Big try at gravity wheel

[nfeijo]

They say it is working beautifully !

[Low-Q]

They say it is working beautifully ! (http://www.rarenergia.com.br/imagem44a.JPG)

Maybe we should wait to see the machine actually running. I'm "surprised" that no one yet has posted a video of this machine in action.


Vidar

[Pirate88179]

Maybe we should wait to see the machine actually running. I'm "surprised" that no one yet has posted a video of this machine in action.


Vidar

Vidar:

They have to wait until the corn harvest.  Then we will see it in action processing the corn as it was designed to do.  (Smile)

Do we have an address for this location?  Possibly, Google Earth street view might show something interesting?  They are really going wild updating those views.  We have like 5 camera vehicles running all around my small town over here in Kentucky.

Bill

[Low-Q]

It must be an over unity machine, because a corn processing machines looks like this: (I cannot see similarities between those.. :-))

http://images.travelpod.com/tw_slides/ta00/a7e/40c/self-made-machine-for-corn-processing-nisporeni.jpg

[Grimer]

I thought the properties of water must be "one of the most thoroughly understood areas in science" until I discovered the 4th, 8th and 12th power laws governing the vapour pressure of water; also the 6th power law governing the absolute pressure vs volume relation for water.


http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/strange.html


It would be difficult to think of a more important liquid to mankind than water. After all, our bodies are mainly water.


There's a very apposite quote on people's failure to revise ideas in science by a lady philosopher. I'll have to see if I can find it.

I've found the quote in a BesslerWheel.com post of 2009




Simone Weil, had the situation bang to rights when in her essay, "La Science et nous" she wrote,


========================================
What is disastrous is not the rejection of classical science but the way it has been rejected. It is wrongly believed it could progress indefinitely and it ran into a dead end about the year 1900; but scientists failed to stop at the same time in order to contemplate and reflect upon the barrier, they did not try to describe it and define it and, having taken it into account, to draw some general conclusion from it; instead they rushed violently past it, leaving classical science behind them.


And why should we be surprised at this? For are they not paid to forge continually ahead? Nobody advances in his career, or reputation, or gets a Nobel prize, by standing still. To cease voluntarily from forging ahead, any brilliantly gifted scientist would need to be a saint or a hero, and why should he be a saint or a hero? With rare exceptions there are none to be found among the members of other professions.


So the scientists forged ahead without revising anything, because any revision would have seemed a retrogression; they merely made an addition.
========================================