Big try at gravity wheel

[minnie]

Say we need 40 hp.
Say we have 15 weights.
Say they are 5000 lbs.
Say they drop 4 ft.
Say we can do 25 rpm.
Say by magic we get 5 percent  extra from gravity.
40 x 550 x 60 x 20 =26,400,000 ft/min required.
Take one weight 1,760,000 ft/min.
5000 x 4  x 25 divide by 20 because we get 5% = 25,000
Someone who does math needs to work this out
for me because I'm not too hot at it!
                John

[Poit]

Say we need 40 hp.
Say we have 15 weights.
Say they are 5000 lbs.
Say they drop 4 ft.
Say we can do 25 rpm.
Say by magic we get 5 percent  extra from gravity.
40 x 550 x 60 x 20 =26,400,000 ft/min required.
Take one weight 1,760,000 ft/min.
5000 x 4  x 25 divide by 20 because we get 5% = 25,000
Someone who does math needs to work this out
for me because I'm not too hot at it!
                John

Thats a lot of 'says'... just out of curiosity, how is any one suppose to work this out if "magic" is involved?

[Red_Sunset]

An opinion is worthless... pointing out a fact is priceless..
and the FACT is no one has proven over unity!
Want to argue with that? then you are really stupid! the ONLY counter to that argument is provide actual proof of over unity!
Write your reply, I don't care... you can write and write and write.. doesn't change the fact that YOU HAVE NOTHING!!! NO PROOF!! NOTHING!! so go ahead and try and write and write until your hearts content, its all meangingless drivel!

I thought that the first line in my previous posting was descriptive enough. I am not here to prove anything neither to make anybody believe anything.  Although I do like a good structured argument/discussion that can take our knowledge to the next level.

Minnie,
It all hinges on a principle.  A small "one watt" energy gain cycled and multiplied one million times per second is not to be ignored.
Sure it wouldn't look like the RAR or the ZED, but it could utilize the same principle.

Red_Sunset

[powercat]

I have proof, the same kind of proof Euclid had - but someone who can't instantly see the answer to the water and wine problem will be incapable of appreciating it.
I can spell, too.

talk the talk but you can't walk the walk,
how many years have we seen people like you on this forum talking in riddles and promising solutions, and yet nothing real is delivered,  good to talk but you shouldn't promise things you can't deliver.

[Red_Sunset]

talk the talk but you can't walk the walk,
how many years have we seen people like you on this forum talking in riddles and promising solutions, and yet nothing real is delivered,  good to talk but you shouldn't promise things you can't deliver.

Hi Cat, I can not figure out to what text you are referring to, can you clarify,
1.. The riddle ?
2.. The promise of a solution or delivery?

It appears to me that people are waiting out there with hands open, for handouts.  Maybe I am mistaken, but you give me also the impression that a delivery is required/mandatory for top notch OU blueprints, triple proofed and guaranteed in perpetuity. 
I thought this was a incubator forum to share and discuss technical idea's with possible excess energy relevance.

Enlighten me pls,  Red_Sunset