Big try at gravity wheel

[Red_Sunset]

The Hammerheads are here, circling !!
BEST APPROACH TO THIS FORUM, treat it like a flee market.
If you like something, check it out good and make your own assessment.
Do not rely on any by-passer to tell you what is the right McCoy!
There are some great treasure buys here, but use your head and do not loose it.
Stay cool !

Red_Sunset

PS: Conrad, they are not the same, but since you can not validate it, you can not believe it.
We are dealing with a virtual truth !

[powercat]

Warning in all markets they are conman trying to convince you they have great products and that they know what they're talking about, but don't worry they never stay too long,  people in time can see through there broken words and inability to deliver what they preach .

[Grimer]

Hi Grimer,
    conditions are awful for the poor sheep. I've been working on this land for 55 years and this is the
wettest I have ever seen it.
  I like you Grimer, you've got a sense of humour, a thing a lot of contributors don't seem to have.
I have been on  a similar journey with Fletcher-we never got anywhere, but I enjoyed the ride.
Glad to hear you've got grandchildren, we've got a baby in the house at the moment and I just
can't imagine how my wife and me managed when we had four in under five years.
                                                      John.

Yep, I've got grandsheep in spades - and hearts - and diamonds - and clubs.


Here's the three St Albans families in June 2000.

[MarkE]

HER were supposed to have a system set-up for Mark Dansie to observe operating for 48 hours as an initial test over two years ago.  That never happened.  The "instrumented" machine was built and supposedly run two years ago this spring.  Again, nothing came of it.

HER is about five years in.  The lawsuit suggests that the early investors are getting restless.

[fletcher]

MarkE .. IIRC, HER is claiming to have found 'efficiency differences' between the upstroke & downstroke cycles, leading to a COP > 1, IINM.

This descriptive is interesting in itself, as they acknowledge that there is no OU, but that the ordinary system energy losses can be mitigated by different technology use at certain stages - and the combined result is excess useable mechanical output energy greater than the input energy.

How this is not COP > 1 I am not sure.

They were also adamant IIRC that environmental heat energy [or air pressure, for example] did not enter or leave the closed system as part of the Carnot Cycle re: adiabatic warming & isothermal cooling legs, etc.

FWIW my impression at the time was that the technology wasn't claimed to be OU or PM or contravene the known Laws of Physics - yet could somehow output more energy than input energy required, but didn't use any environmental energy input to supplement conservative gravity - perhaps my recollection has faded over the lapsed time period [I know my interest has] so don't take it as gospel.