weight of the offset gyro is taken by the tower.


Now it will be helpful to go further and have the GraviMobil actually driving up into the wind (and I will explain how to do this later) but that is not necessary for the recognition that GraviMobil is driving against the gravity wind and suspended against gravity by this drive just as the Ventomobil is with the atmospheric wind.


So Laithwaite is vindicated.


How on earth has such an important insight been missed?


The same way that the 6th power equation of state for water was missed.


By an inadequately complex model of behaviour. Galbraith's pin joints instead of moment distribution.


In the case of water no-one saw it in terms of two phase behaviour with one phase in tension, the other in compression. I saw it because I came from a background of research into the properties of clays where that mechanism is obvious.

Because people find it difficult to appreciate the dynamic equilibrium of a offset gyro or a magnet sticking to a fridge it is best to move on to an example where the harnessing of the gravitational wind is more obvious.


Somewhere, there is a video which shows a toy railway truck being driven by the reaction of an offset gyro hanging off the side.


I think Eric missed a trick there. He should have shown the gyro driving the truck up an incline, albeit a curved incline. By continuing the incline to form an ascending spiral and carefully accounting for frictional losses he could have shown that the system was gaining potential gravitational energy.


In the truck case Eric's muscles are not involved. It seems to me that Al's appeals to Eric's muscles was merely a device to balance the books since he didn't have strain gauges on Eric's muscles and can have had no idea what the muscular contribution was to the Eric demonstration.


I'll have to see if I can find a link to the truck demonstration.

[Groundloop]

So, what happened to http://www.rarenergia.com.br/
?

Last website update was on (dd / mm / yyyy) 14 / 06 /2013.
Is there any member on this forum living near Gilman - Illinois USA?
If so, is it possible for you to take a look at the construction site of
the second gravity motor build, to see if there is any construction activity?

GL.

[Low-Q]

Are you still discussing this corn machine? It isn't a gravity wheel. It is a tool. More than one picture is faked, etc. to make you believe this is a gravity machine project. Well, it's not. Move forward ;-)


Vida